for waves, that is done with a 'phase shift', add 2*pi/4 radians (for a 90 deg shift) to your sin curve, could also be done using cos instead of sin for an inherent 90 deg shift
Added by mark zirinsky at 7:37pm on November 9, 2016
Two things:
90 X 5 is wrong. There are 360 degrees in a circle so just use a constant (360), or 90 X 4.
Don't flatten the output of 'Flip' before 'IntCrv'.
ptimization of any kind. If I were to add a space voxelization algorithm to it I could probably do away with 90% of the force vectors in a large particle cloud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmsbzTf79bc
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
Added by David Rutten at 5:35am on December 16, 2009
gone with the wind topic: since this is utterly Academic the main issue here is to oversimplify LBS (in real life: a collection of columns/beams/slabs/X members + tube frame rigid members (shafts/elevators/cats/dogs)). Reason is that if we use the real "solids" (turned into meshes) as the "node" pool for the hinges required ... only HAL 9000 could solve it in "real-time" (for instance an E5 Xeon 1630 v3 takes ... several minutes). And this is ... er ... challenging I must say. This is a typical case where "simplifying" means "stupidity" almost instantly.
Spam on:
where's my collection of "bend-a-truss-that-looks-like-a-tower" K1 demo defs? Is in this workstation or in another? (blame Alzheimer).
Spam off.
More soon.…