some i7 if ECC memory sounds an oddity to you). If the model is big you'll need a decent Kepler Quadro as well ... say a K4200 (I hate game cards including Titan).
http://www.tsplines.com/
Alternatively use a top dog subdivision app (Modo eats them all for breakfast) but that works with DX and that brings us back to game cards.…
this target list:
(a1, b1, c1, d1)
(a2, b2, c2, d2)
(a3, b3, c3, d3)
....
What I want to do is injecting one more value (arbitrary angle in my case) to each point before I cull many of them - so that each point brings its angle data along.
Any hep would be greatly appreciated. TIA
…
omponent that increases in the x-axis (example below).
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 etc...B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 etc...C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 etc...D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 etc...
This is as far as I've gotten:
I have collected my points on the grid into a "List Length" component and input that into a "Series" which input into a "Function" with the expression Format("A{0}",x). The result labeling resembles the example below.
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 etc...
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.…
. The rules to dispatch the lines are the next:
I start with a list that alternate true/false; like that: true, false, true, false.
If the angles between those lines are greater than 89° I want to inverse the next part of the list:
True, False, True, False, True, False,...
become
True, False, [>89°] False, True, False, True, [>89°] True, False,...
I managed to create a true false list, to check for the greater than 89° angle, to separate the lines relatively to the angles, but I don't know how to inverse part of the list at certain index.
(In the picture, I have written 90° but it should be 89°, I check for greater than 89° and not equal to 90° because in the real rhino model, the lines won't be exactly orthogonal)
If you have another idea to to reach the same result, it's also okay, I tried to find rules to solve the problems, but I may have overlooked other solutions !
And if there is some part of the patch that are correct but there is easier solution, I would love to learn as I am still new to grasshopper.
Thanks for taking the time to read. :)
…
on for curves, if you make an algorithm that dynamically defines the possition of the controlpoints for NURBS curves as a function of the parameteres in F(t, a1,...,b1,...,c1,...)= x(t, a1, a2...)+y(t, b1, b2...)+ z(t, c1, c2...) or F(x, a, b ,c...)?
…