)
3. KeyError(1417,)
4. KeyError(1417,)
5. KeyError(1417,)
6. KeyError(1417,)
7. KeyError(1417,)
8. KeyError(1417,)
9. KeyError(1417,)
10. KeyError(1417,)
11.......
i tried different weather file but also same result. it seems i have same problem. the file am working on is the radiation file i took from the examples . whats seems to be the problem?
thank you for your time…
ee 3)
{5}
0 15
{6}
0 16
And I want to place points at every possible combination of these coordinates, treating Tree 1 as X coordinates, Tree 2 as Y coordinates, and Tree 3 as Z coordinates. Also, I would like the list of points to be a tree with paths corresponding to the coordinates. Wouldn't it be nice if I could plug these trees into a Point XYZ, with a new "branch cross reference" method, and get the following result?
{0:3:5}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{0:3:6}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{0:4:5}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{0:4:6}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{1:3:5}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{1:3:6}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{1:4:5}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{1:4:6}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{2:3:5}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{2:3:6}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{2:4:5}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{2:4:6}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 16.0}
In this form of cross referencing, every combination of individual branches from the different lists is used as separate input, and the output for each combination is put onto a branch in the result whose path is the concatenation of the input branch paths used.…
Added by Andy Edwards at 7:03pm on November 3, 2009
erations, is not it?
This is what I finally want and how I plan to do it:
In the starting tree, points are listed accordingly to the (11) 4-side-panels they belong to. I need to do a tree where each of the 11 lists contains not the points composing the panels but the points code of the points composing the panels. the point code is the number in the flattened list that refers to the points (like, panel 1 is made of points n 0,1,4,18, and so on). To do this, I suppose that I will use my tree of 11 lists of 33 true-false values, and apply it to cull 11 times a series of numbers from 0 to 32. I ll post it if it works!…
r surfaces by EP results' components.
Having set a period from 9:00 to 19:00 for a single day (10th december), and using a slider from 0 to 10 (11 values, 0 is 9:00), the following mismatch occurs:
setting value 0 works for surface temperature but not for mean radiant temperature (warning says "stepofSimulation is outside the bounds of the comfResultMTX", but I do have 11 values from radiant temp matrix).
setting value 1 is rendered as "hour 2 of simulation" for surface temperature (FIG 1) and as "9:00" of radiant temperature (FIG 2).
It seems there is a slide of 1 hour. How should I interpret this?
Kind regards,
artemátyika…
Added by artemátyika at 3:34pm on February 2, 2019