egin working on a design, we first have to systematically examine the resources and restrictions which, on the one hand, make every design project possible and, on the other hand, also define and delimit it. Knowing what we have to work with enables us to explore its boundaries and at the same time to venture beyond those boundaries. This is our studio’s sphere of action; our projects emerge as a critical reflection of the discipline of architecture, in its essence, on fundamental concepts, their general form, and their underlying media and processes. The goal of our work is to master a variety of forms of the architectural repertoire of the 20th century, but especially to develop and expand this repertoire, as has been happening in the past 20 years. The goal of this workshop is to introduce a series of these techniques and expertises and to apply the knowledge transfer on a given site in Timisoara. GUESTS: STUDIO ZAHA HADID VIENNA: http://www1.uni-ak.ac.at/architektur/ https://www.facebook.com/StudioHadidVienna Ass. Dipl.-Ing.MArch. AA Dist. Robert NEUMAYR-BEELITZ - lecturer/critic http://www.unsquare.at/ AProf. Mag.arch. Mag.theol. Johannes TRAUPMANN - critic http://www.pxt.at/ Univ.-Ass. Dipl.-Ing. Jens Erik MEHLAN - critic http://moh-architecture.com/ Univ.Stud.Ass. Daniel BOLOJAN - tutor - Grasshopper http://nonstandardstudio.wordpress.com/ Univ.Stud.Ass. Bogdan ZAHA - tutor - Maya http://bogdanzaha.tumblr.com/ LOCAL: Prof.Dr.Arh.Urb.Conf. Florin MACHEDON - critic (BUC)
more information on https://encodedfields.wordpress.com/…
tura digital en corte Láser, corte CNC, impresión 3d, y modelado paramétrico.
Este tercer taller enseña los fundamentos del modelado paramétrico y algunas bases de manufactura digital.
PERFIL DEL ALUMNO QUE INGRESA:
Diseñador, Arquitecto, Artista con conocimientos de Rhinoceros interesados en comenza a modelar paramétrico con Grasshopper para fabricación digital básica.
PERFIL DEL ALUMNO QUE EGRESA:
El alumno terminará con los conocimientos y criterios para el desarrollo de piezas o proyectos utilizando fabricación digital, mejorando y agilizando los flujos de trabajo, así como los criterios fundamentales del Modelado Paramétrico -Generativo.
Taller de modelado paramétrico con Grasshopper
Interfase
Manejo de Datos
Data Volátil
Data Persistente
Rangos y dominios
Atractores
Listas y Cull
Modelado por Layer Object
Análisis Básicos
Conexión de Curvas
Superficies
Análisis de Superficies
Panelización Básica
Relaciones con Excel
Modelado generativo
Fechas: del 8 de Febrero al 1º de Marzo
Días: Sábado
Horarios: de 10 am a 3 pm
Sesiones: 4 de 5hrs
Duración: 20 horas
Precio: $3,000.00…
is an emerging research area that exploits the principles and logic of natural systems in the design of the built environment. Sandworks* investigates the development of a computational design system informed by the sand self-formation behaviour. The knowledge objective is to understand the process of coding the material physical behaviour that follows the geometrical constraints of developable, ruled and hyperbolic surfaces formed by sand. Through physical and digital form-finding exercises, the workshop will explore the relationships between material and its shaping processes in the generation of form in parallel to theoretical lectures and discussion on cutting edge approaches of computational thinking, design and fabrication in architecture and design. Participants will be introduced to ruled based design thinking through digital design and fabrication systems as well as physical modelling and prototyping techniques.. The workshop aim is to provide an understanding framework of how such processes occur in nature and find their translation in the design of the artificial. *This research started at the Architectural Association school of architecture in London exploring the design and fabrication techniques of sand tectonic system and now it is pursued at ENSA Paris-Malaquias focusing on the development of the machinic morphogenetic possibilities of sand self-formation with robotic distribution of material through addition, subtraction and deposition techniques.www.sandworks.org /// Application To apply, please follow this link to fill the application form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1n_LN2svFTT79kCqndxznKRj4PX8J8__FVNKvjiHTeJU/viewform /// Fees* 1700 EGP for students / 2000 EGP for graduates and young professionals * 20 % discount for early registration and payment before 22 nd of August 2014 more info on the workshop webpage: http://www.encodestudio.net/#!sandworks/c1nn1…
of Crete. Chania can be divided in two parts: the old town and the modern city which is the larger one. The Visiting School will revisit the way by which the built environment has been put together and will explore design possibilities which can be applied in order to improve connectivity and functionality in the city. Interactive design coupled with generative form-finding techniques towards the fabrication and assembly of a 1-to-1 scale prototype will be investigated.
