ponents, among other functionalities, is significantly widening the relevance of the toolset.
Meanwhile having used the tools for some time now and have gone through the forum, in my opinion a few critical system controls is still missing - unless I'm missing some understanding.
In order to really make the hourly energy analysis valuable in early massing studies etc. the consideration of indoor climate can be more detailed. The HVAC capacities, max. airrate and min. inlet temperature should be within comfortable ranges and hardsized by user input to reduce internal draft problems. If not considered I find that the analysis could possibly demonstrate good energy behavior and reasonable operative temperature but in reality could cause a bad indoor environment - and when "rectified" at a later stage the energy consumption will increase.
I would like to know how it is possible in HB to set-up a HVAC system with these ventilation controls and a "unlimited" convective/radiant heating system, and how to deal with the issues mentioned below. The inputs parameters exists in the components, but I can't seem to get the right system behaviour.
In the attached file I have gone through 4 scenaries, each with seperate issues in setting up the system (As no template appearantly supports the combined setup the heating system is simulated using an inlet temperature of 99 degrees).
HVACSystem: "ideal air loads" - Issue: no hardsized airrate, no cooling supply air temperature
HVACSystem: "VAV w. reheat" - Issue: no regulation of airrate, no use of input heat supply temperature in heating mode
HVACSystem: "idealairloadsystem" using "additionstrings" -> issue with duplicate zone names
HVACSystem: "idealairloadsystem" using "additionstrings" on multiple zones -> issue with duplicate zone names
Thanks a lot!
Jon…
tract subsets, be sure you always perform the same actions on a list of increasing numbers. So, before you start to manipulate a list of 100 points, create a list of 100 integers (0, 1, 2, ..., 99) and make sure it gets mutilated in the exact same way as the pointlist.
Then, when all your points are modified, bring them all into the same list again and sort that list using the integer array as keys. This ought to put them back into the right order.
2) Reverse Engineering: since you know all your points are along well defined curves (lines in your case), you could project them all onto a line that spans the entire model. This will give you a list of curve parameters (floating point numbers). You can then sort your points once again, but this time using the parameters as keys. (See image: by sorting all the points using the curve parameters, you get the order in which they appear from left to right)
2b) If you need to do this thing on points which are in a grid (i.e. 2D sorting), you have to project onto a surface so you get uv parameters for every point. Then vastly multiply only the u (or only the v) values, since you want to give rows (or columns) a higher weighting. Finally add u and v together and this will give you another list of floating point numbers which can be used as a keys array in a sort operation.…
st sampled into data trees (if not we must "add" them "manually" == code: get this item from Rhino and put it there) into collections.
2. Then we must perform some kind of selection(s) on a per individual item basis and THAT is in 99% of cases "manual" (== code) or on a per "global basis" (hard or soft clusters et all == code). If clusters are hierarchical and some kind of dendrogram is required ... this obviously means ... er ... more code.
3. Doing the 2 we use some kind of input by means of sliders (say pairs of 2: for branches and items) and therefor MAY their values cause slider control issues (== code). For instance IF this slider yields a x event > do this and that to some other sliders.
4. Then perform the "histogram" required and obviously treat this as just a variant (i.e. a possible solution out of a given collection witch is variable) meaning ways to "store" this into parameter(s) (as persistent data). This also requires code.
In a nutshell (and oversimplified): given a collection of "shapes" pick some make the histogram, store the result (or do something with that and store the outcome as well) recall some other for any reason, modify it, stored it ... and then repeat until the end of time (or worst: until you are out of espresso).
As I said: NOT a task for a novice AND NOT a task for someone not familiar with code matters (But I guess that you qualify in both areas, he he).
I do this type of things day in day out (but for real-life AEC purposes) therefor I could make a "simple demo" (add some "" more) but ... well ... you are warned, he he
But in case that you take the wrong decision (you are warned) we must use Skype a bit.…
finite element line with
start point
end point
id
cross-section (optional)
local coordinate system (optional)
some property (optional)
some other property (optional)
additional settings (optional)
etc
Now in 99% of the cases, users will only specify the first 4 parameters and leave the others blank. I'm not a huge fan of to many inputs so to clean up the canvas/components, I thought about exposing the optional parameters only upon zooming in on the component.
So far I've sometimes added a secondary component with more inputs to specify a list of additional settings (similar to the "settings" panel that exists/existed in Kangaroo), but this I find rather messy.
