will cover one of the latest and greatest topics from recent development. Although the webinars will be happening each Thursday around 12:30 Eastern Standard Time, registration will give you indefinite access to recordings of the webinars so that you can reference them when the time comes to apply them on your work!
The grand list of workshops is as follows:
1 - High-Quality Graphics, Visualizations and Animations with LadybugMarch 9th, 12:30 PM EST
2 - Brute Force Parametric Energy Modeling and Sensitivity Analyses in Early DesignMarch 23rd, 12:30 PM EST
3 - Wintertime Indoor Thermal Comfort Visualization - Eliminating Perimeter Heat with High-Performing FacadesMarch 30th, 12:30 PM EST
4 - Summertime Indoor Thermal Comfort Visualization - Setpoints and Blinds Up with Right Shade + ControlsApril 6th, 12:30 PM EST
5 - Condensation Modeling with HoneybeeApril 20th, 12:30 PM EST
6 - Urban Heat Island Modeling with DragonflyApril 27th, 12:30 PM EST
7 - Expanding Your Climate Data Sources with DragonflyMay 4th, 12:30 PM EST
8 - CFD Simulation with OpenFOAM, Rhino/Grasshopper and Butterfly (Advanced)May 11th, 12:30 PM EST
This series will have a similar arc as the one in the Fall, starting with basic topics and moving to advanced ones as we progress down the list. The first one will be accessible to all users regardless of prior experience and all of the workshops listed here will cover topics for which there is currently no tutorial video content. Hope that you can attend!…
e:
Modulo 1Il workshop è finalizzato a fornire ai partecipanti i fondamenti della modellazione parametrica e generativa attraverso Grasshopper, plug-in di programmazione visuale per Rhinoceros 3D (uno dei più diffusi modellatori NURBS per l‘architettura e il design). Il workshop mira a gestire e sviluppare il rapporto tra informazione e geometria lavorando sui sistemi di involucro in condizioni specifiche. La discretizzazione di superfici (pannellizazione sia Nurbs che Mesh), la modellazione delle geometrie attraverso informazioni (siano esse provenienti da dati di analisi ambientali, da mappe di colore o da database), l’estrazione e la gestione di informazioni richiedono la comprensione delle strutture dei dati al fine di definire un processo che va dalla progettazione alla costruzione.I partecipanti impareranno come costruire e sviluppare strutture di dati parametrici per informare geometrie ‘data-driven’ e come estrarre le informazioni rilevanti da tali modelli per il processo di costruzione.Modulo 2Il workshop, volto a promuovere le nuove tecnologie digitali di supporto alla progettazione e alla fabbricazione, fornirà ai partecipanti gli strumenti per la preparazione, attraverso Grasshopper, dei modelli per il processo di stampa 3d. Il workshop inoltre, darà ai partecipanti i fondamenti dell’uso della stampante 3d e si concluderà con la fabbricazione del proprio modello realizzato durante il corso.
[.] Date:Modulo 1 – 25/26/27 Luglio 2014 – SiracusaModulo 2 – 28/29 Luglio 2014 – Catania
[.] Tutors:Arch. Andrea Graziano (Co-de-iT)Arch. Salvo Pappalardo (Studio Aion)Arch. David Montenegro (Hackspace_Catania)
[.] Luogo:Modulo 1Officina Ermocrate – Viale Ermocrate 7, 96100 – SiracusaModulo 2Hackspace_Catania – Via Grotte Bianche, 112 – Catania
[more info]
…
archaic in it's whole structure. Good for some limited things but not too much fun in the long run in 2017.
Still I learned a lot here, some of it from you, and for that I'm very thankful! :-)Losing all that content is indeed bad.
But I personally can't see McNeel as "evil" while I have no problem seeing Autodesk as such. They killed XSI (my tool of choice for almost 10 years) and now plumb XSI ICE into Maya - no thanks.
I too can't see myself buying Rhino 6 ATM, since like you, I think it's a bit underwhelming in scope and the new licensing doesn't improve things.
At one point it's time to move on, even if it's hard and needs letting go of grudges - I can be just as emotional about software as you, but the energy spent on trying to make Rhino/Grasshopper into something it's not is simply wasted.
Thankfully I finally found a new home softwarewise, I went through many of the applications you mention but they all have their own flaws and limitations. SideFX at least have the right spirit, Houdini moves along joyfully, problems get fixed fast with daily builds, support is great, the software handles big assets easily and the combination of nodes and code (Python, VEX...) is a joy to use for my generative work. The community is amazingly helpful and communicates often on a very high level (for instance forums.Odforce.net). Works for me :-)
I wish you all the best in your journey and again, thank you for the insights I gained from your posts in the past.
Cheers,
Tom…
Added by Thomas Helzle at 10:37am on October 22, 2017
work. As payload it uses protocol buffers which is optimised for transport and storage, and is Google's lingua franca for data. It would be great to use it for extensibility in grasshopper.
As gRPC supports both C# and Python I didn't think it would take many lines of code, but I have so far failed to put it together. Could anyone please describe to me best practice is in such case, and/or want to collaborate on the project? I can picture an open repo on gitHub or similar.
My main qustions are:
Should I use C# or Python?
Can I use Visual Studio 2017? All the VS 2015 installers have failed on my computer.
Do I have to use Visual Studio, or can I get away with the built-in editor? What are the main limitations using one over the other?
Can I build Rhino5 GH components in VS2017? I have built a Rhino 6 GH component from the McNeel template, but it did not work when opened in Rhino 5 GH (currently only R6 templates are available for VS2017).
Can Rhino 5's old ironPython deal with the newer gRPC package?
What's the best way to do rapid iterations and version controll building GH comps?
TL;DR: I want to build a very simple gRPC.io client GH component, and appreciate all help I can get.
Many thanks, Martin…
思った感じになりません。
balls の代わりにplanarカーブを直接入れてみましたがエラーが出ます。
ファンクションにしてみたところ、forループので作った数値が反映されていません。
ファンクションのインスタンス?を出力していないと思い上記のようにしましたがエラーが出てしまいます。
以上の事から自分の認識が正しいのかよくわからなくなりました・・・
python自体の深いところをわかっているわけではないので余計こんがらがりました。
そこで、for b in ballsはどのような条件または使い方であれば使えるのでしょうか?
そして、上記のように別のオブジェクトに対しての使い方はどのようにすればできるのでしょうか?
2:同じファンクション内のdist = rs.Distance(self.pos,b.pos)についてですが
この文章も for b in balls によってbはBallのインスタンスであると定義?されたためb.posがbの位置であると分かるのでしょうか?
pythonは定義しなくても動いてしまうのでどのような時に使えるのか文章見ただけではよくわかりません・・・
大変細かいことかもしれませんが、よりpythonをしっかりと理解するためにも、どなたかわかる方ご教授いただけると幸いです。…
n get the correct results with cooling loads:
3. After I update LB+HB, a warning is given for the set EP construction component:
4. so I replaced it with the latest one (Feb 05, 2017):
5. Now the cooling loads is missing from the result for reason unknown ...
May I ask if the missing cooling loads is related to the latest update of LB+HB? What component update is causing this problem?
BTW, I'm using Singapore's epw file, and for a tropical city, there should be no heating energy at all. So, sth clearly is wrong over here ...
Thanks.
…