ep is to understan the logics of what you want to do, in your case, build 4 point surfaces (u also need to know the right direction to build the surfaces). Then you can write an hipotetic list (by hand in a paper) of what you want. In your case the list was (0, 1, 3, 2) (2, 3, 5, 4) (4, 5, 7, 6), etc... if you can imagine building 2 lists, each one with the sequences (0, 2, 4, 6, etcc) and (1, 3, 5, 7, etc..) then you can manage with shift and graft to finally have four lists. A( 0 1 2 3 ...) B (1 3 5 etc..) C(3 5 7 etc..) D (2 4 6 etc..). And to achieve the 2 first lists, you need to get the odd and the pair numbers. The cull pattern does that amazingy well. With a pattern True-False you get de pair numbers, and with the False-True pattern you get de odd numbers.
Hope it was clear enough…
Added by Pep Tornabell at 5:32am on November 19, 2009
Writing simulation parameters...3. [2 of 8] No context surfaces...4. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...5. unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'str' and 'list'6. Failed to write Pelle_aperture000 to idf file7. unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'str' and 'list'8. Failed to write Pelle_aperture001 to idf file9. unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'str' and 'list'10. Failed to write Pelle_aperture002 to idf file11. [4 of 8] Writing Electric Load Center - Generator specifications ...12. [5 of 8] Writing materials and constructions...13. [6 of 8] Writing schedules...14. [7 of 8] Writing loads and ideal air system...15. [8 of 8] Writing outputs...16. ...... idf file is successfully written to : C:\Users\Personal\Desktop\TESI\x001\THOR\EnergyPlus\THOR.idf17. 18. Set runEnergyPlus to True!
or this
0. Current document units is in Meters1. Conversion to Meters will be applied = 1.0002. [1 of 8] Writing simulation parameters...3. [2 of 8] No context surfaces...4. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...5. Runtime error (MissingMemberException): 'hb_EPFenSurface' object has no attribute 'blindsMaterial'6. Traceback:line 1567, in main, "<string>"line 2134, in script
i think that i've same problem with my windows...any suggestion???
Thanks for all…
oning behind using the equality component to test for even numbers is flawed because of the data matching used by gh. It is testing like this:
0==0 True
2==1 False
4==2 False
6==3 False
etc
.............
Where as a Modulo 2 would work like this
0%2 = 0
1%2 = 1
2%2 = 0
3%2 = 1
4%2 = 0
5%2 = 1
6%2 = 0
7%2 = 1
8%2 = 0
9%2 = 1
......
Also I notice you have some errors in your expressions producing Nulls.
If you want it to be twice the value then you should have 2*D in the Expression and 10*D in the other
....
I attach a working version.…
ee 3)
{5}
0 15
{6}
0 16
And I want to place points at every possible combination of these coordinates, treating Tree 1 as X coordinates, Tree 2 as Y coordinates, and Tree 3 as Z coordinates. Also, I would like the list of points to be a tree with paths corresponding to the coordinates. Wouldn't it be nice if I could plug these trees into a Point XYZ, with a new "branch cross reference" method, and get the following result?
{0:3:5}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{0:3:6}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{0:4:5}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{0:4:6}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{1:3:5}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{1:3:6}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{1:4:5}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{1:4:6}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{2:3:5}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{2:3:6}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{2:4:5}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{2:4:6}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 16.0}
In this form of cross referencing, every combination of individual branches from the different lists is used as separate input, and the output for each combination is put onto a branch in the result whose path is the concatenation of the input branch paths used.…
Added by Andy Edwards at 7:03pm on November 3, 2009
zed like this:
{0}
0 Surface 1
{1}
0 Surface 2
1 Surface 3
2 Surface 4
{2}
0 Surface 5
1 Surface 6
{3}
0 Surface 7
1 Surface 8
2 Surface 9
And not like this (which is what i have when select tehm with "multiple surfaces")
{0}
0 Surface 1
1 Surface 2
.....
7 Surface 8
8 Surface 9
Thanks a lot for your help: it is a very frequent issue and i would like to fix it.
Regards
…
53 → 53 → 63 → 74 → 74 → 84 → 9
As you can see from the above list the connection sequence comes in waves of three, where each group of similar indices on the left is associated with a group of three incrementing indices on the right.
Some combination of Series components will probably generate this list, but it'll only work for the first ring, the second one will need a different connection pattern. It is perhaps better to just encode the integer pairs by hand. But then you cannot change your mind about the number of sides later.…
Added by David Rutten at 10:39am on October 21, 2015
points 0, X-1, (2*x)-1, (3*X)-1, (4*X)-1, (5*X)-1 and then
1, X, (2*x), (3*X), (4*X), (5*X)
2, X+1, (2*x)+1, (3*X)+1, (4*X)+1, (5*X)+1
and so on till
5, X+4, (2*x)+4, (3*X)+4, (4*X)+4, (5*X)+4
How can I do this best?
Thanks,
Niels…