Alternatively I guess I could quite happily live with exposing the additional parameters at the click of a button. This I can do with the ZUI as it is written? I still need to get my head round what's what in this happy world of the canvas' third dimension...
…
ut only one list of indices(i).
Equal numbers of lists of items and indices.
Which I think probably covers 99% of usage. However for the optimizations to kick in the wrap input has to be either 1 value, or a single list of values, or equally many lists of values as the i input.
I can't just upload the maths.gha file for you to test as this optimization required a change in grasshopper.dll (I needed a way to inform the component base class to stop to try and solve it for every item in (i) whenever I treat the (i) input as a datatree. I can send you an official installer later though (after lots and lots of internal testing) so you can see if it works for you.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com…
Added by David Rutten at 5:29am on February 15, 2014
ve an adequately low value for vibration. Script all runs fine and matches expected results for a few test cases. Phew. Note that in excel form this calculation runs over 6000 cells of look up's and arrays, it's not a trivial calc that can practically be rearranged to make it work back from an acceptable value.
But in my results I have 99 sets of vibration-acceptable outcomes, which I'd now like to examine to see which one uses the least material in its particular combination of beam thicknesses, slab thicknesses and other stuff to find the overall most efficient system. The plan at the moment is to copy the solver Record over into Excel, extract the %'s for the different variables and post-process the info to sort the acceptable outcomes by weight.
It feels like there must be a better way that avoids taking the data out and having a gap in the parametric thinking. Is there a way to ask Galapagos to give me all (or at least, loads of) combinations for which R < 8 and then test those for the minimum weight? Can I automatically take the winning results from fitness test 1 out into an array of data that feeds into a second fitness test in the same grasshopper space? …
gain profits falls in the latter category.
The challenge here is to do the job (up to a point) using "anodyne" ways at the cost of providing slow, incomplete and quite inefficient solutions.
That said this specific vault case requires addressing 4 "classes" of problems (for instance: regions due to ccx events or alternatively circuits in graphs etc etc).
Back to business:
Creating a realistic "random" W truss of that type is one of the most challenging tasks in parametric adventures (in fact ... is the top dog by some miles). One of the many issues is an approach to manage "on-the-fly" clash situations by individually modifying nodes (without been sure that you can arrive to an all overall valid solution). Since one "path" tried may yield dead-end(s) this means keeping track of your corrective actions in a hierarchical manner and been able to follow a different "path". Another (obvious) issue is to use instance definitions for all the "components" thus achieving almost real-time response (try to manage 100K++ "solids" [sleeves, cones etc etc] to see what I mean) ... etc etc.
The big thing is: what are you going to tell to your instructors about the required code part? (that 99% mentioned) And if a "complete" solution is primarily based on "black boxes" could - in the instructor's eyes - your Master Thesis qualify as yours?
That said Vaults_V1 is achievable solely via components.…
ostly via C# because ... er ... the remaining 99% (how to do some real-life canopy and/or a real-life truss out of the relaxed line graph) is only doable via code - no ExoW/IL (so ... the 1% is indeed doable).
At first ... just double click the Kangaroo1 engine, halt the simulation AND ONLY THEN redirect the resulting line list to the ExoW/IL. As delivered neither is active.
Note: ExoW and/or IntraLattice MAY or MAY NOT work (each one has his own issues, but ExoW despite the glitches yields way better looking liquid stuff). So the liquid root may or may not be the holly grail that you expect (life sucks).
Note: As is delivered this only does a liquid node load bearing structure (ideal for Planet Utopia). Paint the thing black, do some proper pavement, populate with birds of pray, wait for the envelope def (that's freaky), put humans inside, lock the doors > massacre.
