moved by random amounts in a random direction. The animated slider was the amount of deviation from the original points. And yes, I used culled lists.B.t.w. did you find my workaround for your loft? Did your notebook explode? ;)…
0.533000void brightfunc skyfunc2 skybright perezlum.cal010 1.382e+00 3.201e-01 1.066879 -0.754821 0.015485 -0.048998 -0.089403 0.066341 -0.860010 0.505947
The values in bold are then evaluated using the equations in the file perezlum.cal inside the RAYPATH directory in Radiance..
{ All-weather Angular Sky Luminance Distribution . Additional arguments required for calculation of skybright: A1 - diffus normalization A2 - ground brightness A3,A4,A5,A6,A7 - coefficients for the Perez model A8,A9,A10 - sun direction}skybright = wmean((Dz+1.01)^10, intersky, (Dz+1.01)^-10, A2 );wmean(a, x, b, y) = (a*x+b*y)/(a+b);intersky = if( (Dz-0.01), A1 * (1 + A3*Exp(A4/Dz) ) * ( 1 + A5*Exp(A6*gamma) + A7*cos(gamma)*cos(gamma) ), A1 * (1 + A3*Exp(A4/0.01) ) * ( 1 + A5*Exp(A6*gamma) + A7*cos(gamma)*cos(gamma) ) );
This data is then mapped to the "glow" material that represents the celestial hemisphere...You can edit the climate based sky produced by Honeybee and enter your own values. The other option would be to just use gendaylit from DOS Prompt.…
ole refresh part so that it will try one combination at a time. I dont have a full understanding of how to do this given that everything in GH is runtime.
Outputs: A,B,C,D
A0: Cat
B0: Cat
C0: Cat
D0: Cat
A1: Cat
A2: Cat
A3: Cat
A4: Dog
etc, per refresh.....…
exact formula is inside /lib/skybright.cal if this can help you to find the name.
{ RCSid: $Id$ } { Sky brightness function for sunny and cloudy skies.
Additional arguments required for calculation of skybright:
A1 - 1 for CIE clear, 2 for CIE overcast, 3 for uniform, 4 for CIE intermediate A2 - zenith brightness A3 - ground plane brightness A4 - normalization factor based on sun direction A5,A6,A7 - sun direction }
cosgamma = Dx*A5 + Dy*A6 + Dz*A7;
gamma = Acos(cosgamma); { angle from sun to this point in sky }
zt = Acos(A7); { angle from zenith to sun }
eta = Acos(Dz); { angle from zenith to this point in sky }
wmean(a, x, b, y) : (a*x + b*y) / (a + b);
skybr = wmean((Dz+1.01)^10, select(A1, sunnysky, cloudysky, unifsky, intersky), (Dz+1.01)^-10, A3);
sunnysky = A2 * (.91 + 10*exp(-3*gamma) + .45*cosgamma*cosgamma) * if( Dz - .01, 1.0 - exp(-.32/Dz), 1.0) / A4;
cloudysky = A2 * (1 + 2*Dz)/3;
unifsky = A2;
intersky = A2 * ( (1.35*sin(5.631-3.59*eta)+3.12)*sin(4.396-2.6*zt) + 6.37 - eta ) / 2.326 * exp(gamma*-.563*((2.629-eta)*(1.562-zt)+.812)) / A4;
…
a working solution with replacing this line of code with:
Dim charList As New List(Of Char)(charArr)
Is this because of a version incompatibility (I'm using Rhino 4.0, and GH 0.8.0062)? Just curious.
Regards,
JJ…
f the mesh was self-intersecting everywhere. So instead I used Millipede (isosurface) to get the same undulations, but ignore the complex 'folds', you can see the difference in cross section thickness. I then tessellated it with the inverse pattern of the outer surface.
To make it a single 3d printable mesh, i just deleted a single face on inner and outer skin, then lofted the naked edges. (creating a tiny hole through the model). Therefore creating a single mesh that folds in on itself, not sure if there is a better way of defining the space between two meshes as the solid area...
Full GH (Kangaroo - Meshmachine - Weaverbird - Millipede)
Special thanks to Laurent Delrieu for his interesting offset mesh method that i based my approach on.
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/offset-mesh-problems-with-3d-mesh-with-weaverbird…
Added by Nick Tyrer at 5:25am on December 10, 2015
gone with the wind topic: since this is utterly Academic the main issue here is to oversimplify LBS (in real life: a collection of columns/beams/slabs/X members + tube frame rigid members (shafts/elevators/cats/dogs)). Reason is that if we use the real "solids" (turned into meshes) as the "node" pool for the hinges required ... only HAL 9000 could solve it in "real-time" (for instance an E5 Xeon 1630 v3 takes ... several minutes). And this is ... er ... challenging I must say. This is a typical case where "simplifying" means "stupidity" almost instantly.
Spam on:
where's my collection of "bend-a-truss-that-looks-like-a-tower" K1 demo defs? Is in this workstation or in another? (blame Alzheimer).
Spam off.
More soon.…
g these times itself). If it works on selection alone, it would probably implement faster.
Theoretically, does this mean the total solving time of the definition is the 'chain of components' that takes the longest time? In the picture above, it would be the chain consisting 'point-curve-divideDistance'?
Because that still adds up only to 97%, I am assuming the Point and Slider component start solving in parallel, and the two Divide components also start solving in parallel?…