alità di Rhino, tra cui i comandi più avanzati per la creazione di superfici.
Struttura Le lezioni tratteranno in maniera sistematica argomenti riguardanti l'interfaccia utente, i comandi, la creazione e modifica di curve, superfici e solidi.
Risultati attesi Dopo questo corso lo studente dovrebbe essere in grado di: • Muoversi comodamente attraverso l’interfaccia di Rhino. • Identificare quando è richiesto modellare in maniera free-form o di precisione. • Creare e modificare curve, superfici e solidi. • Utilizzare ausili di modellazione per la precisione. • Produzione di semplici rendering per la visualizzazione dei modelli di Rhino.
Destinatari Questo corso è rivolto a progettisti e studenti che vogliono imparare in modo efficace i concetti e le caratteristiche del software di modellazione Rhinoceros. Le lezioni saranno ottimizzate ed esposte da un docente ART qualificato dalla McNeel. Alla fine del corso verrà rilasciata l’attestato di partecipazione ad un corso qualificato McNeel.
Prerequisiti Per affrontare il corso sono richieste competenze di Windows, passione e volontà di modellazione; precedenti esperienze di modellazione, anche con altri software, sono utili ma non indispensabili.…
es, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the same problem. If I save the GH file, then try to reopen it, it always gets the error Marios shows above. The file still opens, but the Crv parameter with the internalized data is gone.
For even more fun and excitement, if I instead try to select the Crv parameter and make a cluster, it crashes all of Rhino. I sent that to McNeel with the Rhino error reporting tool, but I've also included the three files here.
I zipped all the files together; let me know if you can't access something.
Now, I'm one of those crazy Mac people, and McNeel already sent the standard "you shouldn't use Rhino in Parallels" reply, but I'm guessing this problem has nothing to do with lack of 3D acceleration. I've been working on a giant GH script and some involved Rhino files for months, in Parallels, with no problem.
More info: Before this error, I saved another script with a cluster containing an earlier version of my internalized number tags, and I can still open that script and use it. I included the 3dm and gh files for this; they are the ones named, jokingly, "elegant ..."
Between saving the "elegant" version, which worked, and the newer GH file that generates the error, there were some updates that Windows 7 installed, so I wonder if that might have something to do with it. If you want some Windows system files pertaining to this, let me know. I've included a screenshot of the latest Windows updates.
Other than the Win7 updates, I can't think of anything else that's changed. Before this error began I already had all the latest versions of Rhino 4, GH, Parallels, and Mac OS X Lion.
Thanks for all your work. I love GH. Carl Wedell
Denver, Colorado, USA…
io Arturo Degni
Il workshop introdurrà le nozioni base di Grasshopper approfondendo le metodologie della progettazione parametrica e le tecniche di modellazione algoritmica per la generazione di forme complesse. La didattica è organizzata secondo moduli che coprono gli aspetti più importanti del software e prevede lezioni frontali ed esercitazioni guidate.
Il corso è rivolto a studenti e professionisti con esperienza minima nella modellazione 3D e si articolerà in lezioni teoriche ed esercitazioni. Sarà rilasciato un attestato finale.
La nostra attività formativa nasce dalla volontà di promuovere le nuove tecnologie digitali di supporto alla progettazione e condividere il know-how maturato attraverso ricerca, realizzazioni, pubblicazioni, collaborazioni con le più importanti realta professionali ed accademiche a livello internazionale.
A>T è Authorized Rhino Trainer.
http://www.arturotedeschi.com/wordpress/?project=plug-it_grasshopper-livello-base…
a and the Middle East through its affiliate offices, is pleased to announce that the official Rhino workshop “Digital Obsession-Advances in Architectural Geometry” will take place in Damascus – Syria on August and September 2011. The workshop will cover Rhino Level 2 – NURBS Modeling-Advanced and Basic scripting. In this class participants will learn how to create and edit accurate free form 3D NURBS models. This fast-moving class covers most of Rhino’s functionality, including the most advanced surfacing commands. At the end of the workshop each participant will receive an official certificate of participation from McNeel Europe (Barcelona – Spain) and MAG LAB. The event will be the key event of the year for discussing, learning and networking about the emerging practice of digital parametric. These events follow the highly successful previous workshops, Spain 2008-2009-2010-2011, Italy 2010, Syria 2009-2010-2011 and multiple preceding events. The Workshop applications are online and close on 14August.2011, provides a unique opportunity to work with the most established expert software in the world on digital parametric design. The most successful Workshop attendees will have their work shown at the AIU 2011 Conference and workshops, will also have an opportunity to be invited and attend next workshops held by MAG LAB where top architects, engineers and educators will participate.
…
Added by Aref Maksoud at 1:41am on September 15, 2011
us pouvons visualiser chaque objet déplier:
Ici l'objet 2...
Mais bien sur cela fonctionne pour tous....
Je joins la définition grasshopper si besoin...
