What I figured yesterday is that the increase in radiation because of the reflective facade for the 'worst' month is only about 2-3 kWh/m2 as your looking at a value of 80 without and 82-83 kWh/m2 with reflection.
So my assumption is that the glare factor will play a much bigger role instead of intensity of the sun, looking at comfortable levels. So I'm looking in this as well. It's very cool to play around with these plugins and see the outcome. I'll keep you guys posted.
@ Claudio, that was exactly my problem as well. I presented a direct sunlight hour analysis, to show the increase in direct sunlight hours because of the mirrored facade and at what times of the day the reflections occurred. But it is hard to asses if this is 'bad' or 'good'. The restaurant in question receives more or less 130 direct sunlight hours 'naturally' in the worst month and because of the reflection the result was 161 direct sunlight hours, but the client was like okay..... and is this a problem? So we decided to look at sun intensity but I didn't want to fall into the trap of in the end presenting kWh/m2 and having the same problem not knowing if this is 'comfortable' or 'annoying' etc. Good luck with your study, I'll post my findings
Thanks again guys…
.
I think i'm about 80% there. It may not be the most elegant procedure, but it appears to be working. I am having some slight problems.
1. I'm having trouble extracting the edge curve on one side of my mesh
a. I used a mesh plane intersection to trim my site mesh, and the resultant curve extends beyond the limit of my mesh
b. I identified the intersection point, but GH is not shattering on that intersection point. instead it happens at a point further down the polyline
2. I'm can't join my curves. If i bake them, they join into a closed curve.... GH join curves is not behaving. i've had some success joining two segments, but i can seem to get all 4 side wall curves to join.
if anybody could offer some advice, i'd be very appreciative. also, i'd like some recommendations for ways to streamline this definition. I'm sure that there are more creative ways to manage this data, and i'd love to about them. thanks - CSDG
…
use an attractor curve to adjust curves that are being lofted to create a "wavey" surface. I've attached a picture to show the end result. Right now i create all the curves and then loft them together to create a surface which could then have a rib definition applied to it, and it works, my problem is that this project is for a 80' section of wall with ribs that would be a few inches apart, so that is a ton of curves i have to change everytime i want to adjust the overall shape. So is it possible to have an attractor curve that instead of adjusting the spacing of shapes in plane with the curve, would create high points or low points perpendicular to the curve? Hopefully that makes some sense, i'm having trouble finding the words to explain it, the attached pictures should help.
Any advice on how to do this would be great. I hate being that guy but this project came up last minute and it seemed like something the Grasshopper help save a ton of time in as far as adjustments go.
Thanks,
Kyle
…
h kangaroo and have found one project that illustrates my idea exactly...
https://vimeo.com/88002087
So far my best attempt has been to use a gridded surface in which the lines of the grid are springs, with a rest length at 80% of their initial length. (call this grid A) This is to simulate as if the material has been stretched 120% of its resting dimensions.
I have been trying to anchor the springs to a secondary grid (Grid B, curves that will be deposited onto the material) at the points of intersection with grid A.
I am not sure if this is the best approach, maybe soapfilm would be better? although i require the boundary (grid B) to adapt also...
Any advice or attempts to explain how Taichi Kuma has done this in his video would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks…
A: Who created it? / Copyright?
B: Anyone have a larger resolution copy of this image (or a vector so I can do a large resize).
Long and short - I'm an artist and I'd like to make a quilt out of that image. I need a decent resolution copy of it so I can do a huge resize and get a 76" x 80" crop out of it. I've tried resizing it in Photoshop, but by the time it's large enough, the quality has dropped below what is usable for my needs.
Thanks in advance! I totally understand I'm relying on the kindness of strangers here. (Also if this is inappropriate to post - please delete. Thank you)
Michael…
e section which wont recompute with owner.expiresolution(true). Am I missing something ? I cannot declare buttons and form and all that stuff in run script, cause it doesnt accept withevents property. My idea is to recompute all the script component stuff...
This is my code :
Private Sub RunScript(ByVal x As Object, ByVal y As Object, ByRef A As Object)
If x = True Then frm.Controls.Add(b1) t1.location = p0 frm.Controls.add(t1) frm.show a = zmienna Else frm.Dispose End If
End Sub
'<Custom additional code> Dim frm As New system.windows.Forms.Form WithEvents b1 As New system.Windows.Forms.Button WithEvents t1 As New system.Windows.Forms.TextBox Dim p0 As New system.Drawing.Point(30, 30) Dim zmienna As String
Private Sub b1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles b1.click
zmienna = t1.Text owner.ExpireSolution(True)
End Sub
…
(1) I have been exporting small sections of a larger model into Maya from Rhino as FBX. In Maya I rotate and scale the models (-90 in X, Scale XYZ 0.001). The Named Views are being saved, but do not have a successful import into the Maya model. They do not appear as in Rhino, and the problem is not solved by scaling or rotating the cameras.
