tly light vehicles such as bicycles and variations thereof. Although frame design is mostly of a structural nature, there are a number of elements that interact mechanically. Also, as you may be aware, bicycle and high grade tubing is not of constant section so shelling method in FEA is out of the question, but even so, because the joint needs to be modeled very accurately, that means different geometry and properties for welded area, heat affected area and base material; like so a simpler FEA package may not suffice.
I don't know karamba extensively, rather superficially, actually, but I'm under the impression it mostly deals with beam analysis. Pls correct me if I am under the wrong impression. I must say it would be very nice to have a complete FEA package inside GH really!!
Typical workflow for me would be to model everything in Solidworks, and then export to Ansys Mechanical. Although Ansys needs to read every input and naturally remesh back again, integration within Solidworks, Catia, Inventor, Creo, Solidthinking... and the sort, works reasonably well.
Now, I don't remember Ansys having a Rhinoceros plugin so that you could bridge the 2 together, but maybe I should go check again.
3) Great work with that fractal tree. It's nice to know it is a possibility at least. I have tried Apophysis and others, but to my knowledge there's not an application that could deliver 3D fractal designs in a way that you could further manipulate with conventional modelling techniques, maybe apply textures and render, or export to CAM, 3D printing... etc.
P.S.: I have tried all the apps mentioned above and then some more. All of them have serious limitations when it comes to parametric design. For complex models they crash plenty upon rebuilding... a number of time consuming errors appear, and general work flow isn't very efficient for purely parametric work. Speaking for myself, I'd rather spend the time on a definition that enables me to have full control and then generate a new result within seconds, than model everything very quickly and then taking a long time with each new result.
(Thanks for the replies and sorry for the long text, you asked to elaborate).…
le] demo):
1. A transformation Matrix is a 4*4 collection of 16 values that "deform" 3d things according the values in the cells. The orthodox way is to deploy "cells" left to right and top to bottom. Rhino does the opposite (why?) hence we need the transpose method.
2. Since "translate" and "perspective" are "symmetrical" the transpose boolean toggle (within the C#) "flips" rows with columns ... so we get perspective or move.
3. When in perspective "mode" the vanishing points are computed internally within a min/max limit (per X/Y/Z axis) thus avoiding the usual havoc with "extreme" perspective angles (very common "glitz" in pretty much every CAD app - CATIA excluded). Vanishing points (and limits) are oriented with respect the pos/neg value of a given control slider.
Note: slider values are percentages between min/max (mode: perspective) and/or actual values*100 (mode: move).
4.In order to start mastering the whole thing: don't change anything: just play with these 4 sliders selected:
5. The 123 sardine cans challenge: even with DeusExMachine = true (see inside C#: that one redirects the transformation per BrepFace and then joins the breps instead of applying it on a brep basis)... odd things (and/or invalid breps) occur ... thus what is required in order to make things working 100% ??.
he, he
best, Lord of Darkness …
printers.
How I want to communicate this: The depth of transparent cubes is relative to the brightness of a picture (low depth = bright, high depth = dark). Then I assign each cube as red or blue depending on the RGB values of the cube column's corresponding pixel - this is where I'm stuck.
What I've done: I have one image sampler containing a greyscale version of my image which is outputting the brightness measurements. This made into lines, which are divided to create the points from which the cubes are created. (I have had to invert the image in photoshop as brightness gives black a low value when I need a high one, and vice versa)
What I want to do next: In the second image sampler I have an image which has a Red to Blue gradient applied to it. I want to group my cubes into reds and blues depending on the colour values in this image (so they could eventually be saved as a "blue" and "red" stl to be 3D printed).
So columns that correspond to a blue part of the image will contain a completely blue stack of cubes, and the same with red. But where there's a combination of blue and red values I need a combination of blue and red cubes mixed together. I was hoping to do this by turning the RGB values into some kind of ratio that will help assign each cube a group but I'm struggling.
Would love any thoughts on resolving my problem, even if it's only for part of it! This was quite hard to explain so let me know if there's anything that needs clarifying.
Thanks…
utorial on the Karamba 3d website.