…
nd give it love.2. Everything else is to know the nature of the data and components. Data is all: numbers, formulas, colors, lists, branches, graphics, visual representation, connection between data, hierarchies, etc.3. Work, work and work.Have information is know about data, have knowledge is to know how the data is related with everything else and have wisdom is to have the right mental-programs to process data. And then there's the creativity, divergent thinking, ingenuity and talent that make the mental architecture not be something rigid. Then, to carry out algorithms, the mindset I usually follow is, I start with data/parameters to perform a design, and decompose the process into smaller processes that can manipulate. If I'm at a point where I do not know how to do, two things can happen, that I know what I have to do but can not, or not know how to do, the first is probably lack of knowledge aboud data or components, therefore, it is time to learn; and second, rethink the previous processes if I can avoid the problem, which often leads me to redo the whole algorithm, which is not allways bad.In short, delves into the data and components, so your mental program of execution will be more optimal if you know more about posibilities. And think in terms of process, not in terms of outcome. And work, work, work does the rest. There is no trick, just eager to learn. I did not start to understand that it was really the 3d until I began to learn programming, but this way I will advise you when you have confidence using grasshopper.Perhaps is not what you expected, but it all boils down to devote more hours. Grasshopper is easy to use and hard to learn.…
ike this, and more specifically about Lofted geometry, is that if you give the Loft function a bunch of complex curves to match the edges of, the resulting Loft surface does not always match the curves used to make the surface. If you have 2 Loft surfaces that meet at the same curve (for instance, when picking the top curve of an inside and outside Loft surface to make a closed lip), the connection between them will have tiny gaps in various places. I attribute this to truncation and/or roundoff errors in calculating the Lofted surfaces.
However, it seems that using the Cap function actually eliminates this problem by turning an open Brep Loft into a closed/solid one. Of course I have no idea why this happens, but it does eliminate naked edges, edge gaps, and any other weirdness associated with joining Loft surfaces.
Before discovering this method I spent about a week trying all the suggestion you mentioned. None of them worked. All of the Join functions failed, different meshing parameters had no effect, and Mesh Smooth and Weld did not help either.
In pretty much all of these cases the 3D Builder app that I use for fixing/simplifying STL files exported from Rhino would run for a very long time, forever, or add artifacts (like a closed top) that rendered the part unprintable.
I have changed my GH layout to incorporate the Cap/SDiff functions now, but if you' like a 3DM file that uses the previous method I can certainly go back and create one for you.
…
Added by Birk Binnard at 9:35am on September 14, 2016
ithin an Urban context and taking into account the shading of the surrounding context, and we are testing the Ladybug Thermal Comfort Indices component. For what we understand there are two ways to take into account the Mean Radiant Temperature, you can either plug the meanRadiantTemperature_ or the solarRadiationPerHour_. According to the meanRadiantTemperature_ description it seems that if we are doing the calculation outside in the sun we mustn’t plug in anything and we must work only with the solarRadiationPerHour_ (as you also do in the example). Is it correct?
solarRadiationPerHour_ can be calculated in two ways, the first one is shown in your example and uses Ladybug_Radiation analysis component (Very clear thank you so much! : ) ) The other one uses the Ladybug_Sunpath Shading component and from the description is supposed to be more precise. And here are the other questions:
1) there is a parameter that takes into account vegetation, with which degree of detail should it be represented? 2D(silhouette) or 3D surface? Should we separate the trunk from the crown?
2) In this component we can also insert an albedo value. Is this value taken into account in the PET calculation and if yes, how?
3) In the Ladybug_Radiation Analysis component we can input a geometry at the ground level to be calculated and then place an analysis grid at 1.1 _disFromBase. Using Ladybug_Sunpath Shading, where should we place the geometry to be calculated and how can we place the analysis grid like in the other case?
We apologise for the long post!
Thank you very much for all your efforts!!…
d as a mask). By inputting the # of grid points in the Y direction, it calculates # of grid points in the X direction, trying to create as close as possible a square grid division.
Hovering over the surfaces are 2 curves. By calculating the distance between the curves' points and grid points, an attractor pattern is created.
The source object is scaled based on the attractor curves, flipped upside down and adapted to the surface normal. Finally a solid difference is applied resulting in the indented surface pattern.
(Also, there is some more detailed input regarding object size, rotation and location.)
While running this on a machine with enough processing power to fly me to Mars, Grasshopper still becomes really slow and unresponsive ever since I've added the sDiff component. The same goes for utilizing the Trim component instead of the sDiff (I assume they do the same in this scenario?).
Am I missing something here? Is it somehow calculating large amounts of unnecessary data? Am I doing things overly-complex?
Attached the Rhino & Grasshopper files. Please play with the "# Objects in Y direction" slider, to (hopefully) experience what I mean. I am looking at a preferred # Object in the Y direction upwards of 50 at least. Changing the "3D Object" BRep to something else (in the hidden layers) might also influence performance.
So, what do you guys think?…
Added by Pete Bell at 10:34am on September 24, 2012