iders that control the total amount ( U&V) and the branches are formed by picking i.e the U and the points will then be the number on the V slider...
I realize that this question may have been asked before, but I cannot solve it with the path mapper and it seems so easy
M…
eone would know how to group each data position from each branch ... meaning, for instance, that I have a list of data with 3 branches, each branch containing 28 data instances (see attached image). Now, how would I get the (0;0)+(1;0)+(2;0) to be grouped in a new branch, as well as (0;1)+(1;1)+(2;1) and so on?
Also, I need for the setup to able to take in variables, so that the 3 branches might change to 6, and the 28 data instances might to change to anything between 10 and 100.
Thanks in advance,
/Claus
…
s than 40% on average.2. 8gb usage is steady at 28% 3. I've been now looking at 2 blank white screen, in both Rhino and Grasshopper for well over 20 min. finally I went for a walk at 10:25am, (its a beautiful day why waste it looking at nonexistent calculations, It would help if there was a timing function in the code that would let me know how long the calculations were going to take, came back 11:25am still no results. Had to Quit Rhino in the Start manager.
I have used all sorts of window programs for well over 25 years. Rhino and Grasshopper are the only 2 programs that I have ever seen that show totally white screens in their operating windows :(
…
o retrieve the first one: (0;0), (0;1) ... (0;4), I put 0 in Path and the TreeBranch turns red. What am I doing wrong?
I would really appreciate some help!
Thankyou!…
Added by Tina Jerrera at 8:09am on November 25, 2016
vas
Closing and creating a new file (memory resets when this is done) @4:00, 5:57, 6:53
System slow down and crashes @ 8:16 (takes 5 minutes to end the process - perhaps not the most entertaining movie to watch until the end - a good point to turn the kettle on)…
es, and these sum up to ~7100. I shall see if I can post a screenshot of everything.
I have no idea how to script that, sorry. But maybe could be a more optimized workflow - just feed one object B at a time, maybe that makes the math behind it more relaxed.
I should emphasize that it is not about 'fault' in the operation, and rather a very slow calculation - the difference does eventually get calculated with no errors whatsoever, the only problem is the unbelievably inefficient, or unproductive time it takes to do so. I think the problem could be the proportion of the objects, one very large, and one very small (28 / 6 / .1cm vs. .05cm), maybe that does something funky to the bounding box calls, I have no idea. And one other thing I suspect is the number of faces in the object, as I progress to let's say 700 cuts, I have then created 700*4 new faces in the object. I don't know if this is indeed something of concern. …
Added by DumDaDaDum at 7:03am on September 29, 2011