1 assembly. I think something is mixed up with the refenced dll. but I do not know what.I am using 4.net with visualstudio 2010. It was possible fo example to bind opennurbs.dll as assembly in Rhino4 and older grasshopper about mid 2010. Now in Rhino5 and the new Grasshopper it throws errors. I think some assemblies are mixed up. I cannot use Rhino.IO.3dmfile.Read as it does not have all functions i need for building a proper database.
here is some buggy code snippet for getting the layertree.
// pre define OnTextLog dump_to_stdout = new OnTextLog(); dump_to_stdout.SetIndentSize(2); OnTextLog dump = dump_to_stdout; OnFileHandle dump_fp = null; OnXModel model = new OnXModel(); bool bVerboseTextDump = true; string sFileName = @"C:\test.3dm"; // open file containing opennurbs archive OnFileHandle archive_fp = OnUtil.OpenFile(sFileName, "rb"); if (archive_fp == null) { dump.Print(" Unable to open file.\n"); //continue; } dump.PushIndent(); // create archive object from file pointer OnBinaryArchive archive = new OnBinaryFile(IOn.archive_mode.read3dm, archive_fp); // read the contents of the file into "model" bool rc = model.Read(ref archive, dump); // close the file OnUtil.CloseFile(archive_fp); RMA.OpenNURBS.ArrayOnLayer layer_array = model.m_layer_table; // layerstruktur lesen List <System.Guid> list_int = new List<System.Guid>(); List <System.Guid> list_parent = new List<System.Guid>(); for (int i = 0;layer_array.Count() > i;i++) { list_int.Add(layer_array[i].m_layer_id); list_parent.Add(layer_array[i].m_parent_layer_id); } // calculate List <int> list_depth = new List<int>(); for (int i = 0;list_int.Count > i;i++) { list_depth.Add(tree_decompose(i, list_int, list_parent)); } A = list_depth;</item> <item name="AdditionalSource" type_name="gh_string" type_code="10">
int tree_decompose (int position, List<System.Guid> list_guuid, List<System.Guid> list_parent) { int temp_position = position; int send = 0; if (position != 0){ if (list_parent[position] != System.Guid.Empty) { temp_position = list_guuid.IndexOf(list_parent[position]); send = 1 + tree_decompose(temp_position, list_guuid, list_parent); } if (list_parent[position] == System.Guid.Empty){send = 0;} } if(position == 0){send = 0;} return send; }…
ifically, in your picture, it looks like you're feeding two different pieces of data into the same Data input (D0) of the Anemone Loop Start component. If you zoom in on the component in Grasshopper, you'll see that you can add and subtract Data inputs via little +/- symbols, so you can have D0, D1, D2, etc. (Note: when you do this, Anemone Loop End will return an error if it doesn't have the same amount of Data inputs as the Loop Start, so be sure to add them there as well.) Attaching your original data to different inputs keeps them nicely separated during the looped Anemone process.
The nature (and usefulness) of Anemone is that it allows you to take data output by some functions and use it as the input for that same set of functions (normally forbidden under usual Grasshopper logic). So let's say that you want to take a sphere(Sphere0) and stack progressively smaller versions of that sphere on top of it. You feed the sphere into [Loop Start] as D0, and right away, it comes out of the [Loop Start] D0 output exactly the same, because nothing has happened to it yet. You take Sphere0 from the D0 output, let's say scale it by .8, and transform it up appropriately so it sits on top of the last sphere. Now you have Sphere1! Feed Sphere1 into the D0 input of [Loop End], and now (if the # of repeats allows) Sphere1 is the D0 output of [Loop Start]. So if it goes again, it'll scale and transform Sphere1, resulting in a smaller Sphere2, and so on and so forth for as long as you want. If you right-click on the [Loop End] component, you'll see some options labelled "Output after the last" and "Record Data". If neither option is checked, then you'll see the loop calculating in real time, and the only thing that will come out of the D0 output for [Loop End] is the smallest sphere. If you check only "Record Data," then D0 will contain all of the spheres made from the loops. If you check only "Output after the last," then you won't see anything output to D0 until it's entirely finished calculating all the loops. If you check both options, then D0 will output all the spheres, but only after it's finished calculating everything.
