op van maximaal 1000 iteraties
3) Offset de polyline en maak een nieuwe Brep van alle curven
4) Bepaal de Area-centroid van de Brep
5) Bepaal het verschil tussen de huidige centroid en de gezochte centroid
6) Als dit verschil minder is dan 1e-12 breken we af
7) Vermenigvuldig het verschil met vier en pas de polyline aan
8) herhaal (3 - 7)
Is dit min of meer wat je wilde? Het lijkt dat er ~50 iteraties nodig zijn voor een antwoord dat accuraat is binnen de 1e-12 eenheden.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 5:26am on August 24, 2010
)
Do you want to remove all branches in the right tree that do not appear on the left? Or is there some other problem causing this disparity?
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Seattle, WA…
Added by David Rutten at 3:20pm on November 4, 2013
ceros. Parametrización, panelización y análisis en Grasshopper, así como el proceso de manufactura digital para maquinaria de corte Láser y CNC.
UN solo pago anticipado $4,000.00
Pagos diferidos $4,500.00*
*reserva tu lugar con el 50%
Martes y Jueves de 7 a 10 PM
Del 15 de Mayo al 14 de junio
DURACION: 30 HORAS
SESIONES: 10 DE 3 HORAS
o info@dimensiontallerdigital.com
informes al 55 (50 16 0634) con Mayri Gallegos (o al cel. 55 28 85 24 73)
$4,000.00…
er. The pan/tilt servo setup is a kit from Lynx motion. I found a cheaper one of these through Trossen Robotics though so you may try to buy one there. The only other thing you need are the jumper cables and the breadboard. I hope this helps.…
y retículas aprenderás a modelar parametricamente con Rhinoceros + Grasshopper para aplicarlo a la manufactura digital en láser y/o CNC. El taller se desarrolla a lo largo de 5 clases y una presentación donde los talleristas presentarán una pieza cortada con láser o CNC.
LOS PRECIOS SON EN DOLARES. OFRECEMOS PAQUETES CON EL TALLER Y LA LICENCIA DE RHINO COMERCIAL Y EDUCACIONAL…
of the roof is getting higher results than expected (for city at north hemisphere), and higher than the south side of the (vertical) roof, (that is abnormal for the latitude).
The expected results should be like that of PVGIS:
ORIENTATION
ANGLE
PVGIS
DIVA
N
22
649
824
S
22
970
860
FLAT
0
829
867
N
43
504
525
S
43
1020
873
N
90
278
233
S
90
781
707
Can anyone guess the reason, or did anyone face this problem in the past? what do you think I should change?
Attached you may find the .gh file and the climate data file.
Thank you very much for your time.…
T) of matching index in the text list.
1) I have input lists of numbers before using the Number component and "Set[ting] mulltiple numbers...", but what tool would I use to input a list of letters?
2) Can I use Dispatch based on an arbitrary list like this?
3) I could make 6 different Cull Patterns: "if (item) = A, true, false", "if (item) = B, true, false"... but that seems so clunky and won't scale if I add new letters into my list.
How can I make a key and use it to split my list of points?
Thanks,
Richman…
1) Scale down the inputs. e.g. if you are basing your project on a grid of 50 by 50 use 10 by 10 until you have a better idea about the direction you're taking.
2) Disable the solver. If you know you have to connect up 5 new components with 10 different wire connections. Disable the solver until the task is done and then enable it again.
3) Cache geometry or Intenalise. If the first half of your definition is working how you want it to then you can use the internalise feature of a Param component to disconnect the wire and set it in memory. and disable all the prior components so they no longer need to compute. Alternatively use the original Geometry Cache component to bake it to Rhino and call it back with a referenced name.
ALSO BEWARE of any components like BakeAttributes that have an activate Boolean. Unless this is set to false, each time the solution rebuilds it will bake its geometry to Rhino. I have been in the situation many times where I have an huge amount of objects in rhino, to the point that I have to force Rhino to close in order to get bake to using my computer. Make sure you set it to True and then back to false straight away.…
ll to one end of the field.
Here's another, slightly more involved way to approach it:
1. create an even, random field of points
2. sort them in the direction of the gradient (decompose the points into xyz and sort by z value, for instance)
3. plug the sorted points into the jitter component and use a slider to control the amount of jitter
4. use "split list" to extract one half of the list (use list length/2 as the index)
5. adjust the jitter amount - at 0 you'll get a solid block of the top half of the random points, at 1 you'll get a random set of 50% of the points, but somewhere in between you'll get the appearance of a gradient.
Let me know if any of this is unclear... hope this gets you started.
Andrew…