Each year a series of software tutorial sessions takes place in order to allow participants develop their basic skills on controlling models parametrically and on producing interactive presentations. These sessions also embody manufacturing techniques enabling a hands‐on experience on the realization of an architectural design. In addition, a set of lectures and special events are carried out to enable the participants advance their understanding in matters of new design anatomies and begin developing a theoretical background on topics including machinic control, computational space, and complexity in systems, and innovative urban design approaches.
Prominent Features of the workshop/ skills developed
• Participants become part of an active learning environment where the large tutor to student ratio allows for personalized tutorials and debates.
• The toolset of AA Greece includes but is not limited to Maya, Rhinoceros, and Grasshopper.
• Design seminars and lecture series support the key objectives of the programme, disseminating fundamental design techniques and relevant critical thinking methodologies.
Eligibility
The workshop is open to architecture and design students and professionals worldwide.
Accreditation
Participants receive the AA Visiting School Certificate with the completion of the Programme.
Applications
The deadline for applications is 20 September 2016.. No portfolio or CV, only requirement is the online application form and fees. Online application link:
https://www.aaschool.ac.uk/STUDY/ONLINEAPPLICATION/visitingApplication.php?schoolID=377
For more information:
http://greece.aaschool.ac.uk/
Contact:
Alexandros Kallegias (Programme Director):
Alexandros.Kallegias@aaschool.ac.uk…
t the maximum potential with the bridge BIM+PARAMETRIC DESIGN ;D
During this Intense Week, we will learn about the power of Rhino + Grasshopper + ArchiCAD with Professional and Useful examples for our Normal Working day :D
You will get Advanced Library Files + Personal Web + Knowledge and Skills to start using this incredible Methodology ;D
Also, the week is having Lectures from different Experts sharing their Computational Working Experiences ;D And Jam Sessions! opening the door to 5 interesting topics to research, learn and experiment together :D
2020 is your YEAR ;D !!!
Complete details and registration……
r visual programming tools in the games world. MS's Kodu, looks interesting. Kismet and Visual3d look even more interesting..... mainly because they are more 'interactive' or 'reactive', rather than DAG-based.
Seems like the evolution path for GH-similar apps is:
1. base 3d or CAD app based on C/C++ code.
2. Add scripting language interface
3. Add some kind of visual interface
4. Add graph sorting / propagation engine
5. Re-jig base 3d or CADD app to make managed/interpreted scripts run faster, multi-threaded.
6. Add dynamic typed language, DLR stuff
6. ....
6. Add constraints solver...?
7. Rebuild CAD display engine to be procedural at the GPU level?
Seems like there are available tools for converting scripts into some kind of flowchart. There are even visual debuggers. MS even has something called the 'Debugger Canvas'. Spreadsheet constraints.
Seems like the time is ripe for lots of new apps like GH.
…
llet Distance]
[Slider=0..1..10]-->[D][Fillet Distance]
[Slider=1..5..20]-->[F][Unit Z]
[Fillet Distance][C]-->[B][Extrude]
[Unit Z][V]-->[D][Extrude]
This still leaves the problem of having more than one of a single component on the canvas. Referral can be made unambiguous by simply picking the most recent component with the same name. But how do you indicate you want a second Polyline component?
Possible solutions:
Separators in the text:[Point=SetMultiplePoints]-->[V][Polyline]----------------------------------[Point=SetMultiplePoints]-->[V][Polyline]
Keywords or symbols to indicate the creation of a new component rather than the re-use of an existing one:new [Point=SetMultiplePoints]--> new [V][Polyline]new [Point=SetMultiplePoints]--> new [V][Polyline]
(2) is a lot more flexible and (1) may not work at all as it will prevent any reuse above and below the separator.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com…
l design.
2/ Optimization
2.1/ in prefabrication
2.2/ combinatorial
2.3/ approach comparisons (i.e. deterministic vs stochastic)
2.4/ share your research
2.5/ ... etc. the list goes on and on
3/ Share you design rationale and how computation fits in
4/ Need help with this problem...
5/ Challenges and workshops announcements
6/ CD News
7/ Share computational design projects under construction or built (akin to skyscrapercity)
8/ and so many other categories and sub-categories...
Just my first thoughts. That breakdown in optimization is just an example. Maybe 'sections' is an old-school way of seeing things, I just wanted to share some thoughts on the kind of content I look forward to seeing. It can be pragmatic topics, but also theoretical, and allow folks to share their projects and research. Some categories are specific, others broad. I suppose I'm interested in community building with regards to computational design. I think SmartGeometry attempted to accomplish this at some point in the past, to some degree. However their focus appears to be in the workshops and challenges.
