ng Grasshopper (Rhino. Plugin) by the end of the workshopStudent performance objectivesSchedule :Deadline for Registration : July 14,2016After Submitting your registration form, you will be contacted for confirmation.Workshop Starts : July 17, 2016The workshop consists of 10 lectures, Each lecture lasts for 3 hours.3 lectures per week (Sun,Tue &Thu) Fees : 900 L.EYou have to fill this registration form below if you want to attend the workshop. We only have few places available. Prerequisite:-Basic knowledge of any 3d modeling software “Sketchup, 3dsmax, Rhino, Maya, ...,etc.” is required to attend the workshop.- Student must bring their own laptops.Students output during previous workshops :https://www.facebook.com/GIZMOSTUDIO.AS/photos/?tab=album&album_id=548388031851299instructor: Hassan ragab https://www.behance.net/hassanragab…
rection: there's no visible demand. Explanation: a lot of AEC oriented people (Smart Geo daydreamers) they think - potentially - about GH but they are rejecting it for more than obvious reasons: our job is 1% about the smart thing and 99% about the structured aspect of the smart (or stupid thing).
Back to that "hangar" : The primary role of this GH definition provided herein (and hopefully some future updates) is NOT to outline some academic solution (via some abstract collection of pipes/lines/points/surfaces) ...but to place in 3d space - properly structured - all the real-life (hmm, he he) bits that can compose the actual project. Of course if the bits could be parametrically driven assemblies ...well...you get the gist of the message.
All in all: I think that Engineers who are GH skeptics could see GH with a totally new perspective if, say, a collection of similar examples/test cases could be available for demo/evaluation/whatever > Ah! at last : this appears to be a real thing > what software did it? > say it again - Grass Components you said? > what sort of name is this? ... etc etc etc.
But since a similar development is quite expensive (and requires a team of several gurus), maybe this is rather a future potential task for the GH/Rhino people if they think that the AEC market segment could be beneficial for their products. Combine a similar capability with tools like yours and/or Evolute (planar quads are "a-la-mode" these days).
PS: forget trivial stuff > what about Stefanie? (plan B : better something than nothing)…
things I need to keep in mind are that, 1) I'm the only tool guy on this project, and 2) I need to generate results in my application domain - and Rhino, Grasshopper and my own code are tools, not results. If I spend all my time developing tools (or learning how to develop tools) then we're never going to get across the finish line. I can perhaps take a longer view on my tool investment once I have the "core" functionality in place. But I'm not there yet.
I've mapped out the various algorithms I would use for each task of the toolset I'm developing. For example merging surfaces was supposed to simply involve intersection/split/cull/join. That intersection operations don't always return complete, accurate and usable results throws my plans into the air. Data flow programming of genetic algorithms fits my background of 30 years programming and 5 years of 3D design. Diving more deeply into the underlying math of B-rep geometry is a rabbit hole I didn't budget falling into.
You bring up other architectures like solid modeling and features. R/GH are just 2 of many, many tools I've looked at to achieve my goals. No single tool or ecosystem looks complete enough to meet all my needs. My prior stop on my quest was OnShape. I found much to appreciate there, but it's still VERY early in their development. (I personally think they are a decade away from having a solution worth investing in.) R/GH seems fairly mature, but I'm already hitting walls like this. There are always struggles and never an ideal solution.
Thanks for your insights,
- Bob…
Added by neobobkrause at 7:32am on September 2, 2016
component in GH for a project im working on. as part of that component I want to dynamic show text the rhino viewport but I don't want to have to return a value that I then plug into the "text tag 3d" component. I want to build a similar method into my custom component.
therein lies my problem. I haven't yet figured out how to get my vb code to produce text.
my latest attempt looks a little something like this.
