Search Results - 河北11选5走势开奖结果查询-『9TBH·COM』排列5彩乐乐预测--2023年3月19日7时1分43秒.H5c2a3.drt5fhf55-gov-hk

Event: Modellazione Parametrica: rendo posizioni lavorative fino a qualche tempo fa impensabili. Questo nuovo approccio ha infatti la caratteristica di avvicinarsi alla programmazione informatica, ma con un approccio facilitato grazie ai componenti visuali.Hai bisogno di un motivo in più per usare Grasshopper? Eccolo! Trattandosi di uno strumento ancora in fase di testing (anche se perfettamente funzionante) l’applicativo è completamente gratuitoScarica la tua versione e inizia subito ad usarlo!Corsi certificatiLe lezioni sono tenute da Antoni(n)o Marsala, docente certicato McNeel, con alle spalle oltre 5 anni di esperienza nell’insegnamento di Rhinoceros. Negli ultimi anni abbiamo tenuto in grande considerazione l’evolversi di questo plugin e abbiamo deciso di investire sulle sue potenzialità.Nel Febbraio del 2011, grazie ad Antoni(n)o Marsala, è uscito Algoritmi Generativi, edizione italiana del libro di Zubin Khabazi Generative Algorithms with Grasshopper. Entrami sono scaricabili gratuitamente e rappresentano dei validi strumenti per capire il mondo di Grasshopper.Da diversi mesi inoltre, il Mandarino BLU, ha attivato una collaborazione con La Bottega di Galileo di Pisa, officina del libero scambio di idee, presentando dei progetti formativi post universitari, per coloro che vogliono entrare nel mondo della progettazione di nuova generazione.Dalla collaborazione con Multiverso, nasce invece un progetto formativo più ampio sviluppato a Firenze in via Campo d’Arrigo 40rLeggi il nostro programma didattico o scarica la versione in pdf…; Added by Antonino Marsala at 3:16am on January 10, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'DIVA components disappear from canvas upon re-open...': I am starting to wonder if I have some sort of mismatch between my GHA file and my Diva version, though I'm not sure that would cause these kinds of problems. Incidentally, I tried creating a brand new file and I get the same results. I cannot save anything with DIVA components in them, they disappear every time. :( Speaking of 2.0, do you happen to know when that will be released? Thanks, Marc info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read info: Plugin version: 0.8.0066 info: Object list read error: Component DIVA Daylight Analysis for GH {4ec4ef63-a2e3-4501-891c-dc1107bdd94d} failed to deserialize itself: Method not found: 'Boolean Grasshopper.Kernel.GH_ComponentParamServer.ReadParameterTypeData(GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader)'. error: Component Material {842f969a-3d16-4b32-9aaf-d996bd25181a} failed to deserialize itself: Method not found: 'Boolean Grasshopper.Kernel.GH_ComponentParamServer.ReadParameterTypeData(GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader)'. error: Component Construction Assembly {2f4beddf-fda7-4852-9820-c36101cd316d} failed to deserialize itself: Method not found: 'Boolean Grasshopper.Kernel.GH_ComponentParamServer.ReadParameterTypeData(GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader)'. error: Component Fixed Shade {cc5c1712-3cb4-4e91-b322-ebc050a75c3f} failed to deserialize itself: Method not found: 'Boolean Grasshopper.Kernel.GH_ComponentParamServer.ReadParameterTypeData(GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader)'. error: Component Read Saved Thermal Results {b71b827f-7e12-42a8-a44a-a9ebb1da1596} failed to deserialize itself: Method not found: 'Boolean Grasshopper.Kernel.GH_ComponentParamServer.ReadParameterTypeData(GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader)'. error: Component Viper: Thermal Analysis for GH {8a8fd0f2-dcd8-4c3c-83dd-d74baf8dcaba} failed …; Added by Marc Syp at 10:03am on February 7, 2012

