,with OpenfoamV1612+ in Windows 10 64bit.The blockmesh worked good.And the snappyhexmesh crashed in the process.My computer memory is not enough? Or some settings wrong?Could you help me solve this question?/---------------------------------------------------------------------------| ========= | || \ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox || \ / O peration | Version: v1612+ || \ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com || \/ M anipulation | |*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/Build : v1612+Exec : snappyHexMeshDate : Aug 27 2017Time : 09:39:54Host : "default"PID : 13443Case : /home/ofuser/workingDir/butterfly/outdoor_airflownProcs : 1sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10)allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //Create time
Create mesh for time = 0
Read mesh in = 2.14 s
Overall mesh bounding box : (-241.5472 -241.4418 0) (496.4376 536.2438 144.8633)Relative tolerance : 1e-06Absolute matching distance : 0.001081851
Reading refinement surfaces.Read refinement surfaces in = 0.01 s
Reading refinement shells.Refinement level 3 for all cells inside around_buildings_area.stlRead refinement shells in = 0 s
Setting refinement level of surface to be consistent with shells.For geometry outdoor_airflow.stl detected 0 uncached triangles out of 120Checked shell refinement in = 0 s
Reading features.Read features in = 0 s
Determining initial surface intersections
Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1684728Number of edges to retest : 1684728Number of intersected edges : 5583Calculated surface intersections in = 1.68 s
Initial mesh : cells:554112 faces:1684728 points:576779Cells per refinement level:0 554112
Adding patches for surface regions
Patch Type Region
outdoor_airflow:
6 wall buildings
Added patches in = 0.03 s
Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1684728Number of edges to retest : 0Number of intersected edges : 5583Selecting decompositionMethod none
Refinement phase
Found point (127.4452 147.401 72.43167) in cell 402042 on processor 0
Surface refinement iteration 0
Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 8820 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 3.87 sSelected for refinement : 8820 cells (out of 554112)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 1883850Number of edges to retest : 250376Number of intersected edges : 21198Refined mesh in = 1.77 sAfter refinement surface refinement iteration 0 : cells:615852 faces:1883850 points:652499Cells per refinement level:0 5452921 70560
Surface refinement iteration 1
Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 38502 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 0.04 sSelected for refinement : 40392 cells (out of 615852)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 2787132Number of edges to retest : 1118049Number of intersected edges : 85655Refined mesh in = 3.17 sAfter refinement surface refinement iteration 1 : cells:898596 faces:2787132 points:990317Cells per refinement level:0 5432351 486812 306680
Surface refinement iteration 2
Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 159213 cells.Determined cells to refine in = 0.1 sSelected for refinement : 168471 cells (out of 898596)Edge intersection testing:Number of edges : 6576117Number of edges to retest : 4737635Rhino Model and GH files is in t'he zip file.Please help me solve this question!~~…
are Grasshopper, plug-in per la modellazione parametrica in Rhino. I partecipanti saranno guidati attraverso gli aspetti più importanti del programma e le principali tecniche per la programmazione visuale all’interno di Rhinoceros.
ROMA 22>25 NOVEMBREinfo: http://artc.it/corso-grasshopper-con-arturo-tedeschi/…
divided into two stages: the first one focused on design strategies in Cairo and the second one about prototyping and realization of a 1:1 model in Barcelona atIaaC<Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia
NOUMENA & ALGORITM organize an international competitive workshop that will take place in both Cairo- Egypt and Barcelona – Spain where you’ll explore innovative design and fabrication strategies (Advanced Architecture, Parametric Design, NURBS Modeling , Optimization, and Fabrication).
THE COMPETITION will run between the workshop participants. it is divided into 2 main phases.
Travelling to Cairo
Phase 1: starts the 1st of September in Cairo (think, design, compete, and prototype)
- participants will get lectures and tutorial on parametric design, modeling
- participants will be divided into groups and start an internal competition.
- each group will propose their optimized parametric pavilions fabricated in small scale
- a selected jury will choose the best two pavilions as primary winners
Travelling to Barcelona
Phase 2: starts the 14th of September in Barcelona (Adv. optimize, finalize, fabricate, and win)
- all participants will get advanced lectures and tutorial on algorithms and optimizations
- participants will get experiences on big scale fabrication
- the 2 pavilions will be fabricated in big scale by all participants
- final Jury will choose only one pavilion to win the competition.
LIMITED SEATS (only 25 SEAT). every participant must submit his CV, portfolio, and statement of interest to the organizers by email: register@ealgoritm.com and info@noumenaarch.com. In case of acceptance we will contact the participant to continue registration.
