error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)). I'm not familiar with a lot of the magic and programming languages behind how this plugin works between Rhino and Illustrator, but I did a bunch of prodding trying to find a way to use Illustrator CC 2017 with it.
In the end I couldn't. But I installed CC 2015 (19.0.0) and it worked perfectly. This is on my personal laptop running Windows 10, with Illustrator installed at its default position on the C drive. No other more recent version worked for me, but I think that's more of a problem with my own dying laptop.…
"INTERFACES: ARCHITECTURE . ENGINEERING . SCIENCE".
Applications are still open for the Karamba workshop (between September 20 - 24) lead by Clemens Preisinger and Moritz Heimrath - "Optimization of Statically Informed Grid-Shell Patterns".…
le or assembly 'IllustratorInterop, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I'm wondering if this is related to the COM library issue that many others have been experiencing? I'm running the latest version of CC (2017) and the latest version of Rhino, but not WIP. Will this plugin essentially have to be rewritten every-time illustrator is updated? I look forward to using it. Thanks for you help!…
思った感じになりません。
balls の代わりにplanarカーブを直接入れてみましたがエラーが出ます。
ファンクションにしてみたところ、forループので作った数値が反映されていません。
ファンクションのインスタンス?を出力していないと思い上記のようにしましたがエラーが出てしまいます。
以上の事から自分の認識が正しいのかよくわからなくなりました・・・
python自体の深いところをわかっているわけではないので余計こんがらがりました。
そこで、for b in ballsはどのような条件または使い方であれば使えるのでしょうか?
そして、上記のように別のオブジェクトに対しての使い方はどのようにすればできるのでしょうか?
2:同じファンクション内のdist = rs.Distance(self.pos,b.pos)についてですが
この文章も for b in balls によってbはBallのインスタンスであると定義?されたためb.posがbの位置であると分かるのでしょうか?
pythonは定義しなくても動いてしまうのでどのような時に使えるのか文章見ただけではよくわかりません・・・
大変細かいことかもしれませんが、よりpythonをしっかりと理解するためにも、どなたかわかる方ご教授いただけると幸いです。…
、、、不同角度的理解、诠释、运用和发掘规律、、、
新闻或者幻觉:马王堆墓穴中发掘出了丝绸做的鞋,不算是现代意义上真正的鞋,但是完成了一个完整的公式。
有一部分需要是共同的,在离开了沙滩和草地的时候。
找一个成熟的不一样的数学思维合作者,(可以一起申请参加sg2014活动,也可以不)
我想听到人们写给自己的语言,我不害怕听不懂;
也不在意你能看到我的美丽的脚和我们美丽的城市。
你存在?存在0.1%?如果≥1/4
With the two version of the PDF in the file upload, doubt, 10th should be able to see the many PDF.
There are some scruples, confusion ——"The additional property of professional activities",——Subject classification, commercial, regional、、、
There is a place Africa, people don't wear shoes, A few people with grass or leather on the foot (and buildings——In order to spatial density) winding,
the manufacture of shoes, two sales do two judgment:
A There is no life belongs to shoes
B this is the market.
I spent a lot of energy explained to students, which is not to do programming people do、、、 the different angle understanding, interpretation, application and explore the law、、、
The news or illusion:Mawangdui tomb unearthed silk shoes , is not the modern sense of true shoes, but the completion of a complete formula.
There is a need is common, when they leave the beach and grass.
Find a mathematically mature different thinking partners,(Can apply to participate in the activities of the sg2014, also can not)
I want to hear people wrote their own language, I am not afraid of don't understand;
Don't care what you can see my beautiful feet and our beautiful city.
Do you have? There are 0.1%? If ≥1 / 4 You know what I did wheni found out about you?
msxf6688@163.com
…
and fine-grained control over the Excel 2017 COM objects, to be used with Bumblebee. :) I was unable to get Bumblebee working with the latest Excel, and I wanted to add more fine-grained control over file creation, application processes (killing background processes primarily), etc. Now that it's mostly working, I'm really enjoying all of the flexibility you've built in to Bumblebee. It's working great.
Anyway, I'll share that when it's ready, still more testing to do...
Cheers,
Marc
…
Added by Marc Syp to Aviary at 12:15pm on December 4, 2017
pen Brep"; I didn't know it worked on flat surfaces. And I think it's only fair to include in your benchmark the considerable time 'SUnion' takes in this example: 21.9 seconds for 121 rings and likely much more with 400 or 1,000+ rings.
Then I noticed the pattern doesn't match. Checked the circles and they are the same. The distance between them, however, is different: 7 instead of 6. When I change that value to 6, the Python fails badly. All the holes and gaps are gone, which destroys the pattern:
I can't do the "two phase" approach on an 11 X 11 grid, but I can do 6 X 6 and 2 X 2 to get a 12 X 12 grid (40 'SUnion' operations) in 28 seconds total. That beats your benchmark of ~37 seconds for an 11 X 11 grid, if you include the 'SUnion' in your code.
…