Comment on: Group 'Chameleon': installed WinXP Rhino 4 and 5. …; Added by fernando molas garcia to Chameleon at 10:47am on May 6, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Geco - UserProblems': k ecotect; and 'export mesh to ecotect' usually auto link, but my computer won't link. Please help out. please post such request in our group so we get an request email, thx. For your problem you have to use the newest geco v1.033 and grasshopper v09.0012 or higher. This will solve your problem. If you use grasshopper for rhino 5 we will release a updated version which also works for this. currently you have to copy the files manually to the components folder thx.... After installed the new version of grasshopper geco, here is error again Error: solution exception: Could not load file or assembly 'Geolink, Version=2.1.563.0, Culture= neutral, Public KeyToken=bull' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. Here is the error on ' Link Ecotect (EcoLink) ' in grasshopper geco. Urgent!!! Please help! PLEASE IDENTIFY which files copy manually from where to components folder? thanks…; Added by jc1988 to [uto] tools Plug-ins at 9:45am on November 29, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Bake objects with GhPython': ok at the various available ways to reference geometry and data in ghPython: ghdoc is the standard document for rhinoscriptsyntax. We can use it all the time and it is meant to be as quick as possible, in order to slow down rhinosciptsyntax in Grasshopper as little as possible. It is also possible to just reference or create geometry in memory using RhinoCommon methods. The third and last document is the usual Rhino document, which is also accessible in ghPython: Rhino.RhinoDoc.ActiveDoc. All these three styles are valid and useful for certain purposes and code writing styles. Specifically, you are asking to take data from ghdoc, obtain the geometry, and finally add it to the Rhino document. This is essentially baking in ghPython, right? I am attaching an example. When you have a document available and a Guid, you can use rhinoscriptsyntax.coerceXXX(guid) in order to obtain geometry, or specific types of geometry. Similarly, scriptcontext.doc.Objects.AddXXX() allows to add geometry to the document. There are lots of variants for this. You can refer to the RhinoCommon documentation for all methods in the ObjectTable class, or all methods in the ghPython one are on GitHub. Please let me know if you need more information. I hope this is helpful, Giulio-- Giulio Piacentinofor Robert McNeel & Associatesgiulio@mcneel.com bake_into_rhino.gh, 5 KB…; Added by Giulio Piacentino at 4:48am on October 14, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'Kangaroo Form Finding & Planarization': s lectured at my university; one of his projects is a free-form shell pavilion, based off of the finger-locking joinery of sand dollars. He has a great time-lapse video of the form finding process on his website, which is worth a watch if you haven't seen it already. It appears as if he uses Galapagos or some other evolutionary approach for his solution. When I saw that Daniel Piker replicated this using only Kangaroo, I was thrilled. I believe that in order to get smoother, less clumsy results from the PlanarHex, it is almost necessary to ensure that your setup is conducive for the definition to work. I think this includes beginning the definition with the hexagons having the ability to be EITHER concave or convex (Lunchbox). In Daniel's script, I think he set the default value at .5, which was in the middle of the two options and resembled a square. I think also that the number of hexagon cells in the U and V direction should be setup in a way that they can lend themselves to a proportion that is used later in the definition. Here is a quote from Piker that better explains the importance of the proportions and edge lengths in the setup: The ratio of U/V divisions need to be chosen so that the initial edge lengths are close to equal. When planarizing, particularly with hexagons, we need to ensure that the polygons do not become self intersecting. Here this is achieved by constraining the maximum and minimum edge lengths to some ratio of the overall average edge length. For this to work though, it helps if the initial state has them within or close to this range. [...] Judging from the photo you provided of your results from the PlanarHex, I think some of the issues may be a result of you having a mixture of trapeziums and hexagons. This could potentially be causing the mangled appearance of the resultant shell. Again, I do not know if this will be too much help for you as I am somewhat of a beginner with Kangaroo. But if nothing else, I hope that this can serve as a catalyst for what could be an interesting discussion about free-form vaults and shell structures... Also, check out the work of Philippe Block if you haven't. Here's a picture of a hexagonal vault model that he designed that is quite lovely. - William…; Added by William Carroll to Kangaroo at 10:29am on May 27, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'Ladybug- weather file': component that let you modify an existent .EPW file as you want, also just few hours or days or months of it. This is a preview of it. This new potential component creates a copy of Epw file automatically starting from an existing EPW file. In this case I modified dry bulb temperature from June to September, I added 5 °C to the original values. or you can create your own values, for example here I plugged random values. Or you can copy and paste your values from .xls column of a weather data into a panel component. All your modified files are stored into a folder that you want. I think should be useful a component like this. Anyway, I'll try to finish it as soon as possible. Best Antonello …; Added by Antonello Di Nunzio to Ladybug Tools at 2:37am on March 4, 2016

