a specific domain, for example:
0.) 0 to 1 -----> 11 random values from 0 to 1 (0.245,0.678,0.36,0.78,.28,0.18........)
1.) 1 to 2 -----> 11 random values from 1 to 2 (1.26,1.36,1.01,1.68,1.26,1.96.........)
3.) 2 to 3 -----> 11 random values from 2 to 3 (2.96,2.45,2.78,2.56,2.98,2.10..........)
4.) 3 to 4 and so on where I have a data set containing 11 paths with 11 values and the values fall within the specific domain.
Like my post above I have the correct path but I need to feed it the correct seed to get different values for each number. I tried grafting a series similar to the last post but it scrambles my data. Thanks so much for the help!
…
0, 5, 10, 15, 20
1, 6, 11, 16, 21
2, 7, 12, 17, 22
3, 8, 13, 18, 23
4, 9, 14, 19, 24
and if i'm here is because i'm not able... :)
can you help me?
thank you
…
e range of materials, including heavy-duty fabrics. They offer a range of embroidery machines that cater to different needs and budgets.best embroidery machine for custom designs…
Thanks Mateusz. slTopoSphere reduced the number of naked edges from 131 to 1 (26 closed loops, 1 open). Not bad out of a total of 32521 (before subdividing).
David's past 2 to the 12
then me 2 to the 11 ( I need a life)
I'd say you're a shoo-in for 3rd with 2 to the 10
After that it gets a bit hazy, probably Luis then Giulio. But who's counting :)
The R Domain of the seed generation does not have to be restricted to either 0 to 1 (default) or 0 to 26 (your modification) try it as 0 to 1000 see what you get
which doesn't exist in the actual problem spec. If galapagos is allowed to change the column position in all possible directions, it is less likely to get stuck in some local optimum.
Let's assume that (all other things being equal) column 20 would yield the best possible answer. The current state of the system though is at column 26, which is pretty good too, just not as good. Galapagos is more likely to 'mutate' the state a little bit instead of a lot, so it'll explore the columns near 26. However 20 isn't near 26 at all, only 25 and 27 are nearby, and maybe 24 and 28. But they'll all worse answers, so after sampling in those directions GP will abandon that as fruitless.
If however you specify the columns using two variables, then the columns near 26 are 20, 25, 27 and 32. That's a far richer space to explore which much better approximates the real problem.…
le.
The 'Move' component at the end of your code is generating 676 (26 X 26) copies of the curve you want to rotate - not good! You can avoid that by flattening the 'Len' output and the 'Move G' input:
But those surfaces are not "solid" (Closed Breps) - what do you want there?
SIMPLIFY! Make just one of these surfaces of revolution at the center of your big circle, then move 26 copies of it radially.…
Added by Joseph Oster at 12:36pm on January 12, 2017