8.3.0************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...************* 829 Construction,************* indicated Name=PELLE001************* Only last 10 lines before error line shown.....
************* 832 AIR WALL2, !- - Layer 2************* 833 X-LAM, !- - Layer 3************* 834 POLYSTYRENE2, !- - Layer 4************* 835 PANNELLO VIP, !- - Layer 5************* 836 POLYSTYRENE2, !- - Layer 6************* 837 X-LAM, !- - Layer 7************* 838 LANA DI ROCCIAS, !- - Layer 8************* 839 VANO IMPIANTI, !- - Layer 9************* 840 LANA DI ROCCIAS, !- - Layer 10************* 841 LASTRA IN GESSOFIBRA, !- - Layer 11** Severe ** IP: IDF line~841 Error detected for Object=CONSTRUCTION** ~~~ ** Maximum arguments reached for this object, trying to process ->LASTRA IN GESSOFIBRA<-************* IDF Context for following error/warning message:************* Note -- lines truncated at 300 characters, if necessary...************* 985 Construction,************* indicated Name=ROOF001************* Only last 10 lines before error line shown.....************* 988 TRAVETTI, !- - Layer 2************* 989 TAVOLATO, !- - Layer 3************* 990 POLYSTYRENE2, !- - Layer 4************* 991 PANNELLO VIP, !- - Layer 5************* 992 POLYSTYRENE2, !- - Layer 6************* 993 X-LAM, !- - Layer 7************* 994 LANA DI ROCCIAS, !- - Layer 8************* 995 VANO IMPIANTI, !- - Layer 9************* 996 LANA DI ROCCIAS, !- - Layer 10************* 997 LASTRA IN GESSOFIBRA, !- - Layer 11** Severe ** IP: IDF line~997 Error detected for Object=CONSTRUCTION** ~~~ ** Maximum arguments reached for this object, trying to process ->LASTRA IN GESSOFIBRA<-** Warning ** IP: Note -- Some missing fields have been filled with defaults. See the audit output file for details.** Severe ** IP: Possible incorrect IDD File** ~~~ ** IDD Version:"IDD_Version 8.3.0"** ~~~ ** Version in IDF="8.3" not the same as expected="8.3"** ~~~ ** Possible Invalid Numerics or other problems** Fatal ** IP: Errors occurred on processing IDF file. Preceding condition(s) cause termination....Summary of Errors that led to program termination:..... Reference severe error count=3..... Last severe error=IP: Possible incorrect IDD File************* Warning: Node connection errors not checked - most system input has not been read (see previous warning).************* Fatal error -- final processing. Program exited before simulations began. See previous error messages.************* EnergyPlus Warmup Error Summary. During Warmup: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.************* EnergyPlus Sizing Error Summary. During Sizing: 0 Warning; 0 Severe Errors.************* EnergyPlus Terminated--Fatal Error Detected. 1 Warning; 3 Severe Errors; Elapsed Time=00hr 00min 0.34sec
My question is how i can fix it ??? and why it tell me that:
** Severe ** IP: Possible incorrect IDD File** ~~~ ** IDD Version:"IDD_Version 8.3.0"** ~~~ ** Version in IDF="8.3" not the same as expected="8.3"** ~~~ ** Possible Invalid Numerics or other problems** Fatal ** IP: Errors occurred on processing IDF file. Preceding condition(s) cause termination....Summary of Errors that led to program termination:
Help me pleaseeeeeeee
Thanks and Happy new year!!!!!…
mpletes, i will be incremented. The default increment amount is 1.
If you change the syntax to be:
For i As Int32 = 0 To 9 Step 2
then i will be incremented by 2 each time. So now the loop will run 5 times:
first iteration i = 0
second iteration i = 2
third iteration i = 4
fourth iteration i = 6
fifth iteration i = 8
sixth iteration i = 10 which is more than 9 so the 6th iteration never happens.
If you use Step 0, i isn't incremented at all, and the loop should run forever, unless you have some other abort statement or if you adjust the iteration variables inside the loop. You are doing the latter. Your iteration variable is D. The loop itself does not increment it, but you manually increment it when you call D += T.
Although this is logically solid, it is very bad practice since it makes the code very hard to read.
Since D, R and N are not external variables, I would not expose them as Input parameters.
Also, you inner loop is very weird:
For R = R1 To R Step 0
Your iteration variable here is R, but your termination limit is also R. Not to mention the step is again zero.