I recall the silly flame wars that the CG industry had 20 years ago (lame). I'd avoid that, even if it meant forbidding the mention of any specific software in certain areas or in the entire forum. Which would be tricky, but the endless flame wars and silly comparisons were such a waste of everyone's time in CG.
Without dwelling on this too much yet, I think that the software specific questions belong in software specific forums. If we already had a common language for computational design, you'd just need to add the right description as a meta-tag to any Dynamo or Grasshopper forum post, and you'd be able to find analogous solutions in either forum effortlessly, right?
The Dynamo and Grasshopper forums lack design-centric content. The emphasis is generally on the tools and workflow. Computational design is hybrid in essence, it involves both design and computer programming (be it visual or textual). We could really use a forum for knowledge exchange where the expectation is that both are discussed with equal status.
I disagree that such a forum ought to exclude professional programmers. It should include professional programmers whom have an interest in design, and also include professional designers whom have an interest in computer programming, and everyone in between, and enthusiasts, and artists whom are curious about algorithms as a creative medium, and academics, and students, and etc etc. As long as there is rich content and activity on design as well, not only the computational bit, then the crowd will be diverse and we'll all have more to learn from one another.…
d. If what you say is correct about the small difference between the global horizontal and direct/diffuse calculations in the MENEX model, than the discrepancy likely has more to do with the difference between the approximation of human geometry in the MENEX model (plane or cylinder) and the human geometry approximation in the SolarCal model (some coefficients derived from radiation studies of mannequins). I noticed some fairly large differences between using a suggested global horizontal method and a direct/diffuse method with the SolarCal model (differences on the order of 20%) but I imagine that this is because a mannequin human geometry is more sensitive to changes in solar orientation than a cylinder or plane. All of this is very good to know.
Yes, I guess this might be the case: the sensitivity of the SolarCal model to different parts of human body surfaces and surfaces areas.
Am I correct in understanding that you recently corrected the grey-body assumption about sky temperature in the Thermal Comfort Indices component with this commit? https://github.com/mostaphaRoudsari/ladybug/commit/a2a37b6dccc4e750...
The previous incoming long-wave radiation was derived by Ångström for clear sky conditions. The added correction "(1 + 0.22*((N/10)**2.75))" is a fractional cloudiness factor by Maykut and Church (I attached the publication below which mentions it).
So the emissivity coefficient of the (cloudy) sky is now:
epsilon_sky = (0.82 - 0.25*(10**(-0.094*0.75*e))) * (1 + 0.22*((N/10)**2.75))
I do not think that you could use the same value to calculate the sky temperature with Stefan-Boltzmann law, as the incoming long-wave radiation has been derived from the air temperature (2 meters above the ground), not the sky temperature. So by:
skyTemp = (La / [epsilon_sky * sigma])^0.25 - 273.15
One would get the air temperature from which La is derived, not skyTemp.The possible reason why SolCal Mean radiant temperature is currently getting similar values to Thermal Comfort Indices Mean radiant temperature could be that fact your epsilon_sky is almost equal to 1 (0.95), so it depends solely on La.I spoke with Dr. Blazejczyk, and got a publication on different sky temperature models. Apart from upper mentioned Swinbank, Berdahl-Martin, Melchor it has a lot more methods with mutual comparison of their resulting values. I attached it below.…
d react in length to the variation of their respective angle deviation from the sun.
For the moment I have established a way that depending on Bigger than/Smaller than X value, there is a dispatch of data to produce to types of panel lenghts. As you can see on the image.
But I would be interested to find the way to organize the list of all angles and classify them in groups like 5 packages of 20 degrees deviation. So, the panels deviated 16,3 and 27,9 degrees would go in the package of 15-35º, for example, and the 33,1 would go in the 35-45º...etc..
And the question would be to assign the different groups of angles, to given positions for the vectors that define the panel surfaces.
I am confused at how I should tackle this problem. Is it a question of dividing domains? Or creating sublists? But then, how can I assign the data to a set of positions? Dispatch only works with A/B..
And if so, how could I limit the positions of the vectors that define the surfaces, to a min and max length that would not overlap out of the base pattern?
These are huge questions, eh? But I'm sure that someone has tackled this problem before...
Looks like an accumulation of pretty standard problems,..but all together!
Thanks a million for any examples or hints on how this could work!
M.A.
StepStudies_20100815.3dm
StepStudies_20100815.ghx
…