Ruby, [9] R, [10] PHP ,[11] MATLAB [12]
Maybe it can find it's way into GH somehow..
when using the default GH random number generator i mostly use much higher seed values.…
Added by Robert Vier at 10:08am on December 27, 2012
and diffuse radiation for 365 days at noon (12:30)
As you can see there are some bumps that I have discarded as dependant of geometry (Did simulations with different geometries even with just an horizontal surface to analyse and nothing else.) Also discarded from the solar position since the bumps happen in different days as you may see in the graph. I have also tested it with Diva and honeybee so I guess it has to be with RADIANCE. I got this data reading the illuminance files from an annual daylight simulation.
I guess it has something to be with how RADIANCE transform radiation to luminance (luminance = (RED*.263 + GREEN*.655 + BLUE*.082) * 179) And how it determines the values Red, green and blue of the spectrum for a determined solar radiation. I guess, because I was unable to learn how RADIANCE calculates this spectrum, that it has to be dependant of the radiation and solar position with a quite large difference of spectrum.
Normally this bumps are hiden behing the variation of radiation over the year, and I guess that the tool was not designed to have such unrealistic constant radiation, but I would like to know why this happens.
Can anyone help? Any clue is welcome!
Thank you.
…
opening a simple file with 30 curves being lofted took like 2 minutes to complete and Rhino crashed afterwards saying:"Windows is out of memory and Rhino will close after you click ok."evethough I still had 7GB of free physical memory and my page file is set also to 16 GB just to be shure...I then switched to Rhino 5.0 Version 5 SR14 64-bit (5.14.522.8390, 05/22/2017) which also had big problems to display the lofted surface. It was unresponsive after loading the file for a minute and a half and then it normally displayed the lofted surface. Every move of camera takes at least 10 seconds to update, but at least it runs. GH profiler says the loft took only 12 ms (90%).
So I'm suspected my graphics card, because the Windows are just three weeks from a clean install. I've also updated my Graphics Driver from the stock Windows one to Intel HD one, but nothing changed.Is there something I'm missing??? What can I try next?My specs:CPU: i5-3320M @ 2.60 GHzRAM: 16 GBGPU: Intel HD Graphics 4000, driver: 07.04. 2017, version 10.18.10.4653
…
Added by Šimon Prokop at 10:39am on October 21, 2017
Andrews, a professor/artist at Northeastern University whom I had the abolsule pleasure to collaborate with on this project. I was in my Senior Year in the last semester when the project started. It was a wonderful apportunity to take a part in such a project. I want to thank the Grasshopper Community because without this forums, I would have never been able to complete this project. I had self taught my self Grasshopper after attending a two days intensive workshop at ModeLab in NYC and since then, I always came back here to learn or post a question. I never had a mentor or someone to teach me Grasshopper except for this forums, so thank you for always answering my questions regarding any scripts I post and thank you for being a wonderful community. I would love to also thank Ed Andrews for giving me the apportunity to work on my first Parametric Project when I was a biggener at Grasshopper and for trusting/having faith that I can do it. It was an extreme challange to work on such a project as a biggener in Grasshopper, but it was a wonderful experince. The project had total two different scripts. One was a slicing script that takes a form and slices it, creates the connections, and flattens it. The other was for patterning, creating all the offsets needed, engraving lines and cutting lines.
The form was fully built by Ed Andrews. It has developed further more with another collaboration to integrating lighting that behave and changes depending on wind speed and tempreture.
If you want to check the real pictures/video of the end sculpture, you can find it on
http://www.ed-andrews.com/rook-2/
Rook has also made it to the 12 finalist for 6th Zahner Biennial Competition
http://blog.azahner.com/2015/01/02/finalists-announced-for-the-6th-zahner-biennial-competition/
I hope you like it.…
comerciales. Rhino permite comunicar ideas en el desarrollo, investigación, manufactura, marketing y proceso de construcción de un producto o espacio, antes de ser construido y genera documentos constructivos para la elaboración de los mismos. Permite exportar los archivos a las extensiones comerciales más utilizadas en la industria como DXF, DWG, Illustrator y 3ds entre muchos otros. La gran cantidad de extensiones suplen las necesidades especificas para arquitectura, diseño de producto, calzado, joyería, ingeniería, manufactura y visualización fotorealista.