Submission deadline is 15/8/2014. Participants’ selections : 18/8/2014
Workshop and competition fees : 600 Euro…
.0004. [1 of 7] Writing simulation parameters...5. [2 of 6] No context surfaces...6. [3 of 6] Writing geometry...7. [4 of 6] Writing materials and constructions...8. [5 of 7] Writing schedules...9. [6 of 7] Writing loads and ideal air system...10. [7 of 7] Writing outputs...11. ...... idf file is successfully written to : c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\unnamed.idf12. 13. Analysis is running!...14. c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\eplusout.csv15. ......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
16. 17. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.2.7-777c1f8d79, YMD=2015.02.28 16:09,IDD_Version 8.2.718. 19. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.20. 21. ** Warning ** Version: in IDF="'8.2.7'" not the same as expected="8.2"22. 23. ** Warning ** ManageSizing: For a zone sizing run, there must be at least 1 Sizing:Zone input object. SimulationControl Zone Sizing option ignored.24. 25. ** Warning ** ManageSizing: For a plant sizing run, there must be at least 1 Sizing:Plant object input. SimulationControl Plant Sizing option ignored.26. 27. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1228. 29. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_12_GLZ_1230. 31. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_2532. 33. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_25_GLZ_2534. 35. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_2836. 37. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_28_GLZ_2838. 39. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_940. 41. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_9_GLZ_942. 43. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1044. 45. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_10_GLZ_1046. 47. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1148. 49. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_11_GLZ_1150. 51. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1552. 53. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_15_GLZ_1554. 55. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_2456. 57. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_24_GLZ_2458. 59. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_2560. 61. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_25_GLZ_2562. 63. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3064. 65. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_30_GLZ_3066. 67. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3268. 69. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_32_GLZ_3270. 71. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3472. 73. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34_GLZ_3474. 75. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.94495E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_076. 77. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.84753E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_178. 79. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.16905E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_380. 81. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.96186E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_482. 83. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.37373E-005], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_684. 85. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.35824E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_786. 87. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[5.86549E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_888. 89. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.63765E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1090. 91. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-8.09566E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1292. 93. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.51701E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1394. 95. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.29917E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1596. 97. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.94451E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1698. 99. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.03294E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_17100. 101. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.83026E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_18102. 103. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.29917E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_20104. 105. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.19851E-005], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_21106. 107. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.63765E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_23108. 109. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-4.05899E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_25110. 111. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.35824E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_27112. 113. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-9.91146E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_28114. 115. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.70158E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_29116. 117. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.22781E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_30118. 119. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.67821E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_33120. 121. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.22737E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_34122. 123. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.65634E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_0124. 125. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.70736E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1126. 127. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.42507E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3128. 129. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[5.89276E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_4130. 131. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.91146E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_6132. 133. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.71205E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_7134. 135. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.34494E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_8136. 137. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.60159E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_9138. 139. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-1.11946E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_10140. 141. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.41257E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_11142. 143. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-8.21483E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_15144. 145. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.65716E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_16146. 147. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.84044E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_17148. 149. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.12297E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_19150. 151. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.14324E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_22152. 153. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.88887E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_23154. 155. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-9.89060E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_24156. 157. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-1.14849E-003], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_25158. 159. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.00479E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_27160. 161. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.63061E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_28162. 163. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.09018E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_29164. 165. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.49326E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_30166. 167. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.17446E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_32168. 169. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.60686E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_33170. 171. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.48515E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34172. 173. ** Fatal ** GetSurfaceData: Errors discovered, program terminates.174. 175. ...Summary of Errors that led to program termination:176. 177. ..... Reference severe error count=24178. 179. ..... Last severe error=GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.48515E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34180. 181. ************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).182. 183. ************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.184. 185. ************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.186. 187. ************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 2 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.188. 189. ************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 41 Warning; 24 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 1.51sec190.…
Loop'. The fun part of the slower version is that you can see what it's doing while it's running. 'Fast Loop' gives no indication that it's working, so you want to test it with small numbers and be sure it's coded properly before bumping the iteration count up.
The GH profiler running the slow version showed between 1 and 1.5 seconds per loop, but the reality was more like ~10 seconds per loop toward the end of an 11 X 11 grid, or ~20 minutes total. It's easier to be patient because you know it's working.
The 'Fast Loop' finished the same grid in 1.6 minutes! An impressive improvement. I've been running it on a 30 X 30 grid (900 points) for ~23 minutes so far and see nothing yet. Not the ~12 minutes I had hoped for... Now 36 minutes on this loop for 900 points... hope it's not stuck. Not fast! Later - DONE!! Profiler says 59 minutes for 900 points but it was more like an hour and twenty minutes total. It succeeded, I have a single 'Closed Brep' from 900 extruded rings, baked to Rhino.
