): 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' does not contain a definition for 'FontIndex' and no extension method 'FontIndex' accepting a first argument of type 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (line 92) 2. Error (CS1061): 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' does not contain a definition for 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' and no extension method 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' accepting a first argument of type 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (line 94)…
0.533000void brightfunc skyfunc2 skybright perezlum.cal010 1.382e+00 3.201e-01 1.066879 -0.754821 0.015485 -0.048998 -0.089403 0.066341 -0.860010 0.505947
The values in bold are then evaluated using the equations in the file perezlum.cal inside the RAYPATH directory in Radiance..
{ All-weather Angular Sky Luminance Distribution . Additional arguments required for calculation of skybright: A1 - diffus normalization A2 - ground brightness A3,A4,A5,A6,A7 - coefficients for the Perez model A8,A9,A10 - sun direction}skybright = wmean((Dz+1.01)^10, intersky, (Dz+1.01)^-10, A2 );wmean(a, x, b, y) = (a*x+b*y)/(a+b);intersky = if( (Dz-0.01), A1 * (1 + A3*Exp(A4/Dz) ) * ( 1 + A5*Exp(A6*gamma) + A7*cos(gamma)*cos(gamma) ), A1 * (1 + A3*Exp(A4/0.01) ) * ( 1 + A5*Exp(A6*gamma) + A7*cos(gamma)*cos(gamma) ) );
This data is then mapped to the "glow" material that represents the celestial hemisphere...You can edit the climate based sky produced by Honeybee and enter your own values. The other option would be to just use gendaylit from DOS Prompt.…
nt to multiply the number of items in the list A, so at the end I will end up with the same number of elements in each lists.
e.g. (for branch 1 in list A I want to have two times the same curve, and the same for the branch 2 and so on )
List A (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=1
{2} N=1
{3} N=1...
List B (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=2
{2} N=2
{3} N=1...
NEW List A (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=2
{2} N=2
{3} N=1...
Any suggestions about how to do this?
Thank you,
Martha
…
GH) > then define (still in GH) some instance definition (or many: case variants) > then place it according some "policy" (3d point grid and the likes). Note: Only doable with code, mind (C# in my case).
Obviously you can skip the creation part and instruct GH to deal with instance definitions already listed in the Block Manager (say: find the block named "cell666_B3" blah, blah) ... but that means that you can only use them (meaning a rather "limited" parametric approach) and not make them from scratch (meaning a true parametric approach).
But I guess that you've tried the block way in the Rhino environment already. That said I use rather solely this approach in GH and yields quite manageable object collections - I would say "real-time" response (up to 20K instances) but I use dedicated Xeon E5 1630 V3 workstations (with NVida Quadros K4200 and up for the graphic response part of the equation) so the "performance" is rather a subjective thing.
Modifications:
easily doable with GH (on instance definitions at placing time: since you need only to scale them and not vary their topology).
Anyway post a portion of the R file.…
FORE MeshMachine (rather better) or after
BTW: For a mesh with 7M points ... well... you'll need some proper CPU to deal in a reasonable amount of time (what about a Xeon E5 1630 V3?).
Alternatively find a friend who knows very well Modo ... and see first hand what the US Movie Industry is all about.…
rees west to 1 degree west). Changing the latitudinal domain from, say, 0:1 (the equator to 1 degree north) to 88:89 (88 degrees north to 89 degrees north), has zero effect on the x,y shape of the topography map generated. However, in reality, the map should be far, far thinner in the latter case, because longitudinal lines get closer together toward the north and south poles. In actuality, the shape should be close to a trapezoid in both cases, but this is probably not a necessary detail for most people producing maps, since, at an urban or smaller scale, the latitudinal lines bounding the north and south of the map will probably not be that significantly different in length. But the maps should at least stretch from close-to-square for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the equator to an extremely thin rectangle for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the north pole.
As an example, I'm looking at a location in Sheffield, UK. The relevant SRTM HGT file spans from 53 N to 54 N, and 2 W to 1 W. The length of the map in the north-south direction should be approximately 111 km, as is the case with the topo map generated by Elk (and a near-standard for 1 degree latitude anywhere in the world). The length of the map in the east-west direction, however, should be somewhere in the range of 67 km, since the 2 W and 1 W longitudinal lines are much closer together at this latitude than they are at the equator. Thus the map should be nearly twice as long in the North-South direction as it is wide in the East-West direction.
If this were to be sorted out, I think it would be really nice to then have the SRTM topo map be positioned automatically in relation to the OSM map being brought in. I think it's good that the OSM map is positioned at 0,0, rather than it's world coordinates, but maybe the SRTM topo map could be aligned with it based on the latitude and longitude domains we input to the SRTM grasshopper module.…
the map? For example in one list I want curves 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 60. In another I want curves 1, 37, 40. In another maybe 70-80. And in the last, all curves that aren't specified in those three lists. Is there a way to partition the lists as such?…
18): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.Text' is obsolete: 'Use RichText or PlainText' (line 88)
2. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.FontIndex' is obsolete: 'Use Font property instead' (line 92)
3. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.RhinoDoc.Fonts' is obsolete: 'Use DimStyles table instead' (line 92)
1. Error (CS1061): 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' does not contain a definition for 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' and no extension method 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' accepting a first argument of type 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (line 94)
Wondering, if perhaps, you will be updating for Rhino 6 compatibility?
Cheers
Lyndon
…