for the version in Python.
It would be nice if you could drop your code into the WIP Rhinocommon reference:
http://developer.rhino3d.com/wip/api/RhinoCommonWin/html/M_Rhino_Geometry_LinearDimension_Create.htm…
Added by Nik Willmore at 9:29am on August 14, 2017
s you will have to adapt the following:
The Assemble-, LineToBeam- and MeshToShell-components have an input plug 'LDist' which sets the minimum distance between two nodes to 5mm by default.
The 'MeshBReps' component of Karamba 1.2.2 does not work properly for meshes with an edge length smaller than 5mm.
In the ModelView-component the default length of segments for displaying beam meshes is 1m.
There might be problems with the line results on shells: you will have to increase the segment length there.
The solver though should work fine with the different number ranges.
Best,
Clemens
…
ing an error.
1. Hidden line drawing failed to compute.
Is the clipping plane the plane where it starts to clip, or the one that defines the depth of what is to be made 2d?
Any help would be much appreciated, the make 2D is an amazing tool to have.
Thanks for all the beautiful work put into this, that enables the rest of us to work so much more efficiently. If it wasn't for grasshopper i would have quit architecture long long ago.
make2dtest.gh…
trators rights, or blocked port.As for your second problem:
"0. Runtime error (MissingMemberException): 'LightException' object has no attribute 'components'1. Traceback:line 43, in script"
It is caused by an old ghpython component. You need to have at least version 0.6.0.3. Download it from here.…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 10:30am on April 24, 2019
lf.
Essentially Data Matching algorithms kick in when inputs don't match up. If you connect a line component (two inputs, starting and ending points) to two lists of point coordinates that have a different number of points, it is not clear which points are supposed to be connected. You can pick among three different matching algorithms to find the one that suits you best.
Data Matching algorithms can be set on a per-component basis through the menu of the component.
…
ommand and have all of them generate in the proper position. I have attached my work around where I extracted all of my cross section curves from a list but that is obviously a messy way to go about it and if I decide to change my number of holes it falls apart a bit.
I ended up adding section curves and doing Sweep2 when an attempt using loft used every line to make one big messy surface.
This is probably a data or tree issue but I haven't got that down yet and my tests in that sphere did not provide any answers.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark…
another surface.
(I have been using a VB component that I found on this forum which allows surfaces to be trimmed using curves. That is great. But it would be good to have this as a core component in GH).
2. Curve MIDPOINT: Preferably “Endpoints” component should include midpoint too… In my experience, getting a midpoint by first dividing a curve and then selecting an item from the list is too cumbersome for something that seems to be quite basic.
3. PERPENDICULAR: Ability to pick the perpendicular direction or draw a line perpendicular to a curve in a given plane and/or at a given point. Again, I feel like this is a basic function which is used quite often.
Thank you.
Sameer…
Added by Sameer Kumar at 7:18pm on September 11, 2009
he 3 loft curves are the same.
the moment one point is being moved the offset surface fails.
this doesn't make sense to me. what could be a reason for that.
working
failed:
you can also see that the curve offset produces not problems but than the loft
command does not show any surface but also does not give any visible surface.
claas…
to be triangular (not square, and not a diagrid) and modular (+ therefore not warped by the projection onto the surface).
hard to explain. i've attached the file of the module. (the surface i want to panel isn't important, i just need it to be editable.)
each of the triangles needs to be dependent on the ones around it, so that the modules can change shape, (fold and turn inside out) but also needs to stay the same size (this needs to be built out of all one sized panel) which is why i've made surfaces between the points of the line. but really, i dont know if this is the right way to go about it at all.
if anyone has any tips on how i could go about this (or if it is even possible) it would be greatly appreciated.
thanks,
mhairi.…