hat offer an even spacing of 11 gems from 0.0 to 1.0, and though the Anenome script works it is not as robust to various shapes and sometimes just stops at some point even on mellow curves:
The Hoopsnake script in the other thread: Hoopsnake doesn't want to appear multiple times in a document since resetting one resets them all and it only runs the first instance when I pasted two more copies of the whole script in, so I'll do them separately, and instead of an input reset wire, there is a right click Reset All item in the pop-up menu.
I understand now how the two looping components work, in having a geometry input for the first item, then they accept a second item input as new geometry that then gets looped as the new geometry replaces the original. What a great hack, so I was wrong above about only being able to loop numerical values.
Since I really like Anenome better due to its nice interface, I've converted the old thread Hoopsnake program to Anenome. It still won't handle multiple curve pairs, so I made copies of the whole script.
I learned a lot today. Thanks guys. Given how well these straightforward scripts can work, I'll bet there's a much shorter Python version possible, one that most anybody could understand and thus adapt. If I have time I can start again this time from scratch. Converting the long one taught me about the problem though. Grasshopper makes it easier though, since Circle TTT only needs one center point hint whereas Rhinocommon TryFitCircleTTT needs three.…
nally used on the pre-intersected multizone file, which also needed the full exterior distribution only.
Running your revised version now on these machines here, the result is identical to the one you posted above (below screenshot from run on my machine; and yes, the last GH file I sent is the one from which the previous screenshots originated)
(CMap result from your attached script ComfMap_CWM, ran on MD machine)
That is, incidentally, identical to what my script produced even before your changes!
In an earlier post, you showed a result image that comes much closer to what I would expect the output to be (so, in fact, you have already produced two different results):
(screenshot from your earlier post on July 11, 2016 at 10:05pm)
The "error" I was/am hence chasing is in the difference between these two results. The last screenshot from your earlier results shows a radiant temperature dropoff that is much more in line with the contribution of the cold glazing temperatures as evident in the E+ results. What do you think?
Apart from that, I am glad that now, at last, our outputs from the same script are identical on both machines. The usercustomLibrary has not changed, I have however attached it again. Other GH files are usually not open, no; the last results all came from single open file GH instances.
Thank you for your help again Chris- it's an interesting issue. I owe you a beer (or a few) should you stop by in Berlin one day!
Best,
Max
…
len , I lost all of my work (at least the 3d modeling)
And I frankly if I want to participate I´ll need to finnish up the board and i cant do the renders on my own I need more time , but I only have until 11:59 pm of July 6 to finnish up one render, if you feel up to the challenge, whoever completes it will receive 290 dollars (its all I can give) to any account you want. I basically need one single image.
It consists on 3 towers, with an organic facade, I'm including the competition board I had saved on in my dropbox, I want more or less the same perspective shown on the left of the board.
Sorry, but i'm desperate, I had it all done but well cant control everything in life i guess, only do it if you feel you can pull off a professional render.
Thanks. (contact me and I´ll give you more info on the towers, I was able to save some limited sections and floor plans .... but yeah.. limited, so you´ll have to base your work on the images I provide here.
I can give some files now, including images of the physical model.
Board: http://i.minus.com/idYpFK844DWns.jpg
Physical model: http://imgur.com/a/PywJa
Hope its enough, I'm also including one image i had where I explored the footprints of all the buildings, but its just for reference.
I know theres barely enough time to finnish it... but I dont know what else to do, do you guys think i should probably just take a good photograph of the model and run with that? I feel that would probably look very unprofessional :l but I really dont have a choice here
…
ells new products like the Firefly Interactive Prototyping Shield which mounts on top of your Arduino Uno and provides access to a number of useful input (ie. sensors) and output (ie. motors) devices. It includes features like:
Three linear slide potentiometers connected to analog pins 0, 1, and 2
Two-axis joystick connected to analog pins 3 and 4
Light sensor (photocell) connected to analog pin 5
Three push buttons connected to digital pins 2, 4, and 7
Red LED connected to digital pin 13
RGB LED connected to digital pins 3, 5, and 6
Two servo connections on digital pins 8 and 9
A connection to the Easy Stepper Driver (co-designed by Sparkfun Electronics and Brian Schmalz) to control stepper motors. The direction of the motor is controlled through digital pin 10 and the number of steps through digital pin 12
High-voltage MOSFET circuit capable of driving lights, valves, DC motors, solenoids, or anything else requiring higher voltage or current. The gate of the MOSFET is connected to digital pin 11 (PWM).
Some come take a look and let us know what you think!
…
analysis with Honeybee. Here is the tentative outline:
09:00 - 09:30
What is Honeybee, Introduction to daylighting simulation
09:30 - 11:00
Geometry preparation workflows, Radiance materials
11:00 - 11:10
Break
11:10 - 12:30
Sky types, Run your first simulation
12:30 - 13:30
Lunch
13:30 - 15:00
Daylighting analysis types, Result visualization, Getting started with annual daylight
15:00 - 15:15
Break
15:15 - 16:00
Annual daylight analysis and Results interpretation
Check MEBD page for more information including the registration link: http://www.mebd-penndesign.info/Honeybee-MEBD-Workshop-PennDesign
Please feel free to forward this to anyone of interest.