Grasshopper es una extensión de Rhino que permite el modelado paramétrico sin tener conocimientos de programación o matemáticas avanzadas, facilitando el desarrollo de modelos de alta complejidad a partir de formas simples o complejas.
Dimension
Del 12 Septiembre al 14 de Octubre de 2011
Sesiones: 15 de 3 hrs
Duración: 45 horas
Días: lunes, miércoles y viernes
Horario: de 19:00 hrs a 22:00 hrs
Costo:
Pago único: $4,000 (antes del inicio del taller)
Pago fraccionado: $4,500
Primer pago: $2,000 para reservar tu lugar.
Segundo pago: $1,250 - 26 de septiembre
Tercer pago: $1,250 - 3 de octubre
Es necesario traer Laptop Propia
En caso de requerir factura se cobrará el i.v.a.
…
NOW > https://designbydata.org/apply/
Design by Data provides attendees with a cross-disciplinary culture of computational design and a comprehensive knowledge of cutting-edge technologies in the fields of parametric architecture, robotics, digital manufacturing and 3D printing for the construction industry.
The program is run by the prestigious École des Ponts ParisTech and designed for a selected group of architects, engineers and designers offering a variety of courses, fabrication and prototyping workshops, conferences, digital talks and networking events.
The program is a 12 month Executive part-time course (one week per month) including 350 hours of teaching plus a one-year research project. Besides the one week per month teaching courses, candidates can both keep their professional activities or develop their research and projects using the coworking and fablab facilities of the school - a full-time membership to access the digital fabrication resources of the school is included in the program fee.
For details and applications please visit >https://designbydata.org/
…
hole new realm?
This FORM FINDING WITH KANGAROO PHYSICS WEBINAR will provide you with the necessary knowledge and ability to use Kangaroo Physics, a free powerful plugin in Grasshopper / Rhinoceros.
Webinar prerequisite: Participants are advised to have a basic knowledge in Grasshopper.
Webinar duration: 6 Days / 12 hours in total: Start 22.08.2022
TIME ZONE: CET
WEBINAR Language: ENGLISH
Kindly reserve your Tickets here:
https://billetto.eu/en/e/form-finding-with-kangaroo-physics-webinar-tickets-661472
WEBINAR LINK:
WEBINAR invitation link will be sent to all participants after registration via private Email
WEBINAR FORMAT:
The webinar's format is hybrid, with live introduction, Q&As and in-class questions, with the main lessons being recorded.This optimal structure has been reached to make sure that all webinar materials are covered within the time frame given and for your benefit, in case you had to miss any parts of the webinar.
If you miss parts of the webinar for any reason (work obligations, sickness, different time zone, other urgent matters), please let the webinar instructor know in order to run the missed parts on other times that suit you.
If you have a different time zone or the webinar time doesn't suit your schedule, please let the instructor know beforehand in order to run the webinar on other times that suit you.…
ing with the shade benefit evaluator tool, trying to determine the general shape of horizontal outdoor shades in various places of a waterfront.
I have noticed that although the tool seems to suggest correct shading forms, the numerical results (degree-days per sq.m.) are not easily comparable between different cases and this may cause misinterpretations. I did a few experiments using the Hydra example and examined only the shade helpfulness to make things less complicated.
While keeping all grasshopper parameters the same (including grid size = 1m) I changed the geometry of the potential shade and the area to be shaded. It can be observed that as the examined area becomes larger, the relative contribution of each shading patch becomes less significant. This is expected since the method calculates the percentage of the sun blocked as the component description states. Yet, the comparison of the calculated metric (degree-days/sq m) can easily lead to the assumption that the larger shade is less efficient than the smaller in terms of thermal comfort (1 degree-day/sq m vs 12 degree days/sq m), which is not true.
The same problem can also be observed when changing the resolution of the analysis to finer levels (e.g. 0.5m or 0.25m) while keeping geometry the same, although according to the component description, normalisation should take care of that (see fig. below).
Is this normal? Is there a work-around to this issue (e.g. a different metric or post-process procedure)? I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this.
