st = Pbr.Faces Dim bf As brepface = bfl(0) Dim bs As brep = bf.Split(intcrvV, 0.1) Dim bsF As rhino.Geometry.Collections.BrepFaceList = bs.Faces
but now the issue is that though it technically splits the brepface, it is not in 2 seperate faces. It remains as one "surface" with a cut line at my split curve. Is there a way to byref 2 seperate pieces?
Hope that is clear,
Thanks!…
Added by Erin Colshan at 11:10am on March 24, 2011
ns South wind for BF since as in all Ladybug tools Y is North. I believe that's why I left it simply as a number in the UI window.
I should also add that the little crude way of creating a location in mesh that is inside the wind tunnel but outside the building (as it should) is not really working properly for multiple geometry inputs.
Kind regards,
Theodore.…
e support of the community that is the added value of these tools.
One question in relation to your sentence quoted below:
We need, and we will make, a more integrated approach in the near future.
In this integrated approach it could be possible to consider also a tool for acoustic simulations? This topic of June 2016 leaves no hope.
…
" (idiomatic) and easy way of doing things.So here come some basic questions:
Is there a way to create custom components by grouping an existing sub-network together? I'm looking for a way to re-use parts of a program (something similar to subroutines), and to make the network look less cluttered. I found that it is possible to group components (ctrl-g), but this still displays them as separate blocks (too much clutter), and provides no way to re-use a sub-network in such a way that if it is modified in one place, all it's instances (all the places where it is re-used) also get modified.
Is there a component that does nothing, just passes a signal through? Suppose I need to connect block A to blocks B1, B2, B3 (all three get the same input). Then I change my mind, and I decide to connect block C to these three, not A. In this case it will be necessary to change three connections, not just one. I'm looking for an easy way to do this by a single rewiring, not three. (This came up in a practical situation).
Finally, a related question: is there a component that acts as a switch, so I can choose which signal it passes through out of a possible set of choices? For example, suppose that a set of objects can be coloured based on a number of different properties (size, positions, rotation, etc.) I'm looking for a way to switch between these very easily, without the need to do much rewiring.
Thank you in advance for any replies / useful comments, even general ones on how to easily structure a large Grasshopper program/network.…
rence not set to an instance of an object. (line: 80)
Both .dlls appear to have been successfully imported.
Thanks in advance,
Charles
RStatSystem rs = ri as RStatSystem;
List<Line> slines = new List<Line>();
foreach(RStatBeam b0 in rs.Beams) { <------ line 80
if (b0.StiffnessMultiplier < 0.3) continue;
slines.Add(new Line(b0.P0.ToPoint3d(), b0.P1.ToPoint3d())); }
A = slines;
…
ents. I was thinking that it is necessary to install the Paraview software, but i see that no need (for this issue).
The laptop, as you said, is still refusing to cooperate, even though i uninstalled and reinstalled OF (as i did in the desktop).
For the illustration, this is an image with the error in the desktop:
-A.…
t 50% faster than Windows. Of course that is to be expected with a Docker installation.
Essentially, what BF will do is to help you run through the case preparation phase which is usually very time consuming. You can also use the write option in the run component to save the case and its files before you go to Linux.
Hope this helps! Please don't hesitate to add these issues in GitHub as well, or any other issue you might find.
Kind regards,
Theodore.…
(and TLDR) post (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/165322-openfoam-v3-0-a.html). Especially Wyldckat's post #13 onwards goes almost over the whole history of OF development and the nuances therein.
On a production side, we hope to have BF working with the new OF4.0 very soon. Actually it should already work as is even if you installed the new version up to the running the case. Post-processing would not however. We will try and include this in the next release.
Kind regards,
Theodore.…
to an instance of an object. (line: 79) error on the marked line.
private void RunScript(object ri, ref object A, ref object B){RStatSystem rs = ri as RStatSystem;
List<Line> slines = new List<Line>();
foreach(RStatBeam b0 in rs.Beams) {
if (b0.StiffnessMultiplier < 0.3) continue;
slines.Add(new Line(b0.P0.ToPoint3d(), b0.P1.ToPoint3d()));}
A = slines;}
Also to be more clear, I'm attaching a screenshot.
Does anyone know a solution for this?
Best,
Gediminas…
te high (~65° from my script).I actually wanted to reply back with results by running a test case on your script and the one I created to check if there are any fluctuations. Hopefully over the weekend I will get some time and do the test.
I am also planning to integrate wind results from BF by taking the same analysis plane for MRT and Wind Analysis. A bit time intensive but should be pretty straight forward. I will share the test case for review hopefully by the weekend.
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Saket…