Dim TestPoint3D As New rhino.Geometry.Point3d(0, 0, 0) Dim TestVect As New rhino.Geometry.Vector3d(0, 0, 1) Dim TestPlane As New plane(TestPoint3D, TestVect) Dim TestText As New display.text3d("bob", TestPlane, 10) ListItem = TestPlane TextItem = TestText
but I get nothing out of it.
latest theory is to try using "Draw3dText Method (Text3d, Color)" but this is where ive hit a wall
if I understand how this works than I would think I would code this
Dim TestText As New Rhino.Display.DisplayPipline.Draw3dText( text here, and color here)
but the hint that im getting after "DisplayPipline" doesnt show a "Draw3dText" method?
so im confused?
again my overall goal is to get text to display in the viewport directly through my component
any thoughts or ideas, or if im even in the ballpark on this one would be helpful.
thanks!…
) In the Rhino view port it is not possible to modify it until is backed (and I don't want!) I need to place several images each one in a different place.
2) Is it possible to use another component THAT DO NOT CONVERT INTO BLACK AND WHITE, the pictures??. I need to set COLOR images in a 3D model, using grasshopper. thanks!
Any comment or suggestion would be welcome!!!
Thanks a lot!
…
p across to Kangaroo 2, but I am still trying to wrap my head around it. I understand that it allows you to incorporate multiple forces dependent on one another a bit better, which is what my question pertains to...
We are currently developing a project around creating a tensile lattice structure within an inflatable. In mocking things up, I have been able to simply inflate forms with static anchor points. I was wondering if it would be possible to link the anchor points for the inflatable shell to tensioned cables or nets pulling on the interior that find equilibrium when the tension is changed?
Below are some illustrations of what I am trying to achieve that I did with a tetrahedron in Kangaroo 1. To get both the inflated form and the tensioned form I had to run two simulations and bake each. I am looking for a way to have to forces of both dependent on one another.
I'm isolating the interior tension member to cables for now, but I would eventually like to expand to suspending 3d netted volumes within the inflatable.
I have also attached my attempted gh file with Kangaroo 2. It kind of works but not as drastically as I would like, and it breaks down very easily. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated!:)
…
Singapore
DESCRIPTION : Two seemingly contrasting ideas combined will turn into something remarkably new. This resulted in the idea of Digital Craftsmanship – connecting the digital technology with artisans’ craftsmanship. Singapore is uniquely positioned to benefit from both – the latest technology in digital fabrication, as well as the beautiful and rich culture of ASEAN craftsmanship in countries like Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. The NUS digital fabrication in architecture studio introduces advanced design to fabrication flow, such as 3D modeling, simulation, digital fabrication and physical assembly and testing. We discover existence of data flow distinguishes digital and conventional craftsmanship, prolonging the interface between human and object. The result is very encouraging –the Digital Craftsmanship approach could lead innovative yet regionally relevant contemporary architectural design, complex yet controlled functional geometry and aesthetics. We hope this exhibition could raise our awareness about preserving the precious wisdom of traditional craftsmanship alongside with advanced fabrication technologies in architecture.
OPENING : 24 August 2012, 7pm – 9pm, RSVP to Yi Hui (dfabstudio@gmail.com) EXHIBITION : 25 – 28 August 2012 (10 am – 9 pm, daily, free admission) VENUE : Promenade, Level 8, National Library Building, 100 Victoria Street, Singapore
PROJECT TEAM : Shinya Okuda (Studio Tutor), Liane Ee Rulian, Hiral Ashvin Desai, Lee Teng Teng Cheryl, Ian Wong Hengjie, Teo Lin Lin, Xu Xiaoqi, Liu Zhichao, Diptarshi Dev, Tan Zi Hua, Teh Yi Hui, Joshua Loh.
Organized by Digital Fabrication in Architecture Studio, NUS.…
noceros 3D, en caso de aprobar satisfactoriamente el examen, se les otorga un reconocimiento avalado por el CMJ y la Secretaría del Trabajo. Este workshop va dirigido principalmente a estudiantes de arquitectura; sin embargo, ya que la parametrización es una herramienta que abarca diferentes ámbitos del diseño, se pueden integrar estudiantes de diseño industrial, artistas o estudiantes que tengan relación con lo gráfico y lo formal. Al finalizar el curso, los asistentes serán capaces de manejar Rhinoceros y Grasshopper en un nivel medio, con el objetivo de que el alumno pueda continuar aprendiendo con alguno de nuestros workshops subsiguientes o de manera autodidacta.