Cheers,
Mostapha
PS: Thank you all for the kind comments and emails for the Ladybug workshop. We recorded the workshop and are in the process of figuring out how to share it with the public. I will send an update once it is uploaded.
…
o Common - just like C#. But Rhino Python has a "Scripting Language Wrapper" which breaks commonly used taks down to simpler functions.
Here's a general Example:
Take a look at the code on this website http://wiki.mcneel.com/developer/rhinocommonsamples/addline). Generally it's Rhino Common code in three language to create a line. They look equally difficult.
But if you use Rhino Python Scripting you can use an simplified syntax to get the same result. It's very similar to Rhino Script.
The code would be:
import rhinoscriptsyntax as rsstart_point = rs.GetPoint("Get start point")end_point = rs.GetPoint("Get end point")line_id = rs.AddLine(start_point, end_point)
OK - No Error Tracking here, but still you can see that the syntax is much simpler. (And in the end you just have less lines of code you have to debug.
And the good thing about Rhino Python is, that you can mix these approaches. Once you reach a level where Rhino Python Script doesn't get you there, which by the way happens very rarely, you can still use the Rhino Common methods.
Also, in Python Sycripting 99% of what you probably would like to do is available as a "wrapped" script function.
Rhino Python Script is currently also better documented than Rhino Common for C# and VB.Net. If you have used Rhino VB Script before, these functions will be very familar to you.
I'm not sure, why it's currently a separate plug-in. I belive the reason is that Rhino 4 (which is supported by GH) doesn't support Rhino Python. Also it's currently WIP, so it needed to be updated more frequently than GH itself. In the long run (I believe) it might be integrated into GH as a general component
- Martin
P.S.: To use Rhino Python within GH is a little more tricky than my example - but nothing compared to developing C#
P.S.2 Here's the code with Error Tracking:
import rhinoscriptsyntax as rsdef AddLine(): start_point = rs.GetPoint("Get start point") if start_point is None: print "No start point was selected" return end_point = rs.GetPoint("Get end point") if end_point is None: print "No end point was selected" return line_id = rs.AddLine(start_point, end_point) return line_idAddLine()
…
ARRAY with certain spatial order or mechanism under consideration of ecological design. The evaluation and definition of “ARRAY” are open to applicants’ imaginations. While the term “ecological” is subjected to many definitions: social, ecological, sustainable, its re-evaluations are open to students’ interpretations. Entrants are free to choose or make site, real or virtual.
ELIGIBILITY
Open to international students in the fields of architecture and design related disciplines from an accredited four-year or five-year architecture program. Graduates with certificate in 2011 are accepted. Teamed collaboration consisting of no more than 3 students in the above mentioned fields is permitted. Works submitted must be of applicants’ original works. Works done through school studios are accepted, but limited to 2011 term.
ENTRY FEE
Free
DEADLINES
Online Registration deadline: Oct 30th, 2011, 17:00 Taipei Time
(Upon completing registration, applicant will receive a registration number via email.)
Submission deadline: email sent by Nov 3rd, 2011, 17:00 Taipei Time
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
This is a digital competition and no hardcopies are necessary. Entrants must submit their proposal via email no later than Nov 3rd, 2011 17:00 (Taipei Time) to the following email address:
hojenhwang@mail.ntut.edu.tw
The project submission must contain the following files:
1. Two A1 boards in portrait format (594mm x 841mm), with identification number at the upper right corner. Names and other identifying information are not allowed on front side of the boards. The resolution of the boards must be 300dpi, RGB mode and saved as JPG files.. The files must be named after the registration number followed by the board number. For example: 03956-board1.jpg and 03956-board2.jpg.
2. A DOC file containing the project discription (600 words max). This file must be named after the registration number followed by the word "discription". For example: 03956-discription.doc.
3. A scan of statement form. This file must be named after the registration number followed by the word "statement_scan". For example: 03956-statement_scan.jpg.
4. All the files must be placed in a ZIP folder named after your registration number. For example: 03956.zip. Size of the ZIP folder is suggested to be less than 15mb, while size more than 25mb will not be accepted
AWARDS
(1) Gold Prize winner will be awarded TWD 60,000 and a trophy.
(2) Silver Prize winner will be awarded TWD 30,000 and a trophy
(3) Bronze Prize winner will be awarded TWD 15,000 and a trophy
(4) Honorable Mention winners will be awarded TWD 5,000 and a merit certificate
Winners will be announced and notified by mid of Nov, 2011.
JURY
Two stages of open jury. Details to be announced
PUBLIC EXHIBITION
Nov 13, 2011~ Nov 18, 2011 at NTUT, Taipei
…
Added by Yu-Min Su at 2:03am on September 23, 2011