orkshop will give students a functional understanding of Grasshopper and Parametric design. This will allow them to build on this understanding into more advanced projects of their own including design optimization with RhinoCAM-NEST and creating their models on a laser machine. Basic knowledge of Rhino 5 is required to be able to take this training. Details...
Location: McNeel Miami 1538 NW 89th Court Miami, FL 33172 United States
More Info: e-mail: Jackie Nasser phone: 305 513 4445
Note: The course must reach a minimum of 5 enrolled students. If the course does not meet the minimum, it will be canceled.
*If you live outside the Americas and you wish to purchase this product, you should choose the United States as country of residence. The rest of the information should be correct.
*Si usted vive fuera de las Americas y desea comprar este producto, deberá escoger como país de residencia United States. El resto de la información debe ser la correcta.
McNeel Miami's RhinoFabStudio - Miami, Florida
.
…
e. We know you want to concentrate on your design, rethink the spaces, the material and more other beautiful and important topics. You will learn the power of parametric design in examples, challenges and develop your own systems to optimize your work, make changes, variations and convert your design into a full BIM model in real time : )
Who should take the course?
Everybody who is new, beginner or excited about Algorithmic design and the Rhino Inside Revit game changer development. The skill level of the workshop is BEGINNER.
The Workshop finish with a Discussion + Virtual Beers with PAZ Academy ;D !
https://pazacademy.com/workshops/rhino-inside-revit-3h-online/…
Rhino (groups of curves) and I want to distribute them with the pattern in the ABBCABC format (I want to change the pattern later so I need it in string format).
I have managed to write the code to read the string (using case command) but I dont know how to copy and move the objects. How do I reference the curves? As BRep, curves, polylines or objects? This is what I have done so far:
Dim move As New Vector3d Dim textLen As Integer Dim i As Integer Dim ch As Char
Dim proba As String
Proba = " "
move.X = 0 move.Y = 0 move.Z = 0
textLen = Len(text)
For i = 1 To textLen Dim t(i) As curve ch = Mid (text, i, 1) move.Y = i * d Select Case ch Case "A" t(i) = A.duplicate A.Transform(transform.Translation(move)) proba = proba + "*A" Case "B" proba = proba + "*B" Case "C" proba = proba + "*C" End Select
print(proba)
Next
I have to add that this function (transform.translation(move)) didn't give any results.
Thanks in advance …
h a loft operation later on.
I've read some topics in the forum regarding offsetting, but it seems that no one have had this problem (very surprisingly I'd say).
This is what I'm doing:
a) I have a non-convex, closed polyline in the XY plane (the native curve being referenced from rhino). Let's call it CURVE A
b) I rotate and move CURVE A to a different plane (obtaining CURVE B).
c) I offset CURVE B, and now it has more segments and points than CURVE A (basically, it creates the segments that would be required to close the shape if it had been offset segment by segment instead than as a whole)
d) when I loft these curves - CURVE A and CURVE B, it gets messy (since the different curves have different segment count)
I've tried a lot of workarounds:
1 - Offset CURVE A on XY a certain amount, and then offset it back, obtaining CURVE A 2.0. It doesn't work, since CURVE A and CURVE A 2.0 have the same topology, so the final loft is still messy
2 - Offset CURVE A on XY without offsetting it back: It works, but I need to maintain the original shape at the base of the resulting surface (after the loft operation described earlier). I thought that just scaling the resulting brep would do the trick, but then I realized it doesn't.
3 - Using CURVE B (the curve that later will be lofted with CURVE A) to finds its closest point on CURVE A, and then re-creating the original curve with this new points (CURVE A 3.0): Doesn't work on all cases...
So that's it I think. I'm really lost with this, so any help will be very much appreciated. …
to carry out without them. We will go through these plugins learning how they work, main features and advantages playing with practical exercises.
We will highlight key concepts in advanced design, architecture and engineering: topology, form-finding, structural optimization, fractals, loops, genetic and repetitive algorithms...
Also, we will see how to capture nice views and designs from your scripting, with a correct export option, animations...
This course is On-line live sessions (18hours), using our platform online.controlmad.com
STRUCTURE:
- Interactive flexible geometry
- Generative design
- Reaction diffusion
- Geometry from DNA parameters
- Generative path visualization
- Growth simulation by sub-D
- Generating and genetic algorithms
- Visualization techniques
Main plug-ins shown:
> Kangaroo: The most famous and downloaded app for Grasshopper (it is built in the current Grasshopper for Rhino 6). It is a live physics engine interactive simulation, optimization and form-finding directly within Grasshopper
> Galapagos: available in the current Grasshopper build, it is a platform for the application of Evolutionary Algorithms to be used on a wide variety of problems by non-programmers
> Biomorpher: Interactive Evolutionary Algorithms (IEAs) helping designers to explore the wide combinatorial space of parametric models without always knowing where you are headed.
