component gives a warning about buckling in 1 or 2 modes. This also happens when I reduce the loads on the top chord, there are no loads on the bottom chord. For example:
> 92 kN/m no warning
83 kN/m buckling in 1 mode
50 kN/m buckling in 2 modes
<50 kN/m no warning
Since the truss is supported in the top chord against global buckling, this warning must be about the bottom chord? But the bottom chord doesn't have compressive forces, then what could this warning be about? And is there a way to check where it buckles (the modes in the warning)?
Thank you in advance!
Kind regards,
Cansu
…
being driven by the wii nunchuck... But, here's my issue. I tried it first by having the output from the listener be a 6-digit number... so, I'm using the (CInt(Val(StoredValue))) command and it's writing out 181130... and I can easily split it up selecting the Left(x,3) or Right(x,3)... I first rant that number through a Format("{0:000000}",x) so that even if one of the accx or accy numbers were a 2-digit number (so my overall number would only have 5-digits)... with this Format function... I'm always assured a 6-digit number. And this method works... except...
If the first group of numbers coming in only has 2-digits... So, lets say the accelerometer read out of the first one (accx) is 89. Let's say the accy read out is 119. So, when I run this through the Format function to make it have at least 6 digits, my number now reads 011989. So, if I were to take the first three numbers on the right, my read out would be 989... which is much higher than my expected (60-180 range that is really coming over the Serial Port)... So, I'm back to where I started... in that I need to figure out a better way to split up the data.
Which brings me to your method. I tried it as well... in fact, I added a comma in the serial readout, so the string coming out of the listener reads 89,119. So, I can use your trick to go look for a delimeter and then read to the left and right a certain number of digits... The problem I still have is that the data going into the function is a string, and thus even if I split the 3 digits to the right of the comma out (so, my output says 119)... it's still a string, and my number parameter is still red. In your picture above, was your original 181 130 a number or a string? My guess is that it was understood as a number, because your number parameters at the end are accepting the value. But, in my case... I'm still stuck with the inability to convert a string to a number... Does this make sense? And are their any other workarounds?…
Added by Andy Payne at 9:42am on September 3, 2009
with the Kinect, however.
I've reinstalled the SDK several times, tried multiple Kinects & USB + AC adaptors. Running it on Windows 7 (bootcamp) and Windows 7 (Parallels + Yosemite). Parallels tools is also installed properly.
I'm just not sure how to proceed. If anyone has information on these issues, please advise. Thank you.
…
Added by Matt Heinzler at 4:34pm on November 25, 2015
do it? can someone help me out?
here, i tried listing out all the divided points of the 3 curves to get a list of values to interpolate. but, if i try that, i am able to only list out the points of AB and CD. so, i used two lists to get divided points, first list of AB, CD and second of CD, EF. but, then, how do i join the list and interpolate the curves?…
io D'Amato, Prof. Giuseppe Fallacara
Co-supervisors:
Prof. Francesco Ruggiero, Prof. Giuseppe Carlo Marano
Graduating students:
Maurizio Barberio
Nicola Boccadoro
Micaela Colella
Giovanni Debernardis
Tamara Mazzelli
Angela Nitti
Awards:
A' Design Award (Silver Medal). Category: Engineering, Construction and Infrastructure Design
Premio Italiano Architettura Sostenibile 2014,
MENZIONE D'ONORE - Categoria: Architettura e tecnologie Sostenibili
International Architecture Thesis Awards 2014
Rethinking The Future - http://re-thinkingthefuture.org
First Award - Category: Transport…