exploran los principios básicos de Grasshopper en Rhino 5 para desarrollar algoritmos de superficies responsivas a datos generados por dispositivos y aplicaciones como: iPhone/iPad/iPod, Android, GPS, Kinect, etc.
Es necesario traer tu Laptop con Rhino y Grasshopper instalados.
Rhino: http://download.rhino3d.com/rhino/4.0/ev aluation/download/
Grasshopper: http://download.rhino3d.com/Grasshopper/ 1.0/wip/download/
Cupo Limitado
info@dimensiontallerdigital.com
$4,000.00…
question. Why are you using Win 8 or Win 10, instead of staying with Win7 ?The 102 page long EULA from Microsoft asks you to accept, prior to the install, should give any thinking person pause, and to think carefully before he or she is accepts the consequences of installing Win 8 or Win 10.No IT profession would allow any company to install Windows 8 or 10 on their companies computer networks. Imagine for a moment your Doctor installed Windows 10, and now all his daily clients details are shared with Microsoft. Or imagine for a moment your Lawyer installed Windows 10, and now all his daily clients details are shared with Microsoft.Win 8 or 10 is an open apps shared OS that lacks any sense of network security.... stay with Win 7!…
n fact) according a vast variety of "modes" PLUS the required clash detection (ALWAYS via trigonometry). In plain English: outline any collection of Breps and "apply" a truss that is topologically sound (planarization in case of quads etc is an added constrain). PLUS outline/solve what comes "next" after that truss (like the planar glazing "add-on" brackets of yours [ the ones that need redesign, he he], or some roofing/facade skin system [secondary supports, corrugated sheet metal, insulation, final cladding, dogs and cats])
2. Imaging doing this in real life (nothing to do with "abstract" formations of "lines" or "shapes" or whatever). This means primarily adopting a BIM umbrella: in plain English AECOSim, Revit or Allplan (I'm a Bentley man so I use AECOSim + Generative Components). This also means using "in-parallel" a top MCAD app for 1:1 details, FEA/FIM and the vast paraphernalia required for real-life studies destined for real-life projects (made with real-life money by real-life people). My choice: CATIA/Siemens NX.
3. What to send to Microstation (if not using Generative Components, that is) and/or CATIA? In what "state"? To do what exactly? For instance even if you could design this feature driven tensile membrane anchor custom node in Rhino (you can't) it could be 100% useless in CATIA:
4. Imaging masterminding ways to send them nested instance definitions of ... er ... a coordinate system (all what you need). In plain English: since is utterly pointless to send them nested blocks that can't been parametrically controlled (variations/modifications/PLM management/BOM/specs etc etc)... send them simply the "instructions" to place coordinate systems of components that ARE parametrically designed within Microstation and/or CATIA (classic feature driven design approach blah blah). So GH solves topology et all (working on data imported via, say, Excel sheets related with sizes of components etc etc) and sends to Microstation simply this (a myriad of "this" actually):
I do hope that the gist of the "method" (the ONLY way to invite GH to the party) is clear.
best, Peter…
r this or that etc etc).
3. I would strongly advise to use some decent feature/dimension driven CAD app in order to create families of concrete deck/beam(s) profiles "manually" (the good old way PLUS recording history and using parameters for the steps taken). Find a friend who knows, say, AECOSim and ask for a small demo on that matter (specifically ask what DDD is [Dimension Driven Design]). Then you can have these in Rhino/GH, define some topology, do the "solid" and if 1M of decks/beams are required rather use instance definitions and plane to plane transformations (that's what the Orient component does) instead of creating 1M clone objects.…
In the mean time get this that does hollow Breps (shell solids in classic solid modelling CAD apps) using a highly unusual (and not recommended at all) Method - see inside C#. Of course Rhino takes ages to do it ... but that's rather expected (Rhino is a surface modeller). Doing this in many Breps ... well ... I wish you good luck.
NOTE: Obviously the right/proper way to do it is NOT using scale: Instead > get the BrepFaces offset them (inwards ) then use the Brep.CreateSolid (breps)[0] Method ... then ... blah, blah ... but the gist of the approach is rather clear (I do hope).
