I don't think I know what you mean. If it is that you want the curve numbers written out as text tags, use the reworked example below and adjust it to your needs.
/Ola
old version that has been fixed by now. I'd ask you to test this on the Rhino6 beta (which I am using to test this), but it looks like you're using a cracked version of Rhino so you probably don't have access to that.…
omponent that increases in the x-axis (example below).
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 etc...B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 etc...C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 etc...D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 etc...
This is as far as I've gotten:
I have collected my points on the grid into a "List Length" component and input that into a "Series" which input into a "Function" with the expression Format("A{0}",x). The result labeling resembles the example below.
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 etc...
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.…
rotate back to zero degree (start position) then don't rotate, then rotate to -80 degree, then back to zero degree (start position) and stay there.
I hope the you can help me.
Thank you.
…
e multiple matches. Go to this buy bd diesel canada to buy best canada diesel at cheap prices. If you had a list of phone numbers and wanted to replace them all with ‘1’, you would use the Replace String component:…
Added by Andy Murray at 1:35am on October 22, 2022
GH) > then define (still in GH) some instance definition (or many: case variants) > then place it according some "policy" (3d point grid and the likes). Note: Only doable with code, mind (C# in my case).
Obviously you can skip the creation part and instruct GH to deal with instance definitions already listed in the Block Manager (say: find the block named "cell666_B3" blah, blah) ... but that means that you can only use them (meaning a rather "limited" parametric approach) and not make them from scratch (meaning a true parametric approach).
But I guess that you've tried the block way in the Rhino environment already. That said I use rather solely this approach in GH and yields quite manageable object collections - I would say "real-time" response (up to 20K instances) but I use dedicated Xeon E5 1630 V3 workstations (with NVida Quadros K4200 and up for the graphic response part of the equation) so the "performance" is rather a subjective thing.
Modifications:
easily doable with GH (on instance definitions at placing time: since you need only to scale them and not vary their topology).
Anyway post a portion of the R file.…