o retrieve the first one: (0;0), (0;1) ... (0;4), I put 0 in Path and the TreeBranch turns red. What am I doing wrong?
I would really appreciate some help!
Thankyou!…
Added by Tina Jerrera at 8:09am on November 25, 2016
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, etc
In addition to the components in the attached file, I have also tried using Cull Index but that did not do much. I tried using a number slider set to whole numbers with the range equal to the values I have set up in the integer, but it just increases the size by 1 every time. Any help on steps in the right direction would be great thanks.…
1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21
1+2+3+4+5+6+7 = 28
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 45
Is there a tool, that can do me that job?
How do I get this List {1,3,6,10,15,21,28,36,45}?…
Added by Ahmed Hossam at 2:19pm on September 22, 2013
vas
Closing and creating a new file (memory resets when this is done) @4:00, 5:57, 6:53
System slow down and crashes @ 8:16 (takes 5 minutes to end the process - perhaps not the most entertaining movie to watch until the end - a good point to turn the kettle on)…
which doesn't exist in the actual problem spec. If galapagos is allowed to change the column position in all possible directions, it is less likely to get stuck in some local optimum.
Let's assume that (all other things being equal) column 20 would yield the best possible answer. The current state of the system though is at column 26, which is pretty good too, just not as good. Galapagos is more likely to 'mutate' the state a little bit instead of a lot, so it'll explore the columns near 26. However 20 isn't near 26 at all, only 25 and 27 are nearby, and maybe 24 and 28. But they'll all worse answers, so after sampling in those directions GP will abandon that as fruitless.
If however you specify the columns using two variables, then the columns near 26 are 20, 25, 27 and 32. That's a far richer space to explore which much better approximates the real problem.…