enerated surface frames but strangely it makes twice the amount of required surfaces;;
i am uploading the rhino file and the ghx definition.
instead of making "57" surfaces it makes 2X57....
1.......57 & then 57,57,57,........57 (57 )times…
onsecutive points at the same height then your 'Break at discontinuities' component eliminates the middle point completely and then the 'Interpolate Curve' component gives a much bigger bump in the wrong direction. This was enough to get curves to meet from opposite sides.
I fixed this by changing the heights to 1.1 or 2.9, rather than 1.0 and 3.0, but it took a little while to work it out! Sigh.
I attach a new version. But I actually preferred it as it was before. See what you think!
Bob
p.s. in the first list, elements 11, 12, 23 and 24 go from 1 to 3; elements 17 and 18 go from 3 to 1. In the second list, elements 6, 17, 18 and 29 go from 1 to 3; elements 12 and 23 go from 3 to 1. Given the above fix, these can be easily seen.…
Added by Bob Mackay at 10:40pm on November 24, 2015
0, 5, 10, 15, 20
1, 6, 11, 16, 21
2, 7, 12, 17, 22
3, 8, 13, 18, 23
4, 9, 14, 19, 24
and if i'm here is because i'm not able... :)
can you help me?
thank you
…
dont get you, i am saying sleect numbers in range 1 to 10, starting from 1 with a step of 2.
1 to 10 by 3 = 1 4 7 10
1 to 10 by 5 = 1 6
1 to 10 by 1 = 1 to 10 = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Added by Steve Lewis at 3:15pm on November 11, 2013