n upload something for comment? Should give you some context on the project.
Have tried the GUID component. Only problem i have run into is i tried to feed this into a VB If statement and am getting errors.
If x = 32a6738d-65de-44fd-aa4a-53842af54c38 Then A = 1 End If
1. Error (BC30205): End of statement expected. (line 83)
Tried to convert to a string and got an error that GUID cannot convert...
Can you advise on how I can correct the above?
Cheers
Lyndon
…
Contour_V2 text panel is:
Error: Cannot implicitly convert type 'object[]' to 'RMA.OpenNURBS.IOnGeometry[]'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?) (line 93)
Another fella has had similar issues with Kangaroo that I am having, and he posted his woes at:
https://groups.google.com/group/kangaroophysics/browse_thread/thread/af4a3717a9a998f3/544aa78933e564e3?lnk=raot
Maybe these problems are related...
Many thanks...
Laurenz
…
eporting 41% of the time to be in extreme weather conditions.
Aditionally, I´m also running an analysis with the Ladybug_AdaptiveComfortChart, where the charts are displayed in Rhino, yet the outputs of the component doesn´t provide any data.
Any guidance would be appreciated!... Cheers,
Alejandro
…
nest and say that I don't have the necessary knowledge to fully understand the text yet. So I would love some explanation about the Echo Criterion Parameter of analysis in Pachyderm. How should I interpret it and what it means to the acoustical qualities of the space score "false" or "true" in this criterion?
Thank you in advance, cheers. …
(and the geometry it is based on) are not aligned to the world ucs, i perform this manually on each group of objects (the curve and the corresponding bb). this is quite time consuming.i would like to use grasshopper to streamline this, but the grasshopper bounding box component only solves world oriented geometry bounding boxes. also the rvb-script is not supported by grasshopper, so i have no idea how to start.does someone have an idea, if and how grasshopper could do this?thanks in advance for any comment roberto…
"Z" elevation and get their heights.
As this will be used by people in my office, the letter tagging vs numbered indices might get confusing.
I can't really leave them as numbers as the points are separated into various groups, ie. Pt Aa, Ab, Ac...
Pt Ba, Bb. Bc... and so forth.
With that being said, is it possible to rename indices and/or paths to strings other than their default numbering?…
component gives a warning about buckling in 1 or 2 modes. This also happens when I reduce the loads on the top chord, there are no loads on the bottom chord. For example:
> 92 kN/m no warning
83 kN/m buckling in 1 mode
50 kN/m buckling in 2 modes
<50 kN/m no warning
Since the truss is supported in the top chord against global buckling, this warning must be about the bottom chord? But the bottom chord doesn't have compressive forces, then what could this warning be about? And is there a way to check where it buckles (the modes in the warning)?
Thank you in advance!
Kind regards,
Cansu
…
18): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.Text' is obsolete: 'Use RichText or PlainText' (line 88)
2. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.FontIndex' is obsolete: 'Use Font property instead' (line 92)
3. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.RhinoDoc.Fonts' is obsolete: 'Use DimStyles table instead' (line 92)
1. Error (CS1061): 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' does not contain a definition for 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' and no extension method 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' accepting a first argument of type 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (line 94)
Wondering, if perhaps, you will be updating for Rhino 6 compatibility?
Cheers
Lyndon
…
1. Buy some anti gravity tissue (available on request by Fotiadis ACME Industries: any color you want, payment in advance, cash only).
2. Create a pavement with a rectangular hole. Use Buchtal Bosco tiles (the most expensive stuff around > we live once). Avoid trees (it's too late) and/or anything (Less is more).
http://www.agrob-buchtal.de/en/cd/produkte/produkte_seiten_2_19881.html?pe_id=88
3 .Put Vodka into the hole (I do hope Russian top stuff).
4. Do a semi submerged grid of tissues (vertical due to 1 - or your money back).
4. Provide armchairs to the spectators (these things take time). Put ZZTop on the stereo (or Cure). Empty your mind. Reset.
5. Wait for some appropriate wind and/or the 4 horsemen (whatever comes first).
Moral: ResetNowForEver…
rees west to 1 degree west). Changing the latitudinal domain from, say, 0:1 (the equator to 1 degree north) to 88:89 (88 degrees north to 89 degrees north), has zero effect on the x,y shape of the topography map generated. However, in reality, the map should be far, far thinner in the latter case, because longitudinal lines get closer together toward the north and south poles. In actuality, the shape should be close to a trapezoid in both cases, but this is probably not a necessary detail for most people producing maps, since, at an urban or smaller scale, the latitudinal lines bounding the north and south of the map will probably not be that significantly different in length. But the maps should at least stretch from close-to-square for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the equator to an extremely thin rectangle for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the north pole.
As an example, I'm looking at a location in Sheffield, UK. The relevant SRTM HGT file spans from 53 N to 54 N, and 2 W to 1 W. The length of the map in the north-south direction should be approximately 111 km, as is the case with the topo map generated by Elk (and a near-standard for 1 degree latitude anywhere in the world). The length of the map in the east-west direction, however, should be somewhere in the range of 67 km, since the 2 W and 1 W longitudinal lines are much closer together at this latitude than they are at the equator. Thus the map should be nearly twice as long in the North-South direction as it is wide in the East-West direction.
If this were to be sorted out, I think it would be really nice to then have the SRTM topo map be positioned automatically in relation to the OSM map being brought in. I think it's good that the OSM map is positioned at 0,0, rather than it's world coordinates, but maybe the SRTM topo map could be aligned with it based on the latitude and longitude domains we input to the SRTM grasshopper module.…