Search Results - 📍 trx兑换到usdt👉【TG：@trxHomeBot】，btc最新投资情况.k

Topic: Galapagos: So here's the train of thought: I am an architect working in a firm that mostly does hotels. We have a 5 star division and a budget division. The director of the firm likes to play tetris with rectalinear rooms and squeeze as many into a floor plate as possible. He prides himself on being able to achieve optimum efficiency (something i doubt). The question: Would it be possible to use galapagos to do this exercise - in effect automating the process? I ideally would like to set:Floor plate area a percentage for horizontal circulation (giving a maximum and minimum width/length) a percentage for vertical circulation (with max amd min dims) the area of a room (again setting a maximum and minimum width/length) Ultimately in the hope that 4 or 5 of the most efficient possibilities could be calculated in seconds and presented to my director? I know this request sounds remarkably unglamorous, but it drives me insane when i see him sitting there for hours "designing". I am trying to automate a lot of the processes that go on in the office and bring it into the 21st century. I am not sure how to begin this task or if it is even possible. Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks K …; Added by KK at 10:35am on March 18, 2011

Topic: about columns: ls, transferring loads with RX, Ry, Rz constrained at nodes. Would you have some hint about cheating Karamba (with some coeffs applied on material or section properties, maybe), in order to obtain some acceptable compression and bending behavior on columns (and plates, via beams arrays ?...) ? Also, I am working on OOOcalc, converting some material properties table to use with K : I like MatWeb,a great place to freak out with funky materials, where the data comes in Newton and Pascal brand for SI... when others provide it with different orders of magnitude ... I always got mad with units. Would you mind providing in the future a transparent units converter (using prefix/suffix, via your input string parsing methods will sure do it : a little effort compared to your whole GREAT work). Thanks for your so cool tool.…; Added by Stanislas Petit to Karamba3D at 3:26am on July 31, 2011

Comment on: Topic 'Analysis Mesh, export to illustrator?': t. This was a reasonably effective workflow for the purposes of solving the initial problem. (in reviewing this post, it seems a bit lengthy, but hopefully it's of use to others). Link to Illustrator Script example:https://forums.adobe.com/thread/508138 Portion I used: This applies to entire illustrator document. I am using Illustrator CC 64 bit and this worked okay. Tested a few times and it failed once, but a restart of Illustrator fixed it. var v_selection = app.activeDocument.pathItems;SwapFillStroke(v_selection); function SwapFillStroke(objSel) { for(k = 0; k < objSel.length; k++){ var subSel = objSel[k]; var c_fill = subSel.fillColor; var c_stroke = subSel.strokeColor; subSel.fillColor = c_stroke; if(!subSel.stroked) subSel.stroked = true; subSel.strokeColor = c_fill; }} redraw(); My goal was to export colored geometry, (analysis meshes for example), from Rhino and get it into illustrator with solid fills. If you want to know how meshes are colored in rhino...there are many explanations here on the forum, a quick search will get you more detailed information. Short version: export your lines from rhino to illustrator and run the script listed above to make the stroke color the fill color. (in illustrator, shift+X will swap the fill and stroke colors on individual objects, but does not work on multiple objects..hence the need for the script). Detailed Version: In my case, I had 2 case studies I was working with.1 - wind rose meshes generated from Ladybug/honeybee2 - A mesh terrain that was colored by pre-set slope values. NOTE: There are a few plugins to bake objects with color. I used Human tools, (Bake Geometry and JustifiedText3D).http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/human (lots of other great stuff in there too!) I had two types of geometry. (2 different definitions) 1- An analysis mesh, (HoneyBee/LadyBug), 2 - Lines generated from mesh faces. (mesh terrain/slope values). Export results as a DXF, and choose "do not explode". (these were my settings) DXF seemed to produce the most consistent results. (you could export/save as an AI file and just open them in illustrator, but that seemed to give inconsistent results with the script). Open DXF in Illustrator: Apply Script in illustrator: In the terrain example, there are only 5 colors, so selection in illustrator, by color, is very easy. In the results from honeybee/ladybug, (or any analysis process I imagine), the default colors are created with a much wider range of values. I presume the legend is then created by an average of those values within a range. My point is that, with the analysis results, selecting objects by color in Illustrator is probably not a very effective workflow. I only tested this on my instance of rhino and Illustrator. mileage may vary. In summation, at this point, it seems that the best way to get colored mesh faces, into illustrator, is to export the meshes, (which really ends up being the mesh face edges...curves), and bringing them into illustrator and running a quick script to swap the colors. Once that is complete, you can then select ALL the objects, and change the stroke color/weight at once.…; Added by Chris Hanley to Ladybug Tools at 4:08pm on January 13, 2015