(2) If I try going the other direction, the cameras exported from Maya as FBX are also not aligning with the model in Rhino as they are in Maya.. I will do my best to post some images of the problem and hope you can help.
error !!
This is what the named views look like
here I am trying to the other way with a good view from Maya
strange placement..
This is the best result I can achieve, after I scale the camera by 1000
Any Advice???
Thanks, Robert.
…
ysim.ning.com/
When you run the simualtion you will notice on the batch terminal that Daysim is also being called, so you may want to consider how Daysim uses Radiance files & data.
Regarding your current problem, I think you stumbled onto something weird and interesting.
Interior and exterior readings appear to differ by 40 in the best case scenarios. Even setting the transmittance to 1 yields similar results. I tried changing from cummulative sky to climate sky and got similar values. Changing the test points did nothing either.
I think, (yet I'm too lazy to prove this) that the difference in values stems from diffuse radiation over the sky dome.
If you delete everything except the glass you'll notice that interior values are like 80-90% of the exterior values (this seems like the expected behaviour with a transmittance of 1). So, if we consider that a vertical window, part of an opaque box, is receiving radiation from 25% of a sphere, as you start to inset the interior test points the radiation they receive will be a fraction of the 25%.
Let me try to explain this better...The exterior surface receives radiation from a section of a sphere calculated by 180degrees on the xy plane (let’s call this angle theta) and by 90degrees (let’s call this angle phi) in azimuthal elevation. If you integrate this over spherical coordinates (theta from 0 to pi; phi from 0 to pi/2) you will find that it comes to a quarter of a sphere. By comparison, the interior surface will not integrate theta from 0 to 180degrees,nor phi from 0 to 90degrees, instead it will be the subtended angle from the exterior surface as a function of their separation; the farther in you go the smaller the view of the outside.
If my hypothesis is correct there shouldn't be that much difference since the separation is only 10cms...the subtended angle would be like 170 instead of 180 for theta and 85 instead of 90 for phi...overall if you integrate both spherical areas there should only by a difference of 10%.
In conclusion, I believe the unexpected behaviour stems from the previous subtended angle thing. If direct radiation was the only factor the difference would be the aforementioned 10%, which suggests that an additional source of energy is also affected by this. Perhaps indirect and diffuse radiation from other areas of the sky dome.
I’m definitely intrigued on why this is happening. Please post if you figure it out.
Regards,
Mauricio
…
TB of RAM. I think I'm going to start a GoFundMe campaign to buy one for myself :)
2- The server's cost is about $13 an hour. I get free access to supercomputer through my university and xsede.org because I earned an NSF Honorable mention last March, however, the supercomputers available through both resources are a little complicated for me to use, as opposed to the one available from amazon that has Microsoft server 2012 already installed.
3- I wanted to run 400 annual glare simulations for 400 different views.
4- I tried a to perform annual glare simulation for one view on my Dell XPS that has Intel Core i7-6700HQ processor and 16GB of system memory. The simulation took 2 hours to complete. Radiance parameter ab was set to 6.
5- I wanted to obtain the batch file for each view so I can run them on the server. So I used the fly component to run all 400 simulations and closed the cmd windows, that wasn't bad ( for me at least) because I asked my son to this job for me, he was just glad to help me :)
6- I created one batch file using this cmd command:
dir /s /b *.bat > runall.bat
This created a file with the path to each .bat file. I edited this file in Notepad++ to include the word "start" at the beginning of each line. This was done using the "find and replace" dialogue box.
7- I split my newly created batch file into 3 batch files, each one has about 130 file names and " start" before the file names.
8- installed radiance on my server
9- Ran the first batch file on the server, this started 130 cmd windows performing my simulations, CPU usage was anywhere between 90% to 100% and about 105 GB of RAMs were used.
10. It took about 5 hours to complete all 130 simulations, I expected to run all in 2 hours but can't complain because this would've taken about 260 hours to run on my laptop. After the simulations done I ran the second and then the third batch files ( total of about 15 hours).
11. I got 400 valid dgb files. Couldn't be happier!
…
he time to work with it.
the project is about facade strips which turns along height. the top angle is
parallel to the facade and the bottom is max. 90 degrees twisted, but the strips
should turn diffrently to achieve more dinamic look.
first i have tried to achieve this by calculating distance between the rotation angle from points of the grid and a single point.
then i have tried to ad some more effecting points and used the distance to the divided surface (the circles are just to control the area of effection):
i manually lofted it.
the result is a bit annoying becouse the points that effect the angle are always visible:
i have triend to solve this by drawing a line and divided it to recieve points along the bottom of the geometry. the result is not working properly:
Anyway,
there must be a better/smoother way to achieve this. i would like to effect the twist of the surfaces by distance to a spline, but im just lost. can you help me please?
the problems im encountering:
0- distance spline to grid to effect the angle
1- list of x/y coordinates and angle of rotation for each point of the grid
2- export points to excel
3- lofting lines in one direction only (x1, x2, x3...)
4- reduce the list data to 2 decimal (0,00)
5- maybe angle from radian to degrees
thx…