Comment on: Topic 'surface box onto custom surface split': n static. The eight initial curves are control point curves so that I can sculpt the overall building form according to other external data, and have the panels (and morphed geometry) adjust with the building's new form. Also, if I am to add floors, I need the panels to always have the same height in the z axis (as if the entire form is being contoured at a regular interval). The facade should automatically adjust if I pull the upper most controls up. For example, if I pull the upper control points of the curves up 20m, the facade would generate another 5 floors with a 4000m height each. Hope you can help me out. Thanks again! …; Added by Vuchio at 2:34pm on May 26, 2016

Comment on: Topic 'Image Sampler with surface': holes on each so speed increases). Zero radius circles are skipped. The image dimensions in pixels are defined in small panels (X=485, Y=759) and used to calculate height/width ratio. That is used to define height based on the 'X' slider (500), which defines width overall. The 'cell size' slider is also in units and determines resolution indirectly. For any given X value, increasing 'cell size' reduces the number of grid cells (resolution) and vice-versa. Independent of other parameters, 'Isotrim (SubSrf)' splits the base surface into sub-surfaces, onto which the circles are projected. The 'SrfSplit' does the heavy lifting (can be SLOW!) and finally, 'Sort' is used to select the resulting surfaces that contain the holes. Benchmarks: X = 500, cell size = 10, 3161 circlesnine subsurfaces: 'SrfSplit' = 6.6 minutes, 'Project' = 13 secs.16 subsurfaces: 'SrfSplit' = 2.3 minutes, 'Project' = 17 secs. X = 500, cell size = 5, 12542 circles (shown)35 surfaces: 'SrfSplit' = 30.6 minutes, 'Project' = 57 secs. As noted before, a very long-standing, well-known bug in Grasshopper fails to save the Image Sampler component when I save a copy of your file. Very annoying, but there is a work-around. Copy/paste and connect the Image Sampler from the code you posted above into the place I reserved for it. "Pro Tip": Always work at low-resolution until your algorithms are proven before cranking up to 10K+ geometry counts! Attached file has low resolution settings with 'Project' and 'SrfSplit' (red group) disabled.…; Added by Joseph Oster at 1:25pm on June 1, 2017

Topic: Render Mesh + gradient with Vray: it doesn't work, the gradient out of 4 colors won't be mapped on the mesh, only one color. I also decomposed the mesh and rebuild it again. No solution! If I use another method to map a gradient on the mesh (think it is done by TAZ) it works like the one overhere:But rendering the above one with Vray ends in a completele white object. If I render it with the Rhino or Raytraced Neon Plugin renderer it gives a good result. Ok why not doing it with them?! Because I want it to do with Vray, I prefer it. Next step I tried, I made me some gradient colors as texture in the Vray Materials and want them to assign to the baked object. Rendering with Vray gives me the same result! only one color is on it. Ok, last I tried was I took a rhino object and converted it to a mesh assigned the Vray gradient material on it and rendered it for testing and voilà it worked. In the pic below you can see the attempts. The two objects on the left use the same gradient as texture but only the cube is rendered like it should be, both are meshs voronoi is a GH mesh, cube is a Rhino mesh. So my question, whyyyyyyy??? What is the difference between the baked mesh out of GH in compare to the one I did in Rhino? Do I have to do some further adjustements like mapping in rhino before doing it or, aah I don't know, ... it might be a little stupid thing but I would be thankfull for any answer cause it took me half the night and a bottle of wine trying to understand the problem. And please a easy solution I got a headache don't know why! ;) Thanks for any help!!! :) I use Rhino 5 and a demoversion of the new Vray but the same problems exist in rhino 4 an the older Vray.…; Added by Sebastian L. at 4:44am on May 18, 2012