starting as soon as possible.
We're offering challenging projects, insights and contact to leading industry companies, project responsibilities according to abilities and initiative, great work environment and laid-back atmosphere, room to play and evolve,...
Our ideal candidate:
- is passionate about construction, engineering and (computational) design
- is proficient in Rhino / Grasshopper / (GH-)Python
- knows his ways around the Adobe Suite and MS Office
- has a current work permit for Germany
- is a German speaker (other native speakers also welcome, with excellent English skills)
- has an architectural background (Student / BA / MA /...), ideally with work experience
- is interested / has experience in digital manufacturing and prototyping
- will be able to join us shortly
We're looking forward to your applications / inquiries / CVs to: mpelzer@fat-lab.de
View our past projects here: www.fat-lab.com
(Current projects, unfortunately, are non-disclosed)
…
ther math and logic. i can usually conceptualise what i want to do and cobble some semi working thing together but don't know which components to use and how to patch it. so i'm super happy to have someone who knows what he's doing to find this interesting.
and i'm glad you mention the fanned frets again, there is one input parameter that's still missing for the multiscale frets to be fully parametric, it's the angle of the nut or which fret should be straight. it depends a bit on personal preferences and playing posture what is more comfortable. so being able to adjust this easily would be cool. again i have no idea how the maths for that work or if you can just rotate each fret the same amount around it's middle point. The input either as fret number (for the straight fret) or as a simple slider from bridge to nut should do as input setting.
Here are the two extremes and the middle ground:
i've been thinkin today while analysing your patches and cleaning up my mess what exactly the monster should do.
Here are the input parameters needed, i think it's the complete list
scale length low E string
scale length high e string
fret angle/straight fret
string width at nut
string width at bridge
number of frets
fretboard overhang at nut (distance from string to fretboard bounds)
fretboard overhang at last fret
string gauges
string tensions
fretboard radius at nut (for compound radius fretboard radius at bridge is calculated with the stewmac formula)
fretwire crown width
fretwire crown height
action height at nut (distance between bottom of string and fretwire crown top)
action height at last fret
pickup 1 neck position
pickup 2 middle position
pickup 3 bridge position
nut width
the pickup positions should be used to draw circles for the magnet poles on each string so they are perfectly aligned and can be used for the pickup flatwork construction. ideally they would need a rotation control aligning the center line of the pickup so it's somewher between the last fret angle and bridge angle. personally i do this visually depending on the design i'm looking for, some people have huge theories on pickup positioning but personally i don't believe in it.
that should result in everything needed to quickly generate all the necessary construction curves or geometry for nut/fingerboard/frets/pickups. this is the core of what makes a guitar work, the more precise this dynamic system is the better the guitar plays and sounds.
i posted another thread trying to understand how i could use datasets form spreadsheets,databse, csv to organize the input parameters. What would make sense for the strings for example is hook into a spreadsheet with the different string sets, i attached one for the d'Addario NYXL string line which basically covers all combos that make sense.
The string tension is an interesting one, and implmenting it would sure be overkill albeit super interesting to try. it should be possible to extrapolate from the scale length of each string what the tension for a given string gauge of that string would be so that you could say 'i want a fully balanced set' or 'heavy top light bottom) and it would calculate which SKU from d'addario would best match the required tension. All the strings listed in the spreadsheet are available as single strings to buy.
i'm trying to reorganize everything which helps me understand it. i just discovered the 'hidden wires' feature which is great since once i understood what a certain block does or have finished one of my own, i can get the wires out of the way to carry on undistracted. a bit risky to hide so many wires but it makes it so much easier not to get completely lost :-)
btw, the 'fanned fret' term is trademarked, some guy tried to patent it in the 80's which is a bit silly since it has been done for centuries. there is a level of sophistication above this as well, check out http://www.truetemperament.com/ and that really is something else. it really is astounding how superior the tuning is on those wigglefrets, the problem is that it's rather awkward for string bending and also you can't easily recrown or level the frets when they are used. …
e matching with a dedicated component which creates combinations of items. You can find the [Cross Reference] component in the Sets.List panel.
