the algorithm is unstable and not optimal. Unlikely to be able to somehow use it or learn something on it)
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/2x15zic85gsbfwb/%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0%20100.3dm?dl=1
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/a2avwghhdmb5tv1/%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0%20100.gh?dl=1…
represent the list rearrangement. It would also be great for this to accommodate variable list lengths because the u/v gridlines on the original surface are tbd
…
, a1200)}) Is there any way I can make this list into {a1, a2, a3, a4, -a5, -a6, -a7, -a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, -a13, ..... , a1200} ? ( 4 positive signs then 4 negative signs and so on) - alternating every nth in general.
or
2. Is there any way (workaround) to get negative angle value from 2 vectors? I know 'ANGLE (of 2 vectors)' component by itself doesn't work and I know why too. I have feeling that the reflex angle output might be useful but again, matter of list manipulation.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Hyo
…