definition in which I used to generate.
The issue is that the values continue to stay 0 and I can't figure out what I'm missing.
Is it the epw file that is the issue?
Looking forward to hearing back from you guys.
Thanks again.
In "radiation study2" image, there is an error (possibly this is the cause?) :
{0;0}0. KeyError(1,)1. KeyError(1,)2. KeyError(1,)3. KeyError(1,)4. KeyError(1,)5. KeyError(1,)6. KeyError(1,)7. KeyError(1,)8. KeyError(1,)9. KeyError(1,)......
w…
Curve
6 Poly Curve
7 Poly Curve ... etc
I need to loft half of them as a pattern like 2 by 2... ex:
0 with 1 ---> loft
1 with 2 ---> no loft
2 with 3 ---> loft
3 with 4 ---> loft
4 w.... etc.
In my case (as you can see in the screenshot) i've two list in whic i've to apply this process.
I can't use list items because the numbers of items may change, and if i get a grafted list of items i can't loft the curves, but if i get the flattened pattern of data the loft component loft everything without considering the sequence.
I guess i've been clear to explain my data structure problem!
Pls! I'm waiting for some help!!! Thx a lot in advance,
Marco …
Added by Marco Caprani at 9:20am on February 12, 2012
1 - 3D Urban Visibility Analysis with Vector GIS Data. In GISRUK, University of Portsmouth, UK.
SULEIMAN W., JOLIVEAU T. & FAVIER E., 2012 - Reconnaissance de bâtiments et localisation de photographies au moyen d’un descripteur de texture. In Revue Internationale de Géomatique.
SULEIMAN W., JOLIVEAU T. & FAVIER E., 2012 - A New Algorithm for 3D Isovist. In 15th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling Geospatial dynamics, geosimulation and exploratory visualization, 22-24th August 2012 in Bonn, Germany.
SULEIMAN W., JOLIVEAU T. & FAVIER E., 2012 - A New Algorithm for 3D Isovist. In 3U3D2012: USAGE, USABILITY, AND UTILITY OF 3D CITY MODELS, 29th to 31st October 2012, Nantes, France.
SULEIMAN W., JOLIVEAU T. & FAVIER E., 2012 - Une nouvelle méthode de calcul d’isovist en 2 et 3 dimensions. Sageo 2012 , 6-9 novembre 2012, Université de Liège , Belgique.…
Thank you Marios,
but I want to put boxes on all the plane: if I divide U domain in 4 parts and V domain in 3 parts I'll have 12 boxes with 12 different heights in W
How can be done?
regards
Maurizio
home PC and it worked without any issues.
Do you have Administrator privileges on your PC?
Is it possible that you do this:1) Set all _runIt inputs in your tuc_terrain.gh file to False.2) Save an close the tuc_terrain.gh file.3) Delete your "c:/gismo" folder4) Open again your tuc_terrain.gh file in Grasshopper.5) Run the "OSM shapes" component by setting its _runIt input to True.6) If you again get the "Invalid shapes" warning, then set the _runIt input of the "OSM shapes" component to False.7) Wait at least a couple of seconds (let' say 6 or 7 seconds)!8) Set the _runIt input of the "OSM shapes" component to True again.
What happens then?…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 1:45am on August 3, 2017
B1-4343-4035-989E-044E8580D9CF}\0.9.56.0\karamba\License
I still get this error:
1. Could not read public key from 'C:\Documents and Settings\"mynamehere"\Application Data\McNeel\Rhinoceros\5.0\Plug-ins\Grasshopper {B45A29B1-4343-4035-989E-044E8580D9CF}\0.9.56.0\karamba\License\public.key'
Im running rhino 5 32 bit w gh 9.0056
I uninstalled Karamba and re installed the latest and greatest version but same result... Tried to troubleshoot it on my own but no luck. sorry to bother you. sure its a simple solution. thanks-e…
Added by Ethan to Karamba3D at 7:01pm on February 6, 2014
t] com
they sell custom machines for gamers and the computers have real good parts + you can customize it the way you want (hardware wise)
I checked and you can build yourself a laptop w/ same specs as you are referring to for around 1600 USD (assuming you are talk about 15")
I'd also recommend not to overpay for a videocard - really depending on what you will be doing it might be unnecessary to pay lots since it is the most expensive part of the laptop. I have been doing GH for some time and I haven't had much trouble w/ 512 mb nvidia (unless the geometry goes astray - in which case it would be heavy for any existing card to keep up with)…
With this in mind:
1. Create the mesh and the face normals and the desired W pts - where W = the "top" pts (you did it already). Get nodeToNode connectivity data.
2. Extract W pts connectivity data (by doing a tmp mess using the W pts). Connectivity data are trees where - in this: nodeToNode case - a given branch main dimension index is the node index (within a given nodes List) and the items are the indices of the neighbor nodes (within the very same nodes List).
3. Connect the W pts using data from steps 1/2 as above. …