When Grasshopper iterates over lists of items, it will match the first item in list A with the first item in list B. Then the second item in list A with the second item in list B and so on and so forth. Sometimes however you want all items in list A to combine with all items in list B, the [Cross Reference] component allows you to do this.
Here we have two input lists {A,B,C} and {X,Y,Z}. Normally Grasshopper would iterate over these lists and only consider the combinations {A,X}, {B,Y} and {C,Z}. There are however six more combinations that are not typically considered, to wit: {A,Y}, {A,Z}, {B,X}, {B,Z}, {C,X} and {C,Y}. As you can see the output of the [Cross Reference] component is such that all nine permutations are indeed present.
We can denote the behaviour of data cross referencing using a table. The rows represent the first list of items, the columns the second. If we create all possible permutations, the table will have a dot in every single cell, as every cell represents a unique combination of two source list indices:
Sometimes however you don't want all possible permutations. Sometimes you wish to exclude certain areas because they would result in meaningless or invalid computations. A common exclusion principle is to ignore all cells that are on the diagonal of the table. The image above shows a 'holistic' matching, whereas the 'diagonal' option (available from the [Cross Reference] component menu) has gaps for {0,0}, {1,1}, {2,2} and {3,3}:
If we apply this to our {A,B,C}, {X,Y,Z} example, we should expect to not see the combinations for {A,X}, {B,Y} and {C,Z}:
The rule that is applied to 'diagonal' matching is: "Skip all permutations where all items have the same list index". 'Coincident' matching is the same as 'diagonal' matching in the case of two input lists which is why I won't show an example of it here (since we are only dealing with 2-list examples), but the rule is subtly different: "Skip all permutations where any two items have the same list index".
The four remaining matching algorithms are all variations on the same theme. 'Lower triangle' matching applies the rule: "Skip all permutations where the index of an item is less than the index of the item in the next list", resulting in an empty triangle but with items on the diagonal.
'Lower triangle (strict)' matching goes one step further and also eliminates the items on the diagonal:
'Upper Triangle' and 'Upper Triangle (strict)' are mirror images of the previous two algorithms, resulting in empty triangles on the other side of the diagonal line:
…
nowledge, tools, materials and machines. The Clusters provide a focus for workshop participants working together within a common framework.
Clusters provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, processes and techniques and act as a catalyst for design resolution. The Workshop is made up of ten Clusters that respond in diverse ways to the sg2012 Challenge Material Intensities. The Call for Clusters is now open to proposals which respond in innovative ways to this year's challenge.
Deadline: September 19 2011
More information can be found here:
http://smartgeometry.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=129&Itemid=146
sg2012 takes place from 19-24 March 2012 at EMPAC (http://empac.rpi.edu/) and is hosted by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, upstate New York USA. The Workshop and Conference will be a gathering of the global community of innovators and pioneers in the fields of architecture, design and engineering.
The event will be in two parts: a four day Workshop 19-22 March, and a public conference beginning with Talkshop 23 March, followed by a Symposium 24 March. The event follows the format of the highly successful preceding events sg2010 Barcelona and sg2011 Copenhagen.
sg2012 Challenge Material Intensities
Simulation, Energy, Environment
Imagine the design space of architecture was no longer at the scale of rooms, walls and atria, but that of cells, grains and vapour droplets. Rather than the flow of people, services, or construction schedules, the focus becomes the flow of light, vapour, molecular vibrations and growth schedules: design from the inside out.
The sg2012 challenge, Material Intensities, is intended to dissolve our notion of the built environment as inert constructions enclosing physically sealed spaces. Spaces and boundaries are abundant with vibration, fluctuating intensities, shifting gradients and flows. The materials that define them are in a continual state of becoming: a dance of energy and information.Material potential is defined by multiple properties: acoustical, chemical, electrical, environmental, magnetic, manufacturing, mechanical, optical, radiological, sensorial, and thermal. The challenge for sg2012 Material Intensities is to consider material economy when creating environments, micro-climates and contexts congenial for social interaction, activities and organisation. This challenge calls for design innovation and dialogue between disciplines and responsibilities.sg2010 Working Prototypes strove to emancipate digital design from the hard drive by moving from the virtual to the actual in wrestling with the tangible world of physical fabrication. sg2011 Building the Invisible focused on informing digital design with real world data. sg2012 Material Intensities strives to energise our digital prototypes and infuse them with material behaviour. They have the potential to become rich simulations informed by the material dynamics, chemical composition, energy flows, force fields and environmental conditions that feed back into the design process.