3 different wind pressures (---> 3 different mesh loads) are applied, increasing with altitude as per Eurocode calculations:
0-32m : 550,59 N/m2
32-64m : 729,80 N/m2
64-100m : 867,85 N/m2
Care has been taken to ensure no superpostion of forces at 32m & 64m.
550,59 N/m2 is transmitted to floor slabs @ 0m, 4m, 8m, 12m, 16m, 20m, 24m & 28m.
729,80 N/m2 is transmitted to floor slabs @ 32m, 36m, 40m, 44m, 48m, 52m, 56m & 60m.
867,85 N/m2 is transmitted to floor slabs @ 64m, 68m, 72m, 76m, 80m, 84m, 88m, 92m, 96m & 100m.
When the loads are visualised simultaneously in Karamba, one obtains, as anticipated, a "stepped" distribution with point loads increasing with altitude (Image_1).
Ex:
46 @ 0-34m
60 @ 34-64m
72 @ 64-100m
However, you will also notice several "rogue" point loads at the outer edges, presenting very large values (500-1000) (Image_1 & Image_2).
Would anyone know why these appear and/or have any ideas as to what can be done to correct things? I suspect an issue with the way the tower is meshed?
Many thanks in advance for any feedback you may provide,
Nathan…
uld be much better than Rhino at huge mesh collections. I'd personally try free Autodesk Meshmixer and ZBrush first but most designers are more familiar with rendering programs like Maya or 3DS Max. I'm not familiar enough with architecture to suggest a list as only Revit and Sketchup come to mind.
Looking more closely, CAD Exporter is only for 2D curves and points, how silly, and it requires baked geometry in a Rhino layer:
I could write a Python script to export an STL but that would be a large ascii format file instead of binary. Better to use OBJ to retain quad faces, too.
Ah, well, OBJ files are also ascii format when exported from Rhino, so it would be quite easy to make a script to export those directly to disk from Grasshopper. Here is one box, 10X10X20 in size, with quad faces:
# Rhino
o object_1v 10 10 20v 10 10 0v 10 0 20v 10 0 0v 0 10 20v 0 10 0v 0 0 20v 0 0 0f 5 7 3 1f 5 6 8 7f 3 7 8 4f 2 4 8 6f 5 1 2 6f 3 4 2 1
If I have time I'll make a little script to write such OBJ files unless you can find a native Grasshopper plugin for direct OBJ export in full 3D for meshes.…
l, espacial, joyeria, calzado, visualización.
Rhino ha sido diseñando para la creación de geometrias complejas con gran exactitud y suavidad, esto es logrado gracias al uso de los NURBS ( Non Uniform Rational B-spline).
Razones para usar Rhino:
-Necesidad de un programa CAD potente para modelar 3D fácilmente tanto diseños rectangulares como formas orgánicas muy complejas,
-Plataforma intuitiva, sencilla, sin complicar los comandos inecesariamente
-Gran flexibilidad en formatos de exportación e importación de archivos
-Licencia profesional y estudiantil más ecónomica que otros softwares CAD
-Soporte técnico eficiente -Gran variedad de plugins -Comunidad internacional de desarrolladores
-Con rhinoceros también puedes hacer diseño generativo o paramétrico mendiante su pligin Grasshopper, y también cuenta con plugins para volverlo sistema BIM (Building Information Modeling).
Destionado a:
Arquitectos, diseñadores industriales, interioristas, urbanistas, ingenieros industriales, joyeros.
+info:
http://www.studioseed.net/formacion-seed/formacion-espana/diseno-generativo-barcelona/rhinoceros/ PUEDES CONTACTAR DIRECTAMENTE CON NOSOTROS VIA EMAIL cursoseed@krfr.org
contacto + 34 935.321.548
Esperamos conocerte !
EQUIPO SEED…
Added by SEED studio at 11:51am on February 14, 2012
ial-by-nao-box-morphing/), but there are several reasons as to why it wasn't suitable for what I'm trying to do;
1. I'm interested in using a 2D pattern rather than a 3D form, which will then be repeated within a Paneling point grid which is assigned to a surface. The repeated patterns are then pulled onto the surface, which are then used to trim the surface.