best, Lord of Darkness…
dings,roads and 600meters radius for the terrain:
Which corresponds to what openstreetmap is offering if you search for your location:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=33.585289%2C%2051.588740#map=17/33.58750/51.59100
Google Earth is a commercial product, and it can have better data than openstreetmap and opentopography. There are people who are payed to create map content at Google Earth, while openstreetmap relies itself on volunteer work.You can also contribute to openstreetmap - you can draw outlines of each building in Abyaneh village, and assign a number of floors to those outlines - this is a simplified way on how to add height information to openstreetmap buildings. I did this for example for my hometown. Once you do this - this data will be recorded and anyone else using either openstreetmap or Gismo will be able to benefit from it.Here is tutorial on how to add number of levels information:https://github.com/stgeorges/gismo/blob/master/resources/tutorials/How%20to%20tag%20OSM%20geometry.pdfThere is no tutorial on how to draw building outlines, but in the upper tutorial you will see a "Line" button starting from step number 4. It really is that simple, just draw four lines to make one building outline.If you are not interested in mapping the Abyaneh village building outlines, then you would have to use some other plugin, like GHowl. It can import Google Earth meshes.…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 10:54am on January 26, 2022
first appeared in software like maya I believe where there are options for the translations (move, scale, rotate) called discrete move, discrete scale, and discrete rotate. This meaning you can only move, scale, or rotate them by specified interval values.
"Are there non discrete vectors and polylines" A single vector is of course discrete. The discrete we refer to in the image above is about discretisation across the collection of vectors forming a polyline. A polyline is discrete after it is made. This discrete is about the process of making that polyline. Telling the polyline to be "x" amount of angles only in advance.
Vectors and lines are already discrete in segments when compared to curves yes, but not in angle as there is an infinite possible number of angles in a world axis (continuous). There is no control over how many angles. A curve might subdivide into 100 angles when converting into a polyline in which case it may not be as useful for the construction of some joints or bends, say you wanted only 1 joint type then you would force the polyline to only have 30 degree angels with discrete vectors (of course this wont follow the curve as close but will be more optimized from a fabrication or bending standpoint) Consider these as more discrete - discrete lines (discrete in segmentation and angle). Rather than a polyline having infinite possible angles to represent a curve - these can have a pre-determined amount of angles - in the case of this image it looks like there are only 14 possible directions the line can move. As for the fillet, that is just after the fact - the important thing is how the original lines were generated.
Think of it a bit like AutoCad's Tracking settings that lock you into drawing at specific angles.
Anyway check out the plug-in here and I am sure you will understand as soon as you open the example files: http://www.food4rhino.com/app/discrete-vectors…
ll geometry.
The difference with programs like Inventor is that they are made for production, regardless of the fabrication method. I won't go into detail about that, and instead focus on the modeling process.
In this little model, the starting point actually is a bit obvious, the foundation.
The only contents in the 3dm file are 27 lines. These indicate the location of each footing, and the direction of the tilt of each column. Everything else is defined in GH with the use of numbers as input parameters.
Needless to say, instead of those lines you could obviously generate lines and control the number of columns and panels, hence establish their layout, with any algorithmic or non-algorithmic criteria you please. That marks a major difference between GH and Inventor.
You can generate geometry with Inventor via scripting/customization (beyond iLogic), with transient graphics for visual feedback similar to GH's red-default previews. However Inventor's modeling functions are not set to input and output data trees. I won't go into detail on that, but suffice to say that the data tree associativity of GH was for me the first major difference I noticed. I've used other apps with node diagram interfaces like digital fusion for non-linear video editing since the late 90's, so the canvas did not call my attention when I first started using GH.
Anyways, here's a screen capture of the foundational lines:
In the first group of components, the centerlines of the rear columns are modeled:
And the locations in elevation for connection points are set. Those elevations were just numbers I copied from Excel, but you can obviously control that any way you please. I was just trying to model this quickly.
The same was done for the rear columns:
The above, believe it or not, took me the first 5 hours to get.
Here's a screen capture of what the model and definition looked like after 4 hours, not much:
If you're interested, next post I can get into the sketching part you mentioned, which is a bit cumbersome with GH, but not really.
I wouldn't say that using GH to do this little model was cumbersome, it just needed some thinking at the beginning. You do similar initial thinking when working with a feature-based modeler.…
Added by Santiago Diaz at 12:44am on February 24, 2011
if you can't resolve the details ... well ... they do that as well. For Europe contact my good friend Peter Stevens. (BirdAir).
In general: PRIOR designing ANYTHING (at all) you must formulate some kind of collaboration with a specialized manufacturer. Problem is that ... er ... if they don't know you they don't give much attention (this is a rather "closed" AEC sector).
On the other hand if your membrane is bespoke designing the components (anchor plates, masts, tensioners etc etc) and/or using bespoke ones available in the market (not many around. mind)... well ... this IS the core of the matter. Rhino is NOT suitable for that kind of stuff by any means.
Kangaroo 1/2 is the way to go when inside GH. Other apps especially the "pro" ones are very expensive. BirdAir has the best software for that matter but is mostly an internal product available as well only for few "strategic" partners as they call Architects who can design that kind of stuff.
Other than that have some fun:
Tensile Membranes test3 - Grasshopper
And this ... well ...is about NOT doing it:
Need help about using Kangaroo for form finding
…