More information can be found at http://www.smartgeometry.org…
greatly appreciate it!!
You can write the number of the question and write your answer next to it, example:
1) a
2) c
3) a) Washington University in St. Louis
4) 2 weeks (1week+1week shipping)
5) 130
6) b
7) b
The survey questions are as follows:
1)
Did you 3D print before?
5)
How much did it cost (in dollars)?
a.
Yes, for a school project
a.
Between 20 & 50
b.
Yes, for a personal project
b.
Between 50 & 80
c.
Between 80 & 120
2)
Print size
d.
Please specify if otherwise: _____ dollars
a.
Between 2 & 6 cubic inches
b.
Between 6 & 12 cubic inches
6)
Do you think the price was expensive?
c.
Between 12 & 20 cubic inches
a.
Not at all
d.
Please specify if otherwise: ____cubic inches
b.
A little bit expensive
c.
Very expensive
3)
Where did you print your object?
a.
School
7)
Were you satisfied with the printed object?
b.
Outside school: _________________
a.
Yes, it was a great print without problems
b.
Not bad, some issues
4)
How long did it take to print?
c.
I was not satisfied, very bad quality
a.
___ days
b.
___ weeks
Thank you very much to all!!
PS: If you did many 3D prints, you can post multiple answers.
Wassef…
whole design intent, but this is what Inventor is good at. The way it packages bits of 'scripted' components into 'little models' that can be stored and re-assembled is central to MCAD working.
The Inventor model shown is almost 5 years old. We don't model like that any more, however it does offer a good idea of general MCAD modeling approaches.
iParts is useful in certain situations, it could've been useful in the above model, its usefulness is often in function of the quantity of variants/configurations.
So much is scripted in GH, maybe it should also be possible to script/define/constrain/assist the placement/gluing of the results?
...
Starting point: I think we are talking across purposes. AFAIK, the solving sequence of GH's scripted components is fixed. It won't do circular dependencies... without a fight. The inter-component dependencies not 'managed' like constraints solvers do for MCAD apps.
Components and assemblies are individual files in MCAD.
Placement of these within assemblies in MCAD is a product of matrix transforms and persistent constraints. There is no bi-directional link, the link is unidirectional (downflow only), because of the use of proxies.
Consequently, scripting the placement of components is irrelevant in GH, unless you decide that each component needs to be contained in its own separate file.
This also brings up the point that generating components and assemblies in MCAD is not as straightforward. In iParts and iAssemblies, each configuration needs to be generated as a "child" (the individual file needs to be created for each child) before those children can be used elsewhere.
You notice the dilemma, if you generate 100 parts, and then you realize you only need 20, you've created 80 extra parts which you have no need for, thus generating wasteful data that may cause file management issues later on.
GH remains in a transient world, and when you decide to bake geometry (if you need to at all), you can do that in one Rhino file, and save it as the state of the design at that given moment. Very convenient for design, though unacceptable for most non-digital manufacturing methods, which greatly limits Rhino's use for manufacturing unless you combine it with an MCAD app.
One of the reasons why the distributed file approach makes perfect sense in MCAD, is that in industry you deal with a finite set of objects. Generative tools are usually not a requirement. Most mechanical engineers, product engineers and machinists would never have any use for that.
The other thing that MCAD apps like Inventor have, is the 'structured' interface that offers up all that setting out information like the coordinate systems, work planes, parameters etc in a concise fashion in the 'history tree'. This will translate into user speed. GH's canvas is a bit more freeform. I suppose the info is all there and linked, so a bit of re-jigging is easy. Also, see how T-Flex can even embed sliders and other parameter input boxes into the model itself. Pretty handy/fast to understand, which also means more speed.
True. As long as you keep the browser pane/specification tree organized and easy to query.
:)
Would love to understand what you did by sketching.
