etc.
Group 2 - 1, 6, 11, 16, 21 etc.
Group 3 - 2, 7, 12, 17, 22 etc.
Group 4 - 3, 8, 13, 18, 23 etc.
Group 5 - 4, 9, 14, 19, 24 etc. "
except in data, the branches start at 0, so 'group 1' is branch 0
as for the order of your points, that depends on the input prior sorting...
yrs …
branches in each A's list of B's, or remove its ends etcso that if I want to remove the last B in every A{0;1},{0;2},{0;3},{0;4},{0;5},{0;6}{1;1},{1;2},{1;3},{1;4}{2;1},{2;2},{2;3},{2;4},{2;5}would become{0;1},{0;2},{0;3},{0;4},{0;5}
{1;1},{1;2},{1;3}
{2;1},{2;2},{2;3},{2;4}I guess the question is do I need to figure out the cull pattern- each B may have different lengths...…
cenPt As New On3dPoint(0, 0, 0)
Dim tSphere As New OnSphere
Dim rad As Double = 5.0
tSphere.Create(cenPt, rad)
Dim nSphere As New OnNurbsSurface
tSphere.GetNurbForm(nSphere)
Dim tSrf As New OnNurbsSurface
Dim ptList As New List (Of On3dPoint)
ptList.Add(New On3dPoint(-5, -5, 0))
ptList.Add(New On3dPoint(-5, 5, 0))
ptList.Add(New On3dPoint(5, 5, 0))
ptList.Add(New On3dPoint(5, -5, 0))
tSrf = RhUtil.RhinoCreateSurfaceFromCorners(ptList(0), ptList(1), ptList(2), ptList(3))
Dim arrCrv(0) As OnCurve
RHUtil.RhinoIntersectSurfaces(nSphere, tSrf, tol, arrCrv, Nothing)
A = arrCrv…
I have this :
list 3 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 2 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 1 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
list 0 : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
and I want to group the points of index 0 in a branch, the points of index 1 in another branch and so on.
I attached a file in which I generated the points.
Thank you in advance for your help !
Regards
Red…
r itself is compiled against .NET 3·5.
I recommend you use Rhino4, .NET 3·5 and VS 2008 as a debugging platform.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
For example.
If you have two lists of points.
List A List B
{0;0;0}(0) {0;0}(0)
{0;0;1}(0) {0;1}(0)
{0;2}(0)
{0;3}(0)
{0;4}(0)
And you want to merge the two lists so that the two points in list A are the end points.
Merge Lists Results:
{0;0}(0)
{0;0;0}(0)
{0;0;1}(0)
{0;1}(0)
{0;2}(0)
{0;3}(0)
{0;4}(0)
Because of their path structures the order is wrong from a simple merge so Flattening now is out of the question.
Path Mapper
{A;B} --> {A;B+1}
{A;B;C} --> {A;C*6}
---------------------
Results:
{0;0} --> {0;0+1} = {0;1}
{0;1} --> {0;1+1} = {0;2}
{0;2} --> {0;2+1} = {0;3}
{0;3} --> {0;3+1} = {0;4}
{0;4} --> {0;4+1} = {0;5}
{0;0;0} --> {0;0*6} = {0;0}
{0;0;1} --> {0;1*6} = {0;6}
Now with the Path Structures similar when they are re-ordered the results will have the two points of list A as the end points.
Question 2
why did the curve-line intersection lose the path structure? Both trees had 38 branches.
Both trees had 38 Paths but Tree A had more Items, 147 compared to 38 in Tree B.
So you get this happening:
{0;0;0;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;0}(0) results: Null {0;0;0;0;0;0}(0)
Base result paths on longest
{0;0;1;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;1}(0) results: Null {0;0;1;0;0;0}(0)
{0;0;2;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;2}(0) results: Yes {0;0;2;0;0;0;0}(0)
Add a branch to contain result
{0;0;3;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;3}(0) results: Yes {0;0;3;0;0;0;0}(0)
{0;0;3;0;0;0}(1) compared to {0;0;0;3}(0) results: No {0;0;3;0;0;0;1}(0)
{0;0;4;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;4}(0) results: Yes {0;0;4;0;0;0;0}(0)
{0;0;4;0;0;0}(1) compared to {0;0;0;4}(0) results: Yes {0;0;4;0;0;0;1}(0)
{0;0;5;0;0;0}(0) compared to {0;0;0;5}(0) results: Yes {0;0;5;0;0;0;0}(0)
{0;0;5;0;0;0}(1) compared to {0;0;0;5}(0) results: Yes {0;0;5;0;0;0;1}(0)
{0;0;5;0;0;0}(2) compared to {0;0;0;5}(0) results: Yes {0;0;5;0;0;0;2}(0)
...... etc
…