Another strategy to explore would be doing 'SUnion' on a smaller grid using the Anemone loop, then replicate it by moving it as needed to form a larger grid; then run the copies through another 'SUnion' loop. I went ahead and implemented that while waiting. It works and is fast! Started with 3 X 3 and ran the result again as 5 X 5 (9 X 25 = 225 total) in barely ~70 seconds!? Trying 36 X 36 now... 1,296 points appears to have succeeded in less than ten minutes! Though it seems to take quite awhile after the loop ends before control is restored to GH/Rhino. I'll let you do your own experiments and benchmarks.
I encapsulated the loop in a cluster called 'suLoop' (blue groups).
Internal of 'suLoop' cluster:
…
Added by Joseph Oster at 11:14pm on March 22, 2017
oducts/207700-profile-connectors/25/1 ). Find one that can being fixed.
3. Design a custom aluminum beam (or contact Fipa) - BTW. Chinese do custom stuff for peanuts money.
4. Create the vault LBS first using the beams (the "skeleton").
5. Study Migua elastic inserts (critical) and Ceresit PE/S sealants. Get the gist of bridging gaps as a pro.
6. Use marine grade plywood only as a facet top cover (and some proper false ceiling). Plywood dimensions are usually 1.20 * 2.20 m. A 25 mm sheet could be OK for a small vault. DO NOT varnish the plywood. Epoxy glue linear aluminum L (10/10 mm) along the upper lips (in order to allow silicone to adhere properly (not shown in the image below) : failing to do that ... buy an umbrella).
7. Use trigonometry to calculate the variable beam placement per module.
Do this:
…
ingle surface. But as seen on left surfaces in attached zip screenshot "A" and proj. "6b-RnGH_Simpdatainter-TTTWriteXL_J gh.3dm", i spent more time attempting correction of the patched polysurf many errors, artifacts and lack of original surface topology, all regardless of uv count or "flexibility". Fortunately, as seen on upper right surf of screenshot A & proj., a Quad polygon Mesh patches to an accurate surface and texture (even with backside "spike" artifacts) so long as patch Spans and Flexibility are sufficient. Also, Grasshoppers patch reproduces surf's far more accurate than Rhinos (possibly due to Rhinos patch, 100 unit uv count limitation? or my ill use).Would like to send the polysurface for you as well Dave(Hello &feel free to chime in), but even zipped the .3dm is 25 mb over GH3D site 5mg limit, so i had to remove it.- is there another way, perhaps Pm, email etc. i could send this to you both?,A)WRITEXL:As seen in screenshot "2.jpg", my WriteXL output is not in the same "Set1-5" format as yours, so perhaps won't be read properly by your Simpledatainterpolation def.1) how to fill each XL cell with single x,y,z coordinate or corresponding row name and column group numbers?, ..same as your XL format. Once answered i can finally blend my surfaces in your Awesome! def.,....i've used: Right-click panel > Stream Contents to.txt format, then on Excel sheet, click empty cell Data tab > Get External Data > From Text. This imports x coordinates into a column, then y and z coord's one at a time. But please show any method to import all coord's simultaneously if possible?, and possibly how to use .xyz export format?,2) how to trim off excess Patch surface?, ..Patch > Trim is set to True but surface remains untrimmed,.B)INTERPOLATION:Screenshot 1 previews baked, Mesh deconstructed points,screenshot 3&4 shows results of Interpolation when mesh points are Set in Point component AND Set as one file path in ReadXL using "6b-RnGH_Simpdatainter-TTTWriteXL_J gh.xlsx", which contains the same "Streamed" X,Y,Z mesh points.It interpolates INcorrectly: moving vertically with the top left corner as high point, and does not change shape as your interpolated points\surface does.3) how to correct my mesh points interpolation to same as yours?,.4) how to alter your def. so it interpolates between 2 excel .xlsx containing surface xyz points?,Really impressed and appreciate your example instruction and powerful def's,hope to talk soon and learn more.Big fan, Jeff…
ra Designer Pro 6, but Xara is pretty good at file compatibility so you can probably open them on many versions.
You are free to use and modify these vector graphics for any project, document or webpage that is associated with Grasshopper. You do not need to credit me, though it is not allowed to pass the work off as your own without modifications.
There are no fast and hard rules when it comes to the graphics style of Grasshopper icons, but I suggest you try and mimic line-weights, contrast, saturation and arrow and point symbols when designing your own icons.
