o type in the values less than -1 x 10^-6 in "Floating point value", can be bypassed by multiplying this value with another -1 x 10^-6. That way I will get -1 x 10^-12, right? And so on, and so on?
What is the minimum "Floating point value" Panel (String) can take?
Thank you.…
1#comments
But I seem to be having a problem with this closest to some value thing: values in my list are too small, up too 1 x 10^-30. The closest value I want to search for in that list is 1.25 x 10^-9
But Grasshoppers "find similar" component recognizes all of the values from the list, to be similar to 1.25 x 10^-9, because all of those values are in range from 0.1 to 1 x 10^-30.
Is there a way some kind of tolerance can be made, when it comes to recognizing a similar value?…
the paths.
Structure one (paths = 2)
{1;0;0;0;0}(N=10)
{2;0;0;0;0}(N=10)
Structure two (paths = 2)
{1;0;0;0}(N=10)
{2;0;0;0}(N=10)
If i merge the two lists i don't get a structure with 2 paths:
Structure result af merging (2 paths)
{1}(N=20)
{2}(N=20)
as i had expected, but instead a structure with 4 paths because of the difference in amount of zeroes:
Structure result af merging (4 paths)
{1;0;0;0;0}(N=10)
{2;0;0;0;0}(N=10)
{1;0;0;0}(N=10)
{2;0;0;0}(N=10)
The amount of zeroes changes all the time when working on the definition, so what im asking is if there some way to adress paths with * number of zeroes behind.…
rated by "<" symbols. Examples: "2<10", "2<4<10", "Pow(2, 1)<5*Sin(3)<10".
The entered text contains 2 or 3 segments separated by two or more consecutive dots. Examples "2..10", "2..4..10", "Pow(2, 1)....5*Sin(3)..10".
If only two segments are provided, then the initial value will be the same as the minimum value. If a bounds number or a default value is written as a simple number, then the number of decimal places will be harvested. I.e. "2..4..10" is not the same as "2..4..10.00" as the former will result in an integer slider and the latter in a slider with two decimal places.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 10:08am on February 15, 2013
(10^(-62)≤n) and (n>10^(-14))
Shouldn't this become :
10^(-4)≤n
(10^(-9)≤n) and (n<10^(-4))
(10^(-14)≤n) and (n<10^(-9))
(10^(-62)≤n) and (n<10^(-14))
…