In my snake pictured here, there is a constant # of scales placed around each loop of the tube, let's say 10. But since the tube has variable circumferences, the size of the scales needs to vary based on the circumference of their loop. Furthermore, since the size of the scales varies, the distance between each loop must also vary so that there aren't unsightly gaps between loops. So you take the length of Loop0 and divide it by 20 (2 times the # of scales, since you only use every other scale to achieve this pattern), and use that as the distance between Loop0 and Loop1. But since Loop1 has a smaller circumference, Loop1 divided by 20 is going to yield a smaller number than the first one, and that's why you need to use Anemone to make a loop to find all of this out.
This might be more granular than you wanted, but I hope that some of it helps.
…
controlled by the brightness of the image and size of the diagrid panel is controlled by lunchbox). The frame surrounding each window is then extruded to shade the window within. The extrusion distance for the diamonds' 4 points are controlled by 4 sliders (one for each point).
My goal is to find the total radiation of the windows using Ladybug (or DIVA) and then use Galapagos to adjust the frame extrusions to optimize them to best shade the windows. However, in order to obtain an effective pattern for shading, I need to be able to move the 4 control points independently for each panel... So instead of adjusting all of the panels at once, I need to control each panel extrusion on its own.
First off, I'm not sure how to control each panel independently. Secondly, I'm afraid this will result in far too many sliders for Galapagos to handle (especially once it's applied to the scale of a facade). I tried using a random number generator for each point (which kept the slider count to only 4), but Galapagos was unable to identify any trends in this method (because it was entirely random) and thus could not optimize the extrusions. I think the most probable solution may be to limit the quantity of possible outcomes by making an index of pre-baked shapes (let's say 10 different frame types). Then, setting up a script that allows Galapagos to "plug-in" each different frame, at each different panel on a facade until it finds the ideal pattern. I'm not sure how to go about doing this either... specifically in a non-random way that will allow Galapagos to identify trends. Maybe by using hoopsnake?
I've attached my grasshopper definition. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
…
Added by Caleb Wild at 12:20pm on February 14, 2015
n the z axis I can not, here's the problem, because the movement is not only on the z axis, I can't do a serie with this vector. I tried to do it by differents columns or rows but its impossible for me.
2. Another problem. How I can fill a surface like this with tetrahedrons? What about change the size of this tetrahedrons? Is it possible like a fractal? :Si'm still working...
Thank you!
Finally I have completed the cloud!! I am a little bit fool. With the help of some sketches it was not so difficult! :).
I found the movement pattern of my tetrahedrons
Then I found the points inside my surface!
But now I cant create lines between points like in the begining of the process, with the pattern with points 1, 2, 3, 4. What I have to do?
??????????
Bye!!!…
via MIDI controllers.
my idea is to link PureData to GH via UDP. why pure data? cause' i can relate data like GH to generate numeric relations (and link it to audio generation)
so far i got PD and Processing to talk, but i can't get to grasshopper.
i use this definitions to make pd and processing to talk http://ubaa.net/shared/processing/udp/ and this GHX to get the data to GH http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/attachment/download?id=2985220%3...
i got this data from this post but the GH definition doesn't work for me. i have tried LAN definitions and "the engine" as well but they both freeze, even if i send data thru processing or PD.
i have a lot of questions at this time
1.- why processing tells me that i am getting the data from diferent ports, while i'm using 6000?
2.- why in the UDP definition i get no data out, even if it should say something like "waiting fordata/port/etc.." that's defined in the C# capsule
3.- is there a direct way to get midi data (key and CC) to GH
i also tried to use firefly to get the data via COM port. i know you can do this trick in processing but i just don't know how.