Blog Post: RGSS(rhino & grasshopper study session)TOKYO #3: Added by Yusuke Oono at 8:26pm on July 28, 2009

Event: Digital Practice: Hong Kong: ectural project, the efficiency of design communication and the control of information-flow are as important as the creativity of ideas. In response to the concurrent digital evolution emerging in the architectural industry world-wide, the Faculty of Architecture at The University of Hong Kong will host a two week intensive summer program named Digital Practice.Led by professors from The University of Hong Kong, as well as invited practitioners with expertise in practice of cutting edge digital techniques, the program offers participants opportunities to experience applications of computational tools during different stages of an architectural project, i.e. concept design, form finding and optimization, delivery, management and communication of design information under the team-based working environment. By learning advanced computational techniques through case studies in the context of Hong Kong, participants are expected to go beyond the conventional perception of technology, considering users and tools as a feedback-based entity instead of a dichotomy. The program, which is taught in English, includes a series of evening lectures related delivered by teaching staff and invited local architects.對於高品質的建築專案，創意之外，專案過程中高效的設計資訊管理和交流成為項目設計深化和實施必不可少的環節。今天，數字化技術不但改變了建築師的繪圖工具，影響了設計的過程，而且提供了工程建造和管理實施的更有效、更高效的手段。針對建築的數位化演進，香港大學建築學院將於2011年暑假期間，在香港大學建築學院舉辦“數位化實踐”國際研習班。在香港大學建築學院教授及有著相關豐富經驗的外聘實踐建築師的指導下，學員將有機會體驗在專案的不同階段（如概念設計、設計形式的生成、優化，設計資訊的管理和交流），如何有效地應用各種運算智慧化技術（從設計的數位化生成和建築資訊類比到物理模型），提升設計實施的品質，增加設計團隊對於方案的控制。我們將挑戰對於“技術”的傳統認知，即相對於使用者它不僅是工具，更是與使用者互動的媒介，二者形成一個有機的合體。研習班期間會安排系列講座，展現數位化技術在實踐工程中的廣泛應用。…; Added by Victor Leung at 5:56am on July 25, 2011

Comment on: Photo 'Planar_hexagons01': o do this I used 'tangent duality' of the triangles (also in the paper). Yes that's the Soumaya Museum in mexico DF. I believe GT did the facade. If you look closely, the hexagons are not connecting watertight, there is a small gap between them so they can all be congruent, the small gap makes that possible. They're evenly distributed among the surface which is nothing new, it has been done before only with discs by future systems,http://www.gadailynews.com/thumbnail.php?file=assets-2012/Selfridge... For me the challenge was to create a water tight planar hexagon grid mainly for efficiency reasons. If you look at the joints, which are more simple and easy to construct (only 3 edges come together, were a quadricular grid has 4 and triangular grid 6). And of course the panels are all planar :). Aesthetics came second. With negative curvature it is not possible to aggregate your surface properly with convex planar hexagons (that fit watertight that is). That's why in the negative regions the switch from being convex to concave. See the pdf for more info, I also didnt knew this when i started messing around :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_and_concave_polygons Thanks and I`ll keep you guys posted! Cheers!…; Added by Arie-Willem de Jongh at 9:02am on April 3, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Grasshopper beginner': oint Pb, x units directly above Pa. Move Pb parallel with the y-axis for z units. Create a Bezier Ba from Pa to Pb, which has vertical tangencies at both end-points. Copy Ba (and name it Bb) and move it along the y-axis for q units. Create line segments La and Lb between the end-points of Ba and Bb. Join Ba, La, Bb and Lb into a single closed, planar curve. Extrude this curve for k units along the x-axis, creating the brep Ka. Cap Ka to create a closed solid Kb which represents one of the 4 building towers. etc. etc. Some of these steps should be do-able even for a beginner. For others you may require help from teachers or forum members. But without a written (or drawn) algorithm like the one above, this is very much a 'do my homework for me' question and they tend not to get answered. -- David Rutten david@mcneel.com Poprad, Slovakia…; Added by David Rutten at 10:13am on April 10, 2013

