(1000000). When I select "link" instead of tie (inside GSA) and select only tension in the link properties (see image 1), the calculations are done in 30 seconds.
Is there a way to define the "link properties" (as shown on the image) in GH?…
it,
[3] the upper limit, [4] the slider position.
What do you think?
Matt
Radlab, Incorporated
25 Drydock Ave, Floor 6
Boston, MA 02210
W| radlabinc dot com
E| matt@radlabinc
P| 617.440.3588…
Added by Matt Trimble at 7:54pm on November 17, 2009
Loop'. The fun part of the slower version is that you can see what it's doing while it's running. 'Fast Loop' gives no indication that it's working, so you want to test it with small numbers and be sure it's coded properly before bumping the iteration count up.
The GH profiler running the slow version showed between 1 and 1.5 seconds per loop, but the reality was more like ~10 seconds per loop toward the end of an 11 X 11 grid, or ~20 minutes total. It's easier to be patient because you know it's working.
The 'Fast Loop' finished the same grid in 1.6 minutes! An impressive improvement. I've been running it on a 30 X 30 grid (900 points) for ~23 minutes so far and see nothing yet. Not the ~12 minutes I had hoped for... Now 36 minutes on this loop for 900 points... hope it's not stuck. Not fast! Later - DONE!! Profiler says 59 minutes for 900 points but it was more like an hour and twenty minutes total. It succeeded, I have a single 'Closed Brep' from 900 extruded rings, baked to Rhino.
Another strategy to explore would be doing 'SUnion' on a smaller grid using the Anemone loop, then replicate it by moving it as needed to form a larger grid; then run the copies through another 'SUnion' loop. I went ahead and implemented that while waiting. It works and is fast! Started with 3 X 3 and ran the result again as 5 X 5 (9 X 25 = 225 total) in barely ~70 seconds!? Trying 36 X 36 now... 1,296 points appears to have succeeded in less than ten minutes! Though it seems to take quite awhile after the loop ends before control is restored to GH/Rhino. I'll let you do your own experiments and benchmarks.
I encapsulated the loop in a cluster called 'suLoop' (blue groups).
Internal of 'suLoop' cluster:
…
Added by Joseph Oster at 11:14pm on March 22, 2017
0;3} (N = 2)
{0;0;0;4} (N = 2)
{0;0;1;0} (N = 2)
{0;0;1;1} (N = 2)
{0;0;1;2} (N = 2)
{0;0;1;3} (N = 2)
{0;0;1;4} (N = 2)
Flattening this structure using the Flatten component would result in:
{0} (N = 20)
However, using a Path Mapper with the following masks will flatten is somewhat more intelligently:
{A;B;C;D} -> {A;B;C}
Now, you get:
{0;0;0} (N = 10)
{0;0;1} (N = 10)
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 3:19am on December 14, 2009
That is correct. In reality there are 3 major versions of .NET 1, 2, and 4 (different versions of mscorlib.dll)
Rhino 4 uses .NET 2 which includes 3 and 3.5.
Rhino 5 uses .NET 4
angle has to be between 5° to 15°
-for color 2, the angle has to be between 20° to 30°
etc..
Can I subdivided the surface by type of color (exemple: color 1 will be 2 subdivision; color 2 will be 3 subdivision, ..)
many many thx for your help guys :)
…