well. if anyone could help me i would share the results here (since it's a magister, results shoud be very interesting)
UDP has allways been a unsolved issue on other posts. maybe we could work it out ;)
Thanks…
Added by jota aldunce at 8:43am on September 28, 2010
s my code, so I decided to write a new simple component refreshing all time at 300 ms interval and the problem came up again. The code provoking the display exceptions and images with the erros are listed below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
using System;using System.Drawing;using Grasshopper.Kernel;using FirstComp.Properties;using System.Timers;namespace FirstComp{ public class FirstCompGH : GH_Component { private Timer myTimer = new Timer(300); //3 veces por segundo private Random rand = new Random(DateTime.Now.Millisecond); public FirstCompGH() : base("Nombre", "Abreviado", "Descripcion", "Categoría", "SubCat") { myTimer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(MainLoop); myTimer.Start(); } protected override void RegisterInputParams(GH_Component.GH_InputParamManager pManager) { pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Op A", "A", "Primer parámetro de la operación",0.0); pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Op B", "B", "Segundo parámetro de la operación",0.0); } protected override void RegisterOutputParams(GH_Component.GH_OutputParamManager pManager) { pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Suma", "S", "Resultado de la suma"); pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Resta", "R", "Resultado de la resta"); pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Mult", "M", "Resultado de la multiplicación"); pManager.Register_DoubleParam("Div", "D", "Resultado de la división"); } protected override void SolveInstance(IGH_DataAccess DA) { // Variables para contener los datos de entrada // Le podemos asignar algunos valores iniciales. double opA = double.NaN, opB = double.NaN; // El objeto DA recupera los datos de la entrada. // Si no hay datos de entrada abortamos. if (!DA.GetData(0, ref opA)) { return; } if (!DA.GetData(1, ref opB)) { return; } opA += rand.Next(1,10); opB += rand.Next(1,10); // Ahora realizamos las operaciones matemáticas DA.SetData(0, (opA + opB)); DA.SetData(1, (opA - opB)); DA.SetData(2, (opA * opB)); if (opB != 0) //Rhino.RhinoMath.ZeroTolerance DA.SetData(3, (opA/opB)); else { AddRuntimeMessage(GH_RuntimeMessageLevel.Error, "Error de división por cero"); return; } } public override Guid ComponentGuid { get { return new Guid("44BEA3FE-7CB8-42fe-AEC9-BE5F6EE424E8");} } protected void MainLoop(object source, ElapsedEventArgs e) { this.ExpireSolution(true); } protected override Bitmap Internal_Icon_24x24 { get { return Resources.icono; } } }}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Images showing errors.
I can't figure out what is causing these errors.
Best Regards
Ernesto
…
frontare il tema della modellazione parametrica con Grasshopper. Questa plug-in di Rhino consente di progettare, confrontandosi con un contesto evolutivo, attraverso la comprensione e l'utilizzo di parametri e componenti che influenzano la rappresentazione e la rendono dinamica componendo algoritmi. Nel corso verranno introdotte le nozioni base di Grasshopper approfondendo le metodologie della progettazione parametrica e le tecniche di modellazione algoritmica per la generazione di forme complesse.Le informazioni teoriche saranno fornite in maniera accelerata ma organica e contestuale agli argomenti elencati. Per massimizzare i risultati, le lezioni saranno accompagnate da piccole esercitazioni pratiche.Argomenti trattati:- Introduzione alla progettazione parametrica: teoria, esempi, casi studio- Grasshopper: concetti base, logica algoritmica, interfaccia grafica- Nozioni fondamentali: componenti, connessioni, data flow- Funzioni matematiche e logiche, serie, gestione dei dati- Analisi e definizione di curve e superfici- Definizione di griglie e pattern complessi- Trasformazioni geometriche, paneling- Attrattori, image sampler- Data tree: gestione di dati complessiStrutturaIl corso ha una durata di 16 ore programmate nell'arco di 2 giornate con i seguenti orari: i giorni 28/07 e 29/07 dalle 10,00 alle 19,00 con pausa pranzo di un'ora.DestinatariIl corso è rivolto a tutti coloro che hanno buone conoscenze di Rhinoceros e vogliono affrontare i nuovi metodi di progettazione in maniera consapevole attraverso il linguaggio visual scripting proposto dal software Grasshopper.PrerequisitiPer affrontare il corso è richiesta una conoscenza di base del software Rhino attraverso esperienze teoriche e pratiche. I partecipanti dovranno venire muniti di proprio laptop e con software Rhinoceros 5 o Rhinocero 4 perfettamente funzionanti.AttestatoAlla fine del corso verrà rilasciata l’attestato di partecipazione ad un corso qualificato McNeel valido per l’ottenimento di crediti formativi universitari.LuogoLe lezioni si terranno presso lo studio il Pedone in Via Muggia 33, 00195 ROMA…
ences, so not terribly important in the end. After all, it's not really worth going through a lot of trouble to get a 15% speed increase; 15% faster than slow is still pretty slow.
Also processor speed has pretty much peaked these past few years, there have been no more significant increases lately. Instead, manufacturers have started putting more cores on motherboards, which is something GH unfortunately cannot take advantage of.
Multi-threading (very high on the list for GH2) brings with it a promise of full core utilisation (minus the inevitable overhead for aggregating computed results), but there are some problems that may end up being significant. Here's a non-exhaustive list:
It's not possible to modify the UI from a non-UI thread. This is probably not that big a deal for Grasshopper components, especially since we can make methods such a Rhino.RhinoApp.WriteLine() thread safe.