Trying to debug this is very difficult because it's been written in a very unorthodox fashion. I have a distinct feeling this algorithm can be written down with far fewer variables and constructs.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
that are orienting the metal carpentries ("menuiserie métallique" sorry for my lack of english) with the hinges which are supporting the glass surfaces...
Things I don't understand for a structure like this:
1.How the elements are assembled on the building site ?
2.Do we have to consider that for each hexagonal glass we have only two curvy links that are facing one another ? (if more it connot be assembled !)
3.For the almost flat hexas we make hexa glasses, for the others we have to divide them in 6 triangles... ? triangles glass is very expensive but who cares hehe ...
I'm asking too much but it's just for my personal curiosity, I don't think i'll use this system because it will just make some nice 3ds for my portfolio but I want MODELS (prefer real things not virtual).
For the materiality, I was thinkings about wood surfaces assembled with a mid-wood system... It would be possible if I use a soft wood that accepts deformations...
I'll post the WIP when I'll simplify the main structure. Now the thing is composed of 7 triangles... I'll first start with 1 and complexify after hehe.
…
c etc.
2. IF you can find a BPA (Ball Pivot algo) you can by-pass the quite tricky reverse engineering coplanar clustering task. Good news: if memory serves well there's a BPA "add-on" component available for GH. Bad news: don't ask me where (I can't remember a thing or two).
PS: using Morph Methods you can severely "distort" the points List and get more intriguing topologies.
Internal BPA in action:
In order to get a "similar" with your picks result you'll need " A LOT of random points (say "around" 5/6K), probably some random Z noise ... and a rather very fast BPA.
If Z noise is used ... well ... then things are challenging: create a Truss like graph where tetrahedron type of rigidity is achieved: every quad set of neighbor points is connected with 6 lines.
best.…
returned to GSA, it is solving. You might have to reset result scales using the GSA button.
Cheers,
Jon
Checking Input Data - this may take some time.
________________________________________
Data checks commenced at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.
Checking input data for static analysis by GSS.
Shortest element (element 9) is 5 m long.Longest element (element 1) is 6 m long.
Data checks completed at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM. No errors or warnings found.
Analysis commenced at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.
Analysis by Gss Static analysis
Initialising results modulesSolving for displacementsSolution statisticsSparse Parallel Direct 12 active nodes 14 active elements 2 analysis cases 24 degrees of freedom Minimum degree ordering 90 terms in stiffness matrix Maximum stiffness is 4.804e+009 at node 4 in direction z Minimum stiffness is 3.132e+008 at node 2 in direction yy Condition number of the stiffness matrix is ~ 5328. Maximum relative error in displacements will be 2.4e-10 percent. Factorization in 109 msSolving for element forces and reactionsCalculation completeAnalysis completed with no errors
Analysis completed at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.Analysis time: 0.172 seconds
…
name: index (line :0)"I'm trying to evaluate list items against each other in the script. Here's the code. Private
Sub RunScript(ByVal listA As List(Of Double), ByVal listB As List(Of
Double), ByVal minDist As System.Object, ByVal bracketDistMin As
System.Object, ByVal bracketDistMax As System.Object, ByRef distFix As
Object) Dim masterList As New List(Of Double) Dim i As Integer For i = 0 To (listA.Count - 1) ' If Value is less than desired input, value is rounded up to minDist If (listA.Item(i) - listB.Item(i)) <= minDist Then masterList.Add(minDist) ' If list value is between a threshold above bracketDistMin and below bracketDistMax ' the value is rounded up or rounded down based on the mean between the two variables Else If (listA.Item(i) - listB.Item(i)) < bracketDistMax > bracketDistMin Then If (listA.item(i) - listB.Item(i)) < ((listA.Item(i) + listB.Item(i)) / 2) Then masterlist.Add(bracketDistMin) Else masterlist.Add(bracketDistMax) End If ' In all other cases, keep difference the same Else masterlist.Add(listA.Item(i) - listB.Item(i)) End If Next distFix = masterList End Sub If
there was a way to preform all these operations without VB, I would
love to know. I studied Java for about a year around 6 years ago, and I
don't have any experience in VB other than what I have been working on
today, so I would like some help!…
Added by arquiteuthis at 3:59am on September 6, 2010
) Course Fee: Professional EUR 825,- (+VAT), Student EUR