Best Regards
Aris…
sando las nuevas tecnologías de la información en la arquitectura para la gestión del conocimiento de sistemas que desarrollen estructuras sustentables, desde los procesos de diseño generativos o algorítmicos. Donde se contempla la P.O.O. (programación orientada a objetos) como nuevo lenguaje de expresión para el arquitecto-diseñador en el siglo XXI.Los talleres están pensados para sigan un hilo conductual en el que al mismo tiempo que se enseña se investiga y experimenta. Por primera vez se contará con diversos miembros de SEED como docentes de forma presencial y por video conferencia, logrando de esta forma acercar a los especialistas que se encuentran en Europa a los asistentes de los talleres sin encarecer los costos.+info:http://www.studioseed.net/ adn-methodology/
Los talleres están dirigidos a personas que tengan o quieran conseguir un perfil alto de innovación, creatividad, flexibilidad: profesionales con actividades de dirección, gerencia, proyectistas, investigadores, así como a estudiantes a partir de 5to semestre en adelante. Cada taller abarca perfiles diversos de profesionales, mientras unos están más orientados a directivos y gerencias, otros más a proyectistas.
LOS TALLERES:FAB DIG I / ITESM – CEM / Estado de México / 20 hrs / 8 – 11 al de diciembre 2011 (En este taller no se aplican descuentos ni becas)PARAMETRIC GREEN HOUSING / Colegio de Arquitectos del estado de Jalisco (Por confirmar Sede) / Guadalajara / 20h + 5h proyecto / 30 enero 2012 al 4 de diciembre 2012FAB DIG II / ITESM – CEM / Estado de México / 30h + 5h proyecto / 8 a 12 febrero 2012TERCERA REVOLUCIÓN INDUSTRIAL: TIC`s + SOSTENIBILIDAD. Procesos y paradigmas emergentes / Querétaro / 20 hrs / 15 al 18 de febrero 2012INTRODUCCIÓN AL DISEÑO GENERATIVO / UAM-azc / DF / 8hrs / 13, 14 de enero (Costo representativo $650, máximo 40 personas, mínimo 15 personas)INTRODUCCIÓN A: SCRIPTING CON GRASSHOPPER ( Python) Y PLUGINS / Estudio SEED México / Estado de México / 30 hrs / 23, 24, 25 febrero y 1,2, 3 de marzo 2012…
Added by SEED studio at 3:30am on November 24, 2011
ll geometry.
The difference with programs like Inventor is that they are made for production, regardless of the fabrication method. I won't go into detail about that, and instead focus on the modeling process.
In this little model, the starting point actually is a bit obvious, the foundation.
The only contents in the 3dm file are 27 lines. These indicate the location of each footing, and the direction of the tilt of each column. Everything else is defined in GH with the use of numbers as input parameters.
Needless to say, instead of those lines you could obviously generate lines and control the number of columns and panels, hence establish their layout, with any algorithmic or non-algorithmic criteria you please. That marks a major difference between GH and Inventor.
You can generate geometry with Inventor via scripting/customization (beyond iLogic), with transient graphics for visual feedback similar to GH's red-default previews. However Inventor's modeling functions are not set to input and output data trees. I won't go into detail on that, but suffice to say that the data tree associativity of GH was for me the first major difference I noticed. I've used other apps with node diagram interfaces like digital fusion for non-linear video editing since the late 90's, so the canvas did not call my attention when I first started using GH.
Anyways, here's a screen capture of the foundational lines:
In the first group of components, the centerlines of the rear columns are modeled:
And the locations in elevation for connection points are set. Those elevations were just numbers I copied from Excel, but you can obviously control that any way you please. I was just trying to model this quickly.
The same was done for the rear columns:
The above, believe it or not, took me the first 5 hours to get.
Here's a screen capture of what the model and definition looked like after 4 hours, not much:
If you're interested, next post I can get into the sketching part you mentioned, which is a bit cumbersome with GH, but not really.
I wouldn't say that using GH to do this little model was cumbersome, it just needed some thinking at the beginning. You do similar initial thinking when working with a feature-based modeler.…
Added by Santiago Diaz at 12:44am on February 24, 2011