Not all methods used by component code are necessarily thread safe. There used to be a lot of stuff in the Rhino SDK that simply wouldn't work correct or would crash if the same method was run more than once simultaneously. Rhino core team has been working hard to remedy this problem, and I'm confident we can fix any problems that still come up, though it may take some time. If components rely on other code libraries then the problem may not be solvable at all. So we need to make sure multi-threading is an optional property of components.
There's overhead involved in multi-threading, it's especially difficult to get a good performance gain when dealing with lots of very fast operations. The overhead in these cases can actually make stuff perform slower.
There's the question on what level should multi-threading be implemented. Obviously the lower the better, but that means a lot of extra work, complicated patterns of responsibilities and a lot of communications between different developers.
There's the question on how the interface should behave during solutions now. If all the computation is happening in a thread, the interface can stay 'live'. So what should it look like if a solution takes -say- 5 seconds to complete? Should you be able to see the waves of data streaming through the network, turning components and wires grey and orange like strobe lights? What happens if you modify a slider during a solution? Simple answer is to abort the current solution and start a new one with the new slider value. But as you slowly drag the slider from left to right, you end up computing 400 partial solution and never getting to a final answer, even though you could have computed 2 full solutions in the same time and given better feedback. Does the preview geometry in the Rhino viewports flicker in and out of existence as solutions cascade through the network?
…
ace Syntax." eCAADe 2013 18 (2013): 357.
http://www.sss9.or.kr/paperpdf/mmd/sss9_2013_ref048_p.pdf
The measure Entropy is newer. I hereby explain it (from my PhD dissertation):
Entropy values, as described in (Hillier & Hanson, The Social Logic of Space, 1984) and specified in (Turner A. , “Depthmap: A Program to Perform Visibility Graph Analysis, 2007), intuitively describe the difficulty of getting to other spaces from a certain space. In other words, the higher the entropy value, the more difficult it is to reach other spaces from that space and vice-versa. We compute the spatial entropy of the node as using the point depth set:
(11)
“The term is the maximum depth from vertex and is the frequency of point depth *d* from the vertex” (ibid). Technically, we compute it using the function below, which itself uses some outputs and by-products from previous calculations:
Algorithm 4: Entropy Computation
Given the graph (adjacency lists), Depths as List of List of integer, DepthMap as Dictionary of integer
Initialize Entropies as List(double)
For node as integer in range [0, |V|)
integer How_Many_of_D=0
double S_node=0
For depth as integer in range [1, Depths[node].Max()]
How_Many_of_D=DepthMap.Branch[(node,depth)].Count
double frequency= How_Many_of_D/|V|
S_node = S_node - frequency * Math.Log(frequency, 2)
Next
Entropies [node] = S_node
Next
…
you working on a PV system which will power a domestic hot water boiler?
To answer your questions:1) Each grasshopper component (ghpython being one of those too) is using grasshopper's data matching algorithm. This algorithm takes care of complex issues which may arise from combining lists with single items, data trees with different number of items per branch and so on.I think there is a way of introducing a call to other processor's threads per each inputted surface, but this will be a very difficult job, as it will require writing a custom data matching algorithm. I do not think I am up to that task.Instead I tried to introduce the multithread only to the final part of the PVsurface component and one of its time consuming parts: calculation of sun angles, solar radiation and ac/dc power output.I attached the test file below, but sadly it didn't go well: the multithreaded version mostly runs at the same time as the regular version.I do not think I am qualified enough to answer why is that so, but I think that it may have something to do with the type of the function that the multithreading is applied to: the code is suppose to run few separate functions a couple of thousand times, and work with a couple of lists. From my experience, the multithreading works the best when a single list or two are supplied to a single function. I may be wrong on this.I am very sorry to say that I can not implement this feature.2) I am not familiar if open source PV modules database has been released.But one can always download the data for specific modules from producers websites. It can then easily be transferred to a .csv file or other text file.Ladybug Photovoltaics are based on NREL's PVWatts model.In comparison with other commercial software applications, PVWatts offers a more generalized system model, with some of the values and characteristics being assumed or embedded.The Fuentes empirical thermal model we are currently using follows the same logic: it generalizes the Module characteristics. The following characteristics are only editable: module efficiency, temperature coefficient and module mount type.It may be possible to replace Fuentes with some other, less generalized 5 parameter thermal model. But as an architect, I would definitively need help on this.
Sorry if my reply did not fulfill your expectations, and thank you for the kind words!…