omponent that increases in the x-axis (example below).
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 etc...B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 etc...C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 etc...D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 etc...
This is as far as I've gotten:
I have collected my points on the grid into a "List Length" component and input that into a "Series" which input into a "Function" with the expression Format("A{0}",x). The result labeling resembles the example below.
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 etc...
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.…
nt to multiply the number of items in the list A, so at the end I will end up with the same number of elements in each lists.
e.g. (for branch 1 in list A I want to have two times the same curve, and the same for the branch 2 and so on )
List A (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=1
{2} N=1
{3} N=1...
List B (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=2
{2} N=2
{3} N=1...
NEW List A (Data with 88 branches)
{0} N=1
{1} N=2
{2} N=2
{3} N=1...
Any suggestions about how to do this?
Thank you,
Martha
…
Hi Joseph,
have you tried unifying the sequence of pictures with something like http://www.virtualdub.org/, and then loading the sequence in AE?
- Giulio
______________giulio@mcneel.comMcNeel Europe
GH) > then define (still in GH) some instance definition (or many: case variants) > then place it according some "policy" (3d point grid and the likes). Note: Only doable with code, mind (C# in my case).
Obviously you can skip the creation part and instruct GH to deal with instance definitions already listed in the Block Manager (say: find the block named "cell666_B3" blah, blah) ... but that means that you can only use them (meaning a rather "limited" parametric approach) and not make them from scratch (meaning a true parametric approach).
But I guess that you've tried the block way in the Rhino environment already. That said I use rather solely this approach in GH and yields quite manageable object collections - I would say "real-time" response (up to 20K instances) but I use dedicated Xeon E5 1630 V3 workstations (with NVida Quadros K4200 and up for the graphic response part of the equation) so the "performance" is rather a subjective thing.
Modifications:
easily doable with GH (on instance definitions at placing time: since you need only to scale them and not vary their topology).
Anyway post a portion of the R file.…