…
.0004. [1 of 7] Writing simulation parameters...5. [2 of 6] No context surfaces...6. [3 of 6] Writing geometry...7. [4 of 6] Writing materials and constructions...8. [5 of 7] Writing schedules...9. [6 of 7] Writing loads and ideal air system...10. [7 of 7] Writing outputs...11. ...... idf file is successfully written to : c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\unnamed.idf12. 13. Analysis is running!...14. c:\ladybug\unnamed\EnergyPlus\eplusout.csv15. ......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
16. 17. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.2.7-777c1f8d79, YMD=2015.02.28 16:09,IDD_Version 8.2.718. 19. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.20. 21. ** Warning ** Version: in IDF="'8.2.7'" not the same as expected="8.2"22. 23. ** Warning ** ManageSizing: For a zone sizing run, there must be at least 1 Sizing:Zone input object. SimulationControl Zone Sizing option ignored.24. 25. ** Warning ** ManageSizing: For a plant sizing run, there must be at least 1 Sizing:Plant object input. SimulationControl Plant Sizing option ignored.26. 27. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1228. 29. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_12_GLZ_1230. 31. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_2532. 33. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_25_GLZ_2534. 35. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_2836. 37. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_28_GLZ_2838. 39. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_940. 41. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_9_GLZ_942. 43. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1044. 45. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_10_GLZ_1046. 47. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1148. 49. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_11_GLZ_1150. 51. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1552. 53. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_15_GLZ_1554. 55. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_2456. 57. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_24_GLZ_2458. 59. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_2560. 61. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_25_GLZ_2562. 63. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3064. 65. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_30_GLZ_3066. 67. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3268. 69. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_32_GLZ_3270. 71. ** Severe ** GetHTSubSurfaceData: Surface Openings have too much area for base surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3472. 73. ** ~~~ ** Opening Surface creating error=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34_GLZ_3474. 75. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.94495E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_076. 77. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.84753E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_178. 79. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.16905E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_380. 81. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.96186E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_482. 83. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.37373E-005], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_684. 85. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.35824E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_786. 87. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[5.86549E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_888. 89. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.63765E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1090. 91. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-8.09566E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1292. 93. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.51701E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1394. 95. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.29917E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1596. 97. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.94451E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_1698. 99. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.03294E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_17100. 101. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.83026E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_18102. 103. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.29917E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_20104. 105. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.19851E-005], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_21106. 107. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.63765E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_23108. 109. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-4.05899E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_25110. 111. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.35824E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_27112. 113. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-9.91146E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_28114. 115. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.70158E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_29116. 117. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.22781E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_30118. 119. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.67821E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_33120. 121. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.22737E-004], Surface=F73533B3C6894C67936B_GLZP_34122. 123. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.65634E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_0124. 125. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.70736E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_1126. 127. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[3.42507E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_3128. 129. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[5.89276E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_4130. 131. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.91146E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_6132. 133. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[9.71205E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_7134. 135. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.34494E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_8136. 137. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.60159E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_9138. 139. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-1.11946E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_10140. 141. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.41257E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_11142. 143. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-8.21483E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_15144. 145. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[2.65716E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_16146. 147. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.84044E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_17148. 149. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[7.12297E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_19150. 151. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.14324E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_22152. 153. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.88887E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_23154. 155. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-9.89060E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_24156. 157. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-1.14849E-003], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_25158. 159. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[4.00479E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_27160. 161. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[6.63061E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_28162. 163. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[1.09018E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_29164. 165. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.49326E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_30166. 167. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-3.17446E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_32168. 169. ** Warning ** GetSurfaceData: Very small surface area[8.60686E-004], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_33170. 171. ** Severe ** GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.48515E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34172. 173. ** Fatal ** GetSurfaceData: Errors discovered, program terminates.174. 175. ...Summary of Errors that led to program termination:176. 177. ..... Reference severe error count=24178. 179. ..... Last severe error=GetSurfaceData: Zero or negative surface area[-2.48515E-005], Surface=4BDFD67E6D0E486796CC_GLZP_34180. 181. ************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).182. 183. ************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.184. 185. ************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.186. 187. ************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 2 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.188. 189. ************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 41 Warning; 24 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 1.51sec190.…
ng (It's a bit similar to the Knapsack problem):
I have a Variable --> XandI Have fix numbers (can we call "pieces") 9,12,15,18
I'd like to reach the X, with the summing of these numbers and using the minimum pieces ,it can't be lower than X, but it can be higher, maximum with 3.After this it has to found the most optimal combination which mostly use the same pieces
E.G.
X=98
The wrong solution is like = 1pcs of 18 = 9pcs of 9
Sum of pieces are 10
OR
= 3pcs of 18 = 1pcs of 15 = 1pcs of 12 = 2pcs of 9
Sum of pieces are 7
The right solution in this case = 5pcs of 18 = 1pcs of 9
(5*18)+(1*9)=99 it's good beacuse it's over with maximum 3 and uses the minimum pieces
Then it sends to a list like18 : 5pcs15 : 0pcs12 : 0pcs9 : 1pcsCan somebody help me ? Or is it possible to make this ?
Thank you…
Added by Petrik Kollár at 1:09am on November 10, 2017