> Anemone: works using repetitive algorithms to create loops or sequencial structures like those ones seen in fractals.
Dates: July 10,11,17 and 18 (total 4 days)
Registration deadline: Monday, July 5th
Timetable: Saturday and Sunday 9,30 - 2pm (Madrid Time Zone CEST)…
Added by Diego Cuevas at 3:40am on September 11, 2018
rea.
(GH screenshot, Excel screenshot, and various model space screenshots in jpg below)
organize%20by%20floor_v4_for_online_question.jpg
(GH definition) : organize%20by%20floor_v4.gh
The user controls the length of the floor plate with a slider while the width is taken from Excel as the largest width value among the rooms.
The rooms are prioritized sequentially. (e.g. 'A' is prioritized above 'B', 'B' is prioritized above 'C', etc.) This essentially means that is the floor plate gets to small to accommodate all room, the last room (in this case 'D') would be first to move to higher floors, then 'C', and then 'B' as necessary. 'A' would always remain on the first floor plate.
My thought process: Compare the added lengths of different room combinations that could potentially be adjacent to one another to the user determined floor plate length. Using dispatch components, create a 'flowchart' of If/Then scenarios that tests these comparisons and seek for a room configuration that minimizes room displacement. Once the definition knows what should move where, the rooms are moved using vertices that are put together from the room dimensions, as all movement is relative to the other spaces.
My problem: This definition is highly customized for the scenario of having only 4 rooms, but I would like to create a definition that performed a similar operation on any potential 'n' amount of rooms. The problem with that is that it would require the use of a varying amount of components, as increased number of rooms would need more length summations, length comparisons, and embedded dispatch paths. Is what I am trying to do possible? Can grasshopper create a varying number of components based on the list length of rooms?
Please help!! Thanks!! …
Added by Drew Brooks at 11:02am on January 22, 2014
is also takes place in own system. However, this action can be also carried out successfully by a foreign reference, if this considers the focused system as own. Hence, these two criteria are considered in my reflexions, to make your criticism handier for me.
First the question must be put up, how is it in your case? Of friendly manner you answer this question perpetually with the statement that you are not a partial of the system of the architecture.
Furthermore the question would be appropriate, whether an external reference (eg CAD) determined architecture. This can be answered with no, because determining and influencing are different things.
Because you stress now your criticism as a foreign criticism, within the architecture the assuption must be put up, that this criticism is not unusual new on the one hand (because this condition were also in other times like that, and presumably also always so remain) and further more a lack of goodwill in your criticism comes to light, which perhaps distinguishes an external reference.
Based on your critique, it would be also desirable in the system of the architecture if the academic rules become satisfyingly followed, even if this is no guarantor for good academic works. Nevertheless, there is an aspect which at least tolerates the evident lack in the Interdiziplinarität of the architecture. This is the classical and still valid determination of the architecture, presumably regulates not only the actions of the architects, but also those who want to become it.
Many who stand in your criticism (the students, as well as the teachers, ... ), live in the awareness that architecture is a profession that combines as many areas around the topic of Building, and the architect is even only one dilettante among the external specialists. In this determination dilettantism is revalued rather positively, because this state the architects enables to assess the facets of a complicated building project better and to form thereby the whole result positively. To be a good architect, you should have circumspect specialists around yourself. And exactly this knows the system of the architecture, because "THE ARCHITECT" helps himself with the logic of other systems (to repair on the one hand his own deficits), and to create an artificial complexity, which ultimately aims to be the complexity of human beeing.
Here "THE ARCHITECTS" becomes a quality-spoken, which currently seems the external reference (CAD, BIM) would like to take claim for themselves.
........
If would not thought about it, this might be helpful:http://www.amazon.com/The-Alphabet-Algorithm-Writing-Architecture/dp/0262515806/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1376920450&sr=8-1&keywords=mario+carpo"Finally, I’d like to restate my criticisms in general terms. If we are serious about moving architecture and urbanism away from purely artistic considerations and into a more rational arena, there has never been a better time than now. All of us have access to immense computational power which can be applied to problems that have been —until quite recently— intractable. But of course the garbage-in-garbage-out adage holds true; computation can be used to generate large amounts of complexity, but complexity does not equal worth. The only time when it makes sense to invoke computation in the design process is when there is some relevant data that needs to be computed" (David Rutton)I want to make it short, and just ask a few questions, and hope that the following questions are relevant also for you, and not be considered outside your system. i think that the weighting to such questions seem to be more valuable, not for the architects.1. What is wrong from a pure artistic intention?2. What is any sense in purely architectural discourse?3. strictly looked, can be determined sense generally in a purely architectural discourse?4. What is purely architectural discourse?5. What is Funktionalismus or Rationalismus without philosophical support? 6. Would not be the pure functional fulfilment empty ? 7. Would be not a critical position on the promise of purely rational algorithms applied?…
s o alguna de sus partes con la máquina de control numérico de ControlMAD. La finalidad es entrar en contacto con las herramientas disponibles ( control numérico, corte por láser, brazo robótico, scanner 3D..) para construir formas y superficies de geometría compleja a partir del 3D del ordenador.