Note that all icons must be 24x24 pixels and most icons in the original set leave a 2-pixel empty border around all edges. All icons with such an empty border have a drop-shadow with the following properties:
Blur = 2 pixels
Colour = black
Transparency = 65 out of 255 (roughly 25%)
Horizontal offset = 1 pixel to the right
Vertical offset = 1 pixel downwards
I apply drop-shadows as a post-process effect in a pixel-editor, as Xara is not good at pixel effects on very small images.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
a given with the third set of information (at the 6th minute). From that, it will then match - for the same exact boats - the speed data given at the 4th minute. Finally it will do a matched subtraction of V(4th) from V(6th) for each boat. Those numbers - whether then scaled up / down or somehow manipulated - will act as the Z dimension which will create the topology. Since V2 - V1 can have a minus value, the overall topology will be a mix of mountains and icebergs this time.
Perhaps to be more accurate, we could divide V2-V1 by 120 and let the topology show the change in speed in a second within that two minutes; the XY coordinates belonging to the latter position of the ships, not the first.
Your definition as you say helps for the linear drawing as it continues from it's stopped. I used that in the current sketch as well for again doing the same thing.However when, I tried to use it for what I am trying to do with the acceleration thing, the result was different. I will try to explain this again;
Let's say that until this point 6 sets of data has arrived - so 12 minutes has passed -. Within that 6 sets, the number of of boats for each one differ as not all of them are able to send data every time. Let's assume in total there are 25 boats and 18 of them have always managed to send data in those 12 minutes. So 18 from the beginning until the end, and finally let's say the remaining 7 of them only could manage to come into the picture at the 4th set of data (so 4,5 and 6).
Now, if I were to build a topology of acceleration for the 6th minute which would mean that I would have to subtract V(4th minute) from V(6th minute) of all 18 vessels, I would need index 2 and 1 from all the branches. If I do this only after 6 minutes has passed from the beginning it would probably work, however if I do it later like at the 12th minute, it does not.
And the very reason for that is when the remaining 7 join the crowd at the 8th minute they obtain an index number of 0, and then 1, and then 2 - at the 12th minute. Because of that when I try to match the V2-V1s with Coordinates on the Unary Force component, while there are 18 sets of coordinates, there are 25 different speed values.
Of course this is quite a simplified scenario and perhaps your vessel matching could solve this specific one but there are cases where its more complicated and random.
I do still want to show vessels' position in a specific time with such pipes you have suggested, but I am trying to construct a collective model, in its simplest form being equal to pipes + topology
For the time thing, what I meant was in this version when you click play the mountains just keep on rising and the topology is constantly deformed. I was wondering if we can set up a timer so that it runs the physics engine for couple of seconds and then freezes the topology as it is. Otherwise I would have to press pause manually everytime, which is not that big of a deal tbh, just for the accuracy sake it would be good to run the engine for the same interval for each model.
All the best,
Levent…
ysim.ning.com/
When you run the simualtion you will notice on the batch terminal that Daysim is also being called, so you may want to consider how Daysim uses Radiance files & data.
Regarding your current problem, I think you stumbled onto something weird and interesting.
Interior and exterior readings appear to differ by 40 in the best case scenarios. Even setting the transmittance to 1 yields similar results. I tried changing from cummulative sky to climate sky and got similar values. Changing the test points did nothing either.
I think, (yet I'm too lazy to prove this) that the difference in values stems from diffuse radiation over the sky dome.
If you delete everything except the glass you'll notice that interior values are like 80-90% of the exterior values (this seems like the expected behaviour with a transmittance of 1). So, if we consider that a vertical window, part of an opaque box, is receiving radiation from 25% of a sphere, as you start to inset the interior test points the radiation they receive will be a fraction of the 25%.
Let me try to explain this better...The exterior surface receives radiation from a section of a sphere calculated by 180degrees on the xy plane (let’s call this angle theta) and by 90degrees (let’s call this angle phi) in azimuthal elevation. If you integrate this over spherical coordinates (theta from 0 to pi; phi from 0 to pi/2) you will find that it comes to a quarter of a sphere. By comparison, the interior surface will not integrate theta from 0 to 180degrees,nor phi from 0 to 90degrees, instead it will be the subtended angle from the exterior surface as a function of their separation; the farther in you go the smaller the view of the outside.
If my hypothesis is correct there shouldn't be that much difference since the separation is only 10cms...the subtended angle would be like 170 instead of 180 for theta and 85 instead of 90 for phi...overall if you integrate both spherical areas there should only by a difference of 10%.
In conclusion, I believe the unexpected behaviour stems from the previous subtended angle thing. If direct radiation was the only factor the difference would be the aforementioned 10%, which suggests that an additional source of energy is also affected by this. Perhaps indirect and diffuse radiation from other areas of the sky dome.
I’m definitely intrigued on why this is happening. Please post if you figure it out.
Regards,
Mauricio
…