d the obvious, he he).
2. Either attempt to get planar modules (via Kangaroo1/2). For instance K2 can quite effectively achieve planarity on quads > then your modules are rather easy to "derive" on a per quad basis.
3. Or (more complex in manufacturing) compose your modules out of planar "trapezes" (8 per module = 16 per double combo). This gives you far more freedom at the cost of assembling them properly. If (theoretically) these are made via some "large" scale 3d printing that is not a big issue ... but you don't have this option anyway.
BTW: within a scale of 1 to 10 rate your experience with GH.…
the most advanced surfacing commands. In addition, you'll learn concepts and features of Grasshopper at an accelerated pace in an instructor-led hands-on instruction environment. The advantages of using Grasshopper in preliminary design and concept development come to life since the students will be able to create their models on a 3D printer and a laser machine.
…
o optimize a point cloud to limit the size of these connections to 5 or 10 different lenghts without becoming regular? In order to have a 3d line network consisting of a limited number of line families.
Thanks,
Oliver
…