n en el diseño y fabricación digital de formas complejas y euclidianas.
Tomando como plataforma Grasshopper con RHINO, se explora y optimiza el diseño y fabricación de topologías complejas bajo los entornos de "Grasshopper", "RhinoNest" y "RhinoCAM" así como la parte de renderizado tipo high-end con Brazil.
D-O-F De 8:00 AM a 12:00 PM y de 1:00 PM a 5:00 PM
Contenidos:
1. Modelado Avanzado y sus Tecnicas. Aplanado y Desarrollo de Superficies.Anidado y distribución Nesting.
2. Introducción al Diseño Paramétrico.Definiciones Avanzadas de Grasshopper,posibilidades y limitaciones. Ajustes de escala para impresión y corte.
3. Introducción a la Manufactura en CNC - RhinoCAM 2.0.
4. Guía Paso a Paso para la realización de un Renderizado usando Brazil 2.0. Presentación DIGITAL de proyectos.
Docentes:
Andrés González - CEO McNeel Miami
Ovidio Cardona - Especialista en RhinoCAM y Zebra
Juan David Moreno - Especialista en Rhino y Brazil
Inversión:
$650 000 (Incluye licencia Educativa y Certificación de McNeel)
$550 000 ( Incluye Certificación de McNeel)
Informes:
Bits LTDA Tel: 412 30 15
Laboratorio de Imagen Facultad de Arquitectura Tel: 430 94 32…
starting mesh. The geometry of the lines is then modified, through the formfinding routine.
In my second vb component, I need to build an array with 4 columns. Each row represent one face of the mesh (row 0 for face 0, row1 for face 1, ...) and each column represent the number of the edge element. If ABCD is the quad face, column 0 is the number of the edge AB, column 1 is BC, column 2 is CD and column 3 is DA.
So to build this array, I extract the edges of each face with FaceB component then Explode component, and I build the array by comparing each line coming from this to each line coming from MEdges component, with a 2 level nested loop. Here is where I am looking for an efficient way to compare 2 lines...
Is there an easier and faster way to build this array ?…
similar to any other surface in your model. Just model the shadings as surfaces and then assign either translucent material or transparent material (glass) to them and connect them to runDaylight with other Honeybee objects. Is that make sense?
Make sure to use appropriate numbers for -ab, -ad and -aa. Check page 27 of Daysim tutorial for a an example for parameters (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16228160/Daysim3.0.Tutorial.pdf). I should add that the numbers are slightly high in the example though. Here is another reference if you want to know more about RAD parameters: http://www.radiance-online.org/community/workshops/2011-berkeley-ca/presentations/day1/JM_AmbientCalculation.pdf
Mostapha
…
you can open the studyFolder (it's one of the outputs of run daylight analysis component.) and check *.bat files. There is a rpict or rtrace line that you can see all the parameters listed. Mine is:
rpict -i -t 10 -vtv -vp 43.111 -74.673 49.782 -vd -0.433 0.750 -0.500 -vu 0.000 0.000 1.000 -vh 54.328 -vv 26.991 -vs 0.000 -vl 0.000 -x 64 -y 64 -af unnamed_IMG.amb -ps 8 -pt 0.15 -pj 0.6 -dj 0 -ds 0.5 -dt 0.5 -dc 0.25 -dr 0 -dp 64 -st 0.85 -ab 2 -ad 20 -as 128 -ar 16 -aa 0.001 -lr 4 -lw 0.050 -av 0 0 0 unnamed_IMG.oct > unnamed_IMG.unf
aa and ad values are changed in this example.
Mostapha
…
ace, the resulting surface does not exactly follow the curve. At the protruding edges, the surface falls out of the curve. Whereas at the edges which are going in, the surface forms is a curve of degree-1 i.e. not a smooth curve but lines.
What i want to know is, is this a normal thing in GH? when i have to print, will it print like a proper curve?
Also, at the moment, i have joined all curves together and connected it to surface component to get a surface. If there is any better way, please advise me.
I have attached the design representation and also part of my GH definition.
Any advise will be highly appreciated.
cheers
aB…