I'll start by showing what was done years ago in the Inventor model, and then share with you what I did in GH, but in another post.
Let's use one of the beams as an example:
We can isolate this component for clarity.
Notice that I've highlighted the sectional sketch with dimensions, and the point of reference, which is in relation to the CL of the column which the beam bears on. The orientation and location of the beam is already set by underlying geometry.
Here's a perspective view of the same:
The extent of the beam was also driven by reference geometry, 2 planes offset from the beam's XY plane, driven by parameters from another underlying file which serves as a parameter container:
Reference axes and points are present for all other components, here are some of them:
It starts getting cluttered if you see the reference planes as well:
Is I mentioned earlier, over time we've found better ways to define and associate geometry, parameters, manage design change, improving the efficiency of parametric models. But this model is a fair representation of a basic modeling approach, and since an Inventor-GH comparison is like comparing apples and oranges anyways, this model can be used to understand the differences and similarities, for those interested.
I haven't even gotten to your latest post yet, I will eventually.…
Added by Santiago Diaz at 10:36am on February 26, 2011
mers considering extreme sports reject mainstream retailers and like to check out small stores rather of at chains plus malls. Several smaller retailers discuss trends in sports shoe sales. http://skateszone.com/
Though athletic shoes and sports stores and from doorways retailers have reported somewhat uptick in footwear sales due to the increase in extreme sports, the particular beneficiaries inside the trend are independent surf and skate niche stores.
Some West Coast surf and skate shops stated teenagers and even more youthful Generation Xers are not only rejecting traditional sports, but they're also shunning mainstream retailers and malls meant for smaller niche shops transporting hard-to-come-by brands.
Eddie Miyoshi, district manager at Atomic Garage, a 3-store chain situated in Gardena, Calif., stated the soaring recognition of skateboard footwear has boosted the retailer's total footwear business 20-thirty percent this year, rather of '95.
Skate footwear presently represent 80-90 % of Atomic Garage's shoe sales, while couple of years back, Dr. Martens and Timberland drove the retailer's footwear business.
Like many retailers, Miyoshi pointed to Airwalk since the trend's catalyst.
However, if Airwalk broadened its distribution to larger chains, which are frequently located in malls, only a few skate shoe customers adopted. Rather, many youthful males have switched for your skate shops for additional elusive brands like Etnies, Duffs, and Electricity Footwear by Circus. By refusing to market bigger retailers or sports stores, these brands are increasing their cachet among youthful consumers.
"Kids don't want stuff which have been within the shops,In . Miyoshi added.
Searching ahead, Miyoshi forecasted skate shoe sales will remain strong through spring '97 provided "the [hot] vendors don't auction other [non-particularly shop] retailers."
"Skaters and non-skaters are rebelling against mainstream retailers so on to surf and skate shops for many looks," echoed Mark Richards, co-online sources Val Surf, a 3-store chain situated in North Hollywood, Calif. Soaring sales of skate footwear have driven total footwear receipts up 25 percent this year rather of '95.
"The quantity of that increase might be connected while using exposure of maximum games? I am unsure. [Skate footwear] may also be actually the think about the moment,In . Richards acknowledged. And in relation to getting this right look, youthful customers can be very picky.
"Skateboard footwear is a huge category for people, but we're not able to own the brands, Etnies, Duffs, Electricity and Nice, simply because they won't sell us," stated Mark Anderson, buyer at Chick's Sports, a six-store chain in Covina, Calif. "We have people coming every single day requesting them." Consequently, skate footwear have consistently ongoing to obtain about 5 % of Chick's overall footwear business. http://skateszone.com/the-top-8-best-skateboards-for-beginners-reviews-2017/
Nonetheless, some outdoors, niche sports and sports retailers are noting the growing recognition and coverage of maximum sports will receive a modest impact on footwear sales. Trailrunning footwear and approach/outdoors crosstrainers will be the two groups benefiting the very best inside the recognition. Like the skate shoe business, some retailers realize that styling instead of function frequently drives sales of individuals footwear.