Comment on: Video 'Equation explorer UI': types. Equations currently working: Constant f(x) = c Linear f(x) = ax+b Parabola f(x) = a(x-h)² + k Polynomial f(x) = a + bx² + cx³ + ... Hyperbola f(x) = (ax + b) + (d/(x - c)) Reciprocal f(x) = 1/((x - b)^p) + c Logarithm f(x) = log[base](x-b) + c Cosine f(x) = a*cos(f(x-b)) + c Sinc f(x) = a(sin(f(x-b))/x) + c Gaussian Block Wave Sawtooth Wave TriangleWave Perlin Noise up to 8 octaves Interpolation of N points using various interpolation schemes: {Nearest neighbour, Linear, Cubic, Akima, Bulirsch-Stoer, Equidistant polynomial, Floater-Hormann, Neville polynomial} Rhino Curve (not quite sure yet how to expose control-points on this one) Grasshopper Expression Bezier spans, i.e. N sequential points and tangents (still working on this one actually). I could add more types such as tan, arctan, hyperbolic trig functions, square-roots, etc. etc. but I've got enough for testing purposes now.…; Added by David Rutten at 5:39am on July 21, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'Weaving Catenary/Funicular Meshes': switch entirely to code for the K2 part. 1. When you have some idea in mind you MUST have always a Plan B (see the 2 stage def as in the other one [bridging]). In fact achieving a "uniform" result is a bit tricky via K (and maybe, just maybe Plan A is a "better" approach). That said NOT all the K2 thingies required are used in this V1. 2. Plan A (stop before K2) can yield some more suitable "conical" "shapes" with an indeterminate Loft profile (NOT included: a challenge for you, he he) like the one used in the bridging example. Notice that Plan A is real-time (and when doing parametric stuff this is the goal Numero Uno). 3. Authenticity of the soap opera series is assured since there's only sardines provided as instance definitions. …; Added by peter fotiadis to Kangaroo at 11:01am on April 9, 2016

Comment on: Topic '[clarified and WIP] butterfly doesn't work with OpeFOAM v1606': r did you type paraFoam to call the OF integrated paraview, or did you maybe type paraFoam -builtin? The last one was a workaround for when paraview installation has issues. I think I remember an old bug where the version not connected to OF would give out this error. I will check it as soon as I can to make sure it's not smth in our case setup. Concerning the boxes on the display that is the refinement of your mesh. The fastest way to get a more refined image is to go back to your blockMesh and change the number of cells in x and y directions (and thus the size of these squares) and go through the whole process of meshing and solving again. Bare in mind doubling the cell number makes a 4 times bigger mesh, which would also delay the simulation a bit (but really for such a small model it would still be fairly fast). Another thing you can do in coarse or even medium quality meshes is to display the point values and not the cell values. You can do that in the dropdown menu where you select which fluid parameter to display (U, p, k, epsilon, etc.). In your screenshot I can see the cell value is currently selected. By selecting point values Parafoam should interpolate the display automatically and provide a more 'refined' image (but not a more accurate result). Should make a small difference in such a coarse mesh but this works quite nicely in medium to better meshes. Kind regards, Theodore.…; Added by Theodoros Galanos to Ladybug Tools at 10:06am on August 6, 2016