2. The surface I'm using has high curvature, and using box morphing intersects the surface, so it doesn't conform to the surface as closely as I'd like it to unless the number of repeats along U and V are increased.
3. The surface I'd like to use has various trimmed regions on it. Paneling Tools is great for me, because the 2D pattern is repeated on a Surface Domain point grid, so it is initially repeated over the the trimmed regions, but once since the Pull setting is used, only the repeated pattern curves that lie over the kept surface remain (see Paneling tools jpeg).
The surface I've used in the images isn't the surface I need to use, but hopefully it shows what I'm trying to do. Also, I've managed to get the patterning that I need on the paneling tool example, but the reason why I want to use Grasshopper is that it allows me to scale up/down the UV ratio of the paneling points by using a slider tool, so the user can change the pattern density. The only trouble with this is that I can't bake the points out of Grasshopper into Rhino so I can use paneling tools.
Also...I'd quite like to know how the VB module works, because I'm curious, and I'd like to learn more!
Sorry if this is a bit wordy, but I can't think of a better way of explaining what I need.
Cheers, Abs…
ject that involves the design of an app that allows people to interact with a 3d model through some sliders.)
Ok, imagine you have a symmetrical shape like the one i drew:
What I intend to do is to have different 3 sliders that allow me to adjust the 3 distances (x, y, z) independently of one another.
-1st question: my idea is to draw the curves in rhino, then use the "divide" and "list item" components to extract the points I need. Is it correct? :D
-2nd question: the "move away from" component can be used in a symmetric way?
(I try to be more specific: with only one slider, can I move both points 5 and 6 simultaneously about the axis i drew?)
-3rd question: is there a way that allows the curves to reshape themselves as I move the slider related to the distance between a couple of points?
I hope I have been clear ;) I would greatly appreciate any help you can give me!
Matteo…
a nodi, permette di sfruttara le potenza della programmazione, senza necessariamente avere competenze avanzate.
Con Grasshopper potrete avere accesso ai segreti della modellazione generativa, un nuovo linguaggio progettuale che sta cambiando il mondo del design, a partire dalla gioielleria, fino ad arrivare all'architettura.
Durante il corso sarà possibile comprendere le caratteristiche di funzionamento del programma e applicarlo alla creazione di oggetti complessi che potranno essere stampati in 3D, oppure renderizzati. La durata è di 30 ore e alla fine del percorso verrà rilasciato il certificato McNeel.
Il Programma
Il corso spiega i concetti base di modellazione parametrica e generativa. Nello specifico:
Interfaccia e comandi
Parametri e componenti
Interopazione con Rhinoceros
Strumenti di parametrizzazione
Combinazione dati
Data tree
Creazioni di superfici attraverso algoritmi di paneling
Teoria degli attrattori
Gestione strumenti mesh
Creazione di Cluster
Durante il corso saranno proposte esercitazioni pratiche sul campo di utilizzo preferito dallo studente
Il docente
Antonino Marsala, è un formatore certificato McNeel con alle spalle oltre 11 anni di esperienza nel settore della modellazione 3D. Oltre ad occuparsi di formazione, collabora con aziende orafe e di architettura per la messa in pratica dei principi di modellazione generativa, applicandoli a casi reali.
FAQ
Quanto costa il corso?
Il prezzo del corso è di 500,00 € + IVA che potranno essere saldati in una soluzione unica. Nel caso di iscrizione di gruppo, potrà essere applicato uno sconto.
Cosa posso portare e cosa non devo portare all'evento?
Gli organizzatori forniranno computer con il software già installato. Nel caso vogliate portare il vostro computer, vi forniremo una versione trial da 90giorni di Rihnoceros e Grasshopper
Dove posso contattare l'organizzatore per qualsiasi domanda?
antonio@mandarinoblu.com
334 24 20 203
La mia registrazione o il mio biglietto è trasferibile?
Si, purchè venga comunicato il cambiamento entro 48 ore dalla partena del corso
…