Las personas inscritas deben tener conocimientos básicos de geometría y de preferencia utilizar algún programa de dibujo en 2D o modelación en 3d. Rhino.GetMe Rigid // Enfocado a construir un objeto de diseño parametrizado a cualquier escala, el workshop se divide en tres módulos: Módulo 1 // Rhinoceros 3D // Una sesión de cinco horas. Módulo 2 //Grasshopper // Una sesión de cinco horas. Módulo 3 // Ejercicios prácticos /Tres sesiones de diez horas c/u. Es necesario traer el equipo necesario para trabajar, se cuenta con equipos en caso de que algún alumno no cuente con laptop pero son limitados, por favor avísanos a la brevedad si lo requieres. Se les recomienda que traigan dispositivos de almacenamiento en caso de que necesitemos compartir información.
El costo del Workshop es de $6500.00 para profesionales y $5000 pesos para estudiantes.
Pre-venta únicamente para estudiantes, hasta el día viernes 29 de junio, con un costo de $3500.00 pesos.
El cupo del evento es limitado puedes apartar tu lugar y terminar de liquidar antes del 29 de junio en pre-venta, antes del 6 de junio en admisión general.
Para hacer tu registro al workshop por favor envía un correo a workshop@transformalab.com incluyendo:
Nombre
Universidad u oficina de procedencia
Teléfono móvil
En el caso de estudiantes por favor incluyan una copia escaneada de su Constancia de Estudios para hacer válido su descuento.
Una vez recibida su información se les enviará un correo con la información necesaria para realizar su pago mediante depósito bancario, y posteriormente un mail de confirmación de su participación en el Workshop.
www.transformalab.com…
ke triangle faces like they are in the 2D case of mostly hexagons/pentagons being the dual of a triangular mesh. What you are seeing is in fact fragments of the original non-flat mesh surface.
Perhaps I could isolate the mostly hexagons themselves and create alternative cells with patches for faces to handle non-flat faces. See, if you look very close at the literature figures, they simply leave out the lines in their actual surface faces that themselves have multiple mesh faces, whereas I'm outputting NURBS so end up with polysurface faces when I make a formal clipped Voronoi.
In the 2D case, flattening the cell edges is equivalent to flattening the 3D faces, but that's rarely what people want to do in the 2D case so they just chop the boundary up into curved little cell edges:
It was going to be difficult to clip the 3D case at all without grabbing a small hexagonal/pentagonal piece of the original mesh but once I have done that, I can then possibly replace it with a single surface often non-flat patch, as an option instead. If I tried to make them all flat it would require altering the geometry at least in places, likely most places. See the figure on the right. The faces are not flat!
The question is whether the Rhino Patch command will reliably close the cell with a mere patch on there instead of a faceted polysurface.
I'll look into this. One option is to include the center point in the patch forming command, to not flatten the face so much.
Doing Patch in Rhino, manually, I'm *not* getting a closable solid easily:
Any ideas? I can increase the spans of the patch I guess, without a huge memory hit since it's just surface pieces. Even with 10 spans and stiffness only 1 it still won't close though. Ah, it's because it has sharp facets from the clipping itself and a patch will simply not form a sharp kink in the face of a single surface so will never close?! 30 spans is already getting up there and it won't close either:
Not even if I include a mesh version of the polysurface face in my Patch command will it close the solid, even with low stiffness, since it simply will not make a proper kink in the the edge. It can't really, since a patch is a single surface and it would require huge numbers of UV control points to get within closing tolerance.
I'm kind of stumped. I've included a file if you want to show me how to patch that surface.
Loft to a point from the border curve to the vertex just gives back a more complicated polysurface:
…
tors: R.G.D.E tutors Mostafa R. A. Khalifa, Architect (PhD - UNICAM - Italy)
Assistants: Nagham Baitawy - Architect - Jordan
Ahmed Hassan - Architect & TA - Egypt
deadline registration August, 25th , 2013
http://grasshopperworkshopamman.blogspot.com/ introduction: This workshop will introduce basic and advanced notions of Grasshopper and the methodology of parametric design and algorithmic modeling and its usage in Architecture, design, landscape, and urban scale. It is intended for professionals and students with a minimum experience in 3D Modeling.
…