where each branch contains all the points generated by dividing each curve, so if you divide into 10 segments, you'll get:
{0;0}(N = 11)
{0;1}(N = 11)
{0;2}(N = 11)
{0;3}(N = 11)
{0;4}(N = 11)
Where the second integer in the curly brackets refers back to the index of the curve in the original list.
Another way to look at this data is to see it as a table. It's got 5 rows (one for each original curve) and 11 columns, where every column contains a specific division point.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
dont get you, i am saying sleect numbers in range 1 to 10, starting from 1 with a step of 2.
1 to 10 by 3 = 1 4 7 10
1 to 10 by 5 = 1 6
1 to 10 by 1 = 1 to 10 = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Added by Steve Lewis at 3:15pm on November 11, 2013
r surfaces by EP results' components.
Having set a period from 9:00 to 19:00 for a single day (10th december), and using a slider from 0 to 10 (11 values, 0 is 9:00), the following mismatch occurs:
setting value 0 works for surface temperature but not for mean radiant temperature (warning says "stepofSimulation is outside the bounds of the comfResultMTX", but I do have 11 values from radiant temp matrix).
setting value 1 is rendered as "hour 2 of simulation" for surface temperature (FIG 1) and as "9:00" of radiant temperature (FIG 2).
It seems there is a slide of 1 hour. How should I interpret this?
Kind regards,
artemátyika…
Added by artemátyika at 3:34pm on February 2, 2019
rve
10 curve
11 curve
12 curve
13 curve
...and I'd like to rearrange the order in which the curve are listed, to something like this:
{0,0,0}
0 curve
1 curve
8 curve
9 curve
10 curve
11 curve
2 curve
3 curve
4 curve
5 curve
12 curve
13 curve
6 curve
7 curve
I hope this makes sense.
Thank in advance for any advice,
John…
ee 3)
{5}
0 15
{6}
0 16
And I want to place points at every possible combination of these coordinates, treating Tree 1 as X coordinates, Tree 2 as Y coordinates, and Tree 3 as Z coordinates. Also, I would like the list of points to be a tree with paths corresponding to the coordinates. Wouldn't it be nice if I could plug these trees into a Point XYZ, with a new "branch cross reference" method, and get the following result?
{0:3:5}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{0:3:6}
0 {10.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{0:4:5}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{0:4:6}
0 {10.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{1:3:5}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{1:3:6}
0 {11.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{1:4:5}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{1:4:6}
0 {11.0, 14.0, 16.0}
{2:3:5}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 15.0}
{2:3:6}
0 {12.0, 13.0, 16.0}
{2:4:5}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 15.0}
{2:4:6}
0 {12.0, 14.0, 16.0}
In this form of cross referencing, every combination of individual branches from the different lists is used as separate input, and the output for each combination is put onto a branch in the result whose path is the concatenation of the input branch paths used.…
Added by Andy Edwards at 7:03pm on November 3, 2009
13 5 15 6 17 7 ... …
But it seems I have not been clear:
the input values (3,5,7,9,11,13) should be presented in the way of "number slider" parameter. So by increasing the value of the slider from minimum 3, to 5, 7, 9, 13, 15, 17... I should get an output numbers of 0,1,3,4,5,6,7...
So I if choose value 3 on the input "number slider", on the other end, I want 0 as an output.
Or if I choose value 5 on the input "number slider", I want 1 as an output, and so on.
Is this possible?…