rcle A 0---1---2Circle B 0---1---2---3---4---5---6---7---8---9---10---11I was actually trying to connect through separated lines, point (A,0) to (B,11) and (B,1),point (A,1) to point (B,3) and (B,5), and (A,2) to (B,7) and (B,9).I was able to do it using a list item selecting the points and creating a line between them, but i would be to long to do it if i would like to divide in many more points, and try to connect them using list item... i went looking around for a bit, i think its possible to do it with a path mapper or a flip matrix, althought i have no clue how to make it.
You will find enclosed, some screenshots...If anyone could give me any tip, i thank you all in advance.Have a nice day.+Joan…
Added by Joan tarragon at 7:38am on December 5, 2011
I've attached a rh and ghx file. http://we.tl/ghsd0UTxji - wetransfer link. I'm guessing the trick is to correctly define the Range (R) / Domain in the Random component, so that the circles' radi can vary between the fixed and static domain of 10 or 12 or 14 or 18 or 20. Meaning that the radi can only be 10, 12, 14, 18 or 20 - and not, lets say.. 11, 13, 15, 16, 17 or 19 for that matter. Thanks in advance, i hope someone can figure it out, because i can't seem to find anything online about how to set up such as specific domain.
…
idually and by group
3) Clean up functions to discard failed results
4) Use generated images using windows directories to delete designs (so you can bring one next to each other and discard similar ones)
5) Hide irrelevant parameters
6) View generated images in zoom
7) Individually set limits on filter parameters (using sliders)
8) Reload CAD file without having to close and open genoform
9) Much smaller UI (we want to allow the screen for design work, so the functionalities have been made into pop-ups).
10) Navigate in view to a desired design (by number)
11) Any other features our users want ? (let us know)
We hope that this version is much more easier to use and allows designers to manage what they wish to generate section by section or layer by layer.…
ult, my 3dm is very large.
Another problem, when the fonction is ok, the draw in grasshopper is ok, when i bake i have only a litte part of the opération.....
If you could help me, thank you
[Edit] Here the description in the null item :
{0;0}0. Brep: brep.m_T[43047] trim is not valid. trim.m_type = seam, the edge is manifold, but brep.m_L[trim.m_li=1114].m_type is not outer.brep.m_L[1114] loop is not valid. brep.m_T[loop.m_ti[21]=43047] is not valid.brep.m_F[0] face is not valid. brep.m_L[face.m_li[1114]=1114] is not valid.ON_Brep.m_F[0] is invalid.1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. …
onsecutive points at the same height then your 'Break at discontinuities' component eliminates the middle point completely and then the 'Interpolate Curve' component gives a much bigger bump in the wrong direction. This was enough to get curves to meet from opposite sides.
I fixed this by changing the heights to 1.1 or 2.9, rather than 1.0 and 3.0, but it took a little while to work it out! Sigh.
I attach a new version. But I actually preferred it as it was before. See what you think!
Bob
p.s. in the first list, elements 11, 12, 23 and 24 go from 1 to 3; elements 17 and 18 go from 3 to 1. In the second list, elements 6, 17, 18 and 29 go from 1 to 3; elements 12 and 23 go from 3 to 1. Given the above fix, these can be easily seen.…
Added by Bob Mackay at 10:40pm on November 24, 2015
nt operation does not leave me a tree with a branch for each curve.
I want to have a branch for each curve, and this branch should have the points that were projected to it. BUT with the original curve structure. This is 37 branches with 11 curves per branch.
I thought about points in curve, sorting by the point on the curve. But its not working as expected.... Some points that are clearly on a curve are left out.
Thanks for any help
Shynn…
number of divisions on that curve as in the defintion (i.e. by 4). The offset in the def is slightly different and should cull two or three more curves as in the lists that show my aim below.
Basically I want to look into each branch of the groups of points from each closed curve . Marking in a list whether it contains a one or a zero (0= outside 1 = coincidents).
{0;0}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;1} 0. 01. 22. 03. 2 {0;2}0. 01. 02. 03. 0 {0;3}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;4}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;5}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;6}0. 01. 22. 23. 1 {0;7}0. 21. 22. 03. 0 {0;8}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;9}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;10}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;11}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;12}0. 21. 22. 23. 2 {0;13}0. 01. 22. 23. 0 {0;14}0. 21. 22. 23. 2
I want to create a list from these points. That marks each curve that pokes out, in a cull pattern as such:
20022210222202
Using a 1 where there are co-incidents in the curve points and the boundary. A 2 for true (outside points) and a 0 for containment. So I might be able to use the 1 in future developments - however if a true false list is easiest I can live with that.
So could I use F(x) function? - to look for 0 or 1's in each bunch of points and thus list as such for a cull pattern? or will Path mapper help me here? Or can I rely on simply grafting and splitting??
I am usure of the neatest solution and would love to learn. Hope you can direct me.rgrds
J.…
1) to each length. For example you have a length of ten and you create a domain from 9 to 11. later you want to group all lines by as less as possible domains.
If you have a look to the image...you see 6 lines and their red dotted ranges. to group them by the domain of 3 and 5 would be the best result with the less domains. (here 2)
if you would use the domain of line 0,1 or 3 you could not include line 4 and you would have 3 instead of just 2 groups.....
later on it is important for me to group as much as possible lines in less as possible domains.
I hope this is somehow understandable.…
Added by horst Becker at 11:15am on November 2, 2013