9 8 7 6
5 4 3 2 1 0
I am triangulating this surface. I want to select just the red vertices. As you can note, I just need the inner vertices of this surface. I could do it mannually, but if I want to change the mesh density later, I will have to pick all of them manually again later.
Can someone help me?
Tks
…
5 8, and then the following values are obtain as the last one (8) plus 3, then this last one (11) plus 5, and then this last one (16) plus 8, and then it starts again: 24+3, 27+5, 32+8...
Thanks
…
Added by Jesus Galvez at 5:17am on November 27, 2012
pen Brep"; I didn't know it worked on flat surfaces. And I think it's only fair to include in your benchmark the considerable time 'SUnion' takes in this example: 21.9 seconds for 121 rings and likely much more with 400 or 1,000+ rings.
Then I noticed the pattern doesn't match. Checked the circles and they are the same. The distance between them, however, is different: 7 instead of 6. When I change that value to 6, the Python fails badly. All the holes and gaps are gone, which destroys the pattern:
I can't do the "two phase" approach on an 11 X 11 grid, but I can do 6 X 6 and 2 X 2 to get a 12 X 12 grid (40 'SUnion' operations) in 28 seconds total. That beats your benchmark of ~37 seconds for an 11 X 11 grid, if you include the 'SUnion' in your code.
…
om frame -5 till frame -10 a frame spacing of 100mm is used,
etc.
Frame 0 is located on X=0 mm
Frame -5 will be on X=-500 mm
Frame -6 will be on X=(X of frame -5) -25 = -525 mm
Frame -11 wil be on X= ((X of frame -10) -10 = ?? mm
etc.
Cheers,
Bas…
output will show a tree with 3 branches of 4 integers each that I can pass on to other components. What is the best way to do it?
I have tried creating a tree and using a for loop to do so, but it didn't work.
Thank you for your help.
…
7, 9, 12 and 13 to be able to rotate freely around the y axis at nodes 2, 3, 6, 7, 10 and 11 respectively. The last 2 conditions, for elements 12 and 13, doesn't give any problems, but the first 4 does.
Any help?
…