"At this time the merchandise is a lot more visual than function," stated Chet James, gm of Super Jock 'N Jill, Dallas, speaking about trailrunning footwear. Still, James noted the current hype over adventure sports helps draw more customer traffic. "The marketing campaigns and media help bring growing figures of people in, nonetheless they frequently occasions day an issue that increases results on their own account,Inch he conceded.
John Wilkinson, executive vp inside the 85-store chain Track 'N Trail, Eldorado Hillsides, Calif., stated the shop has "seen some activity in approach footwear," but he requested the amount of consumers depend in it commercially sport. And, instead of accelerating total footwear business, Wilkinson speculated elevated sales of approach footwear and trailrunners are gnawing away at traditional hiking shoe and boot volume.
But Dan Bazinet, president of Overland Exchanging, a 34-store chain situated in Westford, Mass., believes the company-new looks have breathed existence for the wilting hiking boot category. "[Approach-type footwear] don't represent the lion's participate the hiking market, nonetheless they have elevated the hiking business and provided us extra sales," Bazinet stated.
He designated Timberland's Treeline Series and Rockport's Leadville line as strong performers. Unsurprisingly, he noted the company-new looks are attractive to youthful consumer base than traditional hikers.
For that month of June, sales of men's hikers were up 49 percent at Overland, rather of June '95, while sales of women's hikers were up 17 % for that month. Bazinet also attributed elevated sales that shops walked inside the hiking business, departing that business for that specialists.
Some retailers draw a good example concerning the hiking boom of two yrs ago combined with the current extreme sport phenomenon. "Plenty of bigger chains will get a specific percent in the industry while [extreme] sports remain a fad because they are selling cost-point type gear," described Steven Carre, assistant hard goods buyer at Adventure 16, a six-store chain situated in Hillcrest.
"However individuals [true enthusiasts] will say `we need real gear' and may shown up at us. That will help us after a while. What Size Skateboard good for an 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 year old
…
[2 of 8] No context surfaces...5. [3 of 8] Writing geometry...6. [4 of 8] Writing Electric Load Center - Generator specifications ...7. [5 of 8] Writing materials and constructions...8. [6 of 8] Writing schedules...9. [7 of 8] Writing loads and ideal air system...10. [8 of 8] Writing outputs...11. ...... idf file is successfully written to : C:\Users\Personal\Desktop\TESI\x006\THOR001\EnergyPlus\THOR001.idf12. 13. Analysis is running!...14. C:\Users\Personal\Desktop\TESI\x006\THOR001\EnergyPlus\eplusout.csv15. ......
Done! Read below for errors and warnings:
16. 17. Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 8.3.0-6d97d074ea, YMD=2016.01.17 17:56,IDD_Version 8.3.018. 19. ** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.20. 21. ************* Beginning Zone Sizing Calculations22. 23. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)24. 25. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00126. 27. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_NORD1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00128. 29. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)30. 31. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.32. 33. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)34. 35. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00136. 37. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_NORD1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00138. 39. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)40. 41. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.42. 43. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)44. 45. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00146. 47. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_NORD1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00148. 49. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)50. 51. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.52. 53. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)54. 55. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00156. 57. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_NORD1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00158. 59. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)60. 61. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.62. 63. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)64. 65. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00166. 67. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00168. 69. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)70. 71. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.72. 73. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)74. 75. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00176. 77. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00178. 79. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)80. 81. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.82. 83. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)84. 85. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00186. 87. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00188. 89. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)90. 91. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.92. 93. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)94. 95. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=00196. 97. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE00198. 99. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)100. 101. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.102. 103. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)104. 105. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001106. 107. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001108. 109. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)110. 111. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.112. 113. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)114. 115. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001116. 117. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001118. 119. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)120. 121. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.122. 123. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)124. 125. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001126. 127. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001128. 129. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=182.6148)130. 131. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.132. 133. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)134. 135. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001136. 137. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001138. 139. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)140. 141. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.142. 143. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)144. 145. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001146. 147. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001148. 149. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)150. 151. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.152. 153. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)154. 155. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001156. 157. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001158. 159. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=182.6148)160. 161. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.162. 163. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)164. 165. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001166. 167. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001168. 169. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)170. 171. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.172. 173. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)174. 175. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001176. 177. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001178. 179. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=182.6148)180. 181. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.182. 183. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)184. 185. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001186. 187. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001188. 189. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)190. 191. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.192. 193. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)194. 195. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001196. 197. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001198. 199. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=1.8446)200. 201. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.202. 203. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)204. 205. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001206. 207. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001208. 209. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=1.8446)210. 211. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.212. 213. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)214. 215. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001216. 217. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_3 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001218. 219. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)220. 221. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.222. 223. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)224. 225. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001226. 227. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_3 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001228. 229. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=1.8446)230. 231. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.232. 233. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)234. 235. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001236. 237. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_006_GLZP_3 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001238. 239. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=92.2297)240. 241. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.242. 243. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)244. 245. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001246. 247. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001248. 249. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)250. 251. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.252. 253. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)254. 255. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001256. 257. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001258. 259. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)260. 261. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.262. 263. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)264. 265. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001266. 267. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001268. 269. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)270. 271. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.272. 273. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)274. 275. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001276. 277. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001278. 279. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)280. 281. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.282. 283. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)284. 285. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001286. 287. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_001_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001288. 289. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)290. 291. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.292. 293. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)294. 295. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001296. 297. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_001_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001298. 299. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)300. 301. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.302. 303. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)304. 305. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001306. 307. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_001_GLZP_1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001308. 309. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)310. 311. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.312. 313. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)314. 315. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001316. 317. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_001_GLZP_2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001318. 319. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)320. 321. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.322. 323. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)324. 325. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001326. 327. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_OVEST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001328. 329. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)330. 331. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.332. 333. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)334. 335. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001336. 337. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_OVEST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001338. 339. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)340. 341. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.342. 343. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)344. 345. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001346. 347. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_002_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001348. 349. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)350. 351. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.352. 353. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)354. 355. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001356. 357. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_002_GLZP_0 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001358. 359. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)360. 361. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.362. 363. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)364. 365. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001366. 367. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_002_GLZP_1 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001368. 369. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)370. 371. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.372. 373. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)374. 375. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001376. 377. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_002_GLZP_2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001378. 379. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=180.7210)380. 381. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.382. 383. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)384. 385. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001386. 387. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_SOTTO is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001388. 389. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)390. 391. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.392. 393. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)394. 395. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001396. 397. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_SOTTO is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001398. 399. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)400. 401. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.402. 403. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)404. 405. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001406. 407. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 7 of back surface=PELLE_SOTTO is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001408. 409. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)410. 411. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.412. 413. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)414. 415. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001416. 417. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 8 of back surface=PELLE_SOTTO is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001418. 419. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)420. 421. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.422. 423. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)424. 425. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001426. 427. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_SOPRA_DUP is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001428. 429. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)430. 431. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.432. 433. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)434. 435. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001436. 437. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_SOPRA_DUP is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001438. 439. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)440. 441. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.442. 443. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)444. 445. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001446. 447. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 5 of back surface=PELLE_SOPRA_DUP is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001448. 449. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)450. 451. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.452. 453. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)454. 455. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001456. 457. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 8 of back surface=PELLE_SOPRA_DUP is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001458. 459. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=184.4593)460. 461. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.462. 463. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)464. 465. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001466. 467. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002468. 469. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)470. 471. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.472. 473. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)474. 475. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001476. 477. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002478. 479. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)480. 481. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.482. 483. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)484. 485. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001486. 487. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002488. 489. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)490. 491. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.492. 493. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)494. 495. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001496. 497. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_NORD2 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002498. 499. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)500. 501. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.502. 503. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)504. 505. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001506. 507. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002508. 509. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)510. 511. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.512. 513. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)514. 515. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001516. 517. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE001 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002518. 519. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)520. 521. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.522. 523. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)524. 525. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001526. 527. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=WIN_005 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002528. 529. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=32.0568)530. 531. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.532. 533. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)534. 535. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001536. 537. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=WIN_005 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002538. 539. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=139.1556)540. 541. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.542. 543. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)544. 545. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001546. 547. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=WIN_005 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002548. 549. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=139.1556)550. 551. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.552. 553. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)554. 555. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001556. 557. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=WIN_005 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002558. 559. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=32.0568)560. 561. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.562. 563. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)564. 565. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001566. 567. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002568. 569. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)570. 571. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.572. 573. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)574. 575. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001576. 577. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002578. 579. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)580. 581. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.582. 583. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)584. 585. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001586. 587. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002588. 589. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)590. 591. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.592. 593. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)594. 595. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001596. 597. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE003 is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002598. 599. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=167.5695)600. 601. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.602. 603. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)604. 605. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001606. 607. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 1 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002608. 609. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)610. 611. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.612. 613. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)614. 615. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001616. 617. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 2 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002618. 619. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)620. 621. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.622. 623. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)624. 625. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001626. 627. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 3 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002628. 629. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)630. 631. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.632. 633. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)634. 635. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001636. 637. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 4 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002638. 639. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)640. 641. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.642. 643. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)644. 645. ** ~~~ ** Solar Distribution = FullInteriorExterior will not work in Zone=001646. 647. ** ~~~ ** because vertex 5 of back surface=PELLE_EST is in front of receiving surface=PELLE_COMUNIONE002648. 649. ** ~~~ ** (Dot Product indicator=195.1092)650. 651. ** ~~~ ** Check surface geometry; if OK, use Solar Distribution = FullExterior instead.652. 653. ** Severe ** Problem in interior solar distribution calculation (CHKBKS)654. [...]
thisthe errorthat appen when i lunch E+ with only one zone....what is going on???? …
perienced with grasshopper, but so far I've managed to combine the following:
Giulio Piacentino's "Catenary arch from height" script
Pirouz Nourian's "Mobius" script (Obtained from a friend)
End Result:
Here's where I'm stuck: I want the mobius twist to revolve around the midpoint of the arch, but the script uses the input values to determine the endpoints, resulting in a weird sinuous shape when viewed from above. Also, the secondary end points (generated by the mobius script, determining the width of the surface) are generated by default along the z axis, resulting in an arch that only touches the "ground" at two points. I attempted to work around this issue by trying to force the zHeight parameter to correspond with the y axis (thus rotating the arch 90 degrees so it would lay "flat"), but the script interprets the third point as a value and not as an actual point to bisect. I thought this might be an issue with the C# component that I obtained from Giulio Piacentino's script, so I attempted to tinker around with the source code. Unfortunately, I'm not fluent in C# so I only managed to mess everything up (I've since recovered the code from the cache). Anybody got some ideas? -BC …
TB of RAM. I think I'm going to start a GoFundMe campaign to buy one for myself :)
2- The server's cost is about $13 an hour. I get free access to supercomputer through my university and xsede.org because I earned an NSF Honorable mention last March, however, the supercomputers available through both resources are a little complicated for me to use, as opposed to the one available from amazon that has Microsoft server 2012 already installed.
3- I wanted to run 400 annual glare simulations for 400 different views.
4- I tried a to perform annual glare simulation for one view on my Dell XPS that has Intel Core i7-6700HQ processor and 16GB of system memory. The simulation took 2 hours to complete. Radiance parameter ab was set to 6.
5- I wanted to obtain the batch file for each view so I can run them on the server. So I used the fly component to run all 400 simulations and closed the cmd windows, that wasn't bad ( for me at least) because I asked my son to this job for me, he was just glad to help me :)
6- I created one batch file using this cmd command:
dir /s /b *.bat > runall.bat
This created a file with the path to each .bat file. I edited this file in Notepad++ to include the word "start" at the beginning of each line. This was done using the "find and replace" dialogue box.
7- I split my newly created batch file into 3 batch files, each one has about 130 file names and " start" before the file names.
8- installed radiance on my server
9- Ran the first batch file on the server, this started 130 cmd windows performing my simulations, CPU usage was anywhere between 90% to 100% and about 105 GB of RAMs were used.
10. It took about 5 hours to complete all 130 simulations, I expected to run all in 2 hours but can't complain because this would've taken about 260 hours to run on my laptop. After the simulations done I ran the second and then the third batch files ( total of about 15 hours).
11. I got 400 valid dgb files. Couldn't be happier!
…