El curso se acompaña de visitas para conocer de primera mano el trabajo con estas herramientas digitales.Duración: 48 horas:Clases de 3D: Modelado con RHINO (16 horas) + GRASSHOPPER (8 horas) + Vray (4 horas)Proyecto personal tutorado y fabricado en su totalidad o en la parte más significativa con la máquina de control numéricoVisitas programadas:Taller de maquetas. Maquetas de arquitectura para estudios como Zaha Hadid o Moneo. Trabajan con láser y control numérico.Fundición Capa: han realizado esculturas para Dalí, Oteiza o Manolo Valdés entre otros. Trabajan con scanner 3D y brazo robótico.Pasarela sobre el Manzanares, de D. Perrault.…
ilion.
Then i sketched the outline curves in rhino with a few control points. The building is symetric so i only draw one side. But i'm not sure what is better for a voroni. a sharp or a soft surface? Or dose i need points?
So i have some questions:
1. how can i loft the curves correctly? My problem is that if i divide my curves for more control points, grasshopper automatically change my curve. thats ok but than i've the problem with a short curve, which fit bevor with the large one, but after the devision it can't connect.
So i tryed to duplicate the long curve and split it but with the shatter battery it dosen't work. It always cut the curve somewhere.
2. my next problem is, the curves in rhino should be my main construction, which is always visible. so i decided to offset the curves that i got a colum. but i don't know how to orient the offset curves in the xyz axis.
3. hopefully if i have the surfaces, how can i build a voroni which is offsetet, and has maybe some different thicknesses? :D
Would be really great if s.o. can help me. I tried a lot but not every thing is simple.
Sorry for my bad english.
Thx max
Here are my files:
FCP_MAX_GH_konstruktion_1.3dm
FCP_MAX_GH_konstruktion_1.gh
…
d the workshop PDF from this link: http://goo.gl/bcvRNH Download event poster from this link: http://goo.gl/Q0KWCM Brief: Cairo is filled with barriers controlling people movements, suppressing them as well as detaining green and public spaces to the extent that most people have been taking these spaces for granted. Public spaces have been for a while the periphery of our daily life. We will explore in this workshop how we can manipulate and alter people’s perception and direct their attention to how these spaces are integral for city life. This exploration will be backed up by intensive technical tutorials introducing computational design and fabrication techniques and tools mainly Rhino, Grasshopper, Geco and Ecotect. Not only will this be the typical technical workshop, but rather you will also have the chance to be guided step by step on how these tools are used through out different design stages in a real world scenario. Design prototypes will be produced through 3D printing, the main workshop output will be a fabricated one to one functional model for one of the designs using our new in-house CNC machine. Tutors (check the PDF for bio): Olga Kovrikova, MArch DIA Alexandr Kalachev, MArch DIA Karim Soliman, MArch DIA Islam Ibrahim, MArch DIA Sherif Tarabishy, B.Sc. AAST Application: Application deadline 1 September 2013 ** For students (undergrad / Master), teachers and PhD proof of status is required (university ID with a date or a certificate of enrollment) to apply for the students package. Packages (choose one of the following in the application form): 1. Standard registration Course fee is 4250 EGP For Students 3500 EGP 2. Early bird registration discounted fee For Professionals 3750 EGP For Students 3000 EGP ** Early bird offer ends on 14 August 2013 3. Group registrations discounted fee (5 or more) For Students 20% off - You will have to fill out an application form here: http://goo.gl/0QxAga - You will need to submit your CV and Short Portfolio (max. 10 MB) to info@morph-d.com, email subject: “Morphing Norms Application” (we will decide if you are eligible for an early bird discount or not based on the date of your email submission) - We will confirm receiving emails from all applicants. Successful applicants will be contacted 5 days after each deadline (early bird/final) and will have to confirm participation within 3 days, if they fail to do so, places will be given to others on the waiting list. - A maximum of 30 applicants will be selected.
…