are on their own paths, but the first branch contains 3 curves and the second one 2 curves. If you want the same result for all pairs of curves you'd need to split up the first and second branches, so that all curves are on their own branch.…
Added by Lars Renklint at 4:33am on September 6, 2009
EC
1. Between hours 1:00 to 24:002. Current document units is in Meters3. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.0004. [1 of 7] Writing simulation parameters...5. [2 of 6] No context surfaces...6. [3 of 6] Writing geometry...7. [4 of 6] Writing materials and constructions...8. [5 of 7] Writing schedules...9. [6 of 7] Writing loads and ideal air system...10. [7 of 7] Writing outputs...11. ...... idf file is successfully written to : c:\ladybug\Freeformtower_IDF\EnergyPlus\Freeformtower_IDF.idf12. 13. Analysis is running!...14. ......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
15. 16. Program Version,EnergyPlus-Windows-64 8.1.0.009, YMD=2015.04.04 23:39,IDD_Version 8.1.0.00917. 18. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:19. 20. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...21. 22. ************* 577 Zone,23. 24. ************* Only last 1 lines before error line shown.....25. 26. ************* 578 Freeformbuilding27. 28. ** Warning ** IP: IDF line~578 Comma being inserted after:" Freeformbuilding" in Object=ZONE29. 30. ** Severe ** Out of range value Numeric Field#5 (Type), value=0.00000, range={>=1 and <=1}, in ZONE=FREEFORMBUILDING31. 32. ************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:33. 34. ************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...35. 36. ************* 586 BuildingSurface:Detailed,7341.
…
9 8 7 6
5 4 3 2 1 0
I am triangulating this surface. I want to select just the red vertices. As you can note, I just need the inner vertices of this surface. I could do it mannually, but if I want to change the mesh density later, I will have to pick all of them manually again later.
Can someone help me?
Tks
…
pen Brep"; I didn't know it worked on flat surfaces. And I think it's only fair to include in your benchmark the considerable time 'SUnion' takes in this example: 21.9 seconds for 121 rings and likely much more with 400 or 1,000+ rings.
Then I noticed the pattern doesn't match. Checked the circles and they are the same. The distance between them, however, is different: 7 instead of 6. When I change that value to 6, the Python fails badly. All the holes and gaps are gone, which destroys the pattern:
I can't do the "two phase" approach on an 11 X 11 grid, but I can do 6 X 6 and 2 X 2 to get a 12 X 12 grid (40 'SUnion' operations) in 28 seconds total. That beats your benchmark of ~37 seconds for an 11 X 11 grid, if you include the 'SUnion' in your code.
…
onsecutive points at the same height then your 'Break at discontinuities' component eliminates the middle point completely and then the 'Interpolate Curve' component gives a much bigger bump in the wrong direction. This was enough to get curves to meet from opposite sides.
I fixed this by changing the heights to 1.1 or 2.9, rather than 1.0 and 3.0, but it took a little while to work it out! Sigh.
I attach a new version. But I actually preferred it as it was before. See what you think!
Bob
p.s. in the first list, elements 11, 12, 23 and 24 go from 1 to 3; elements 17 and 18 go from 3 to 1. In the second list, elements 6, 17, 18 and 29 go from 1 to 3; elements 12 and 23 go from 3 to 1. Given the above fix, these can be easily seen.…
Added by Bob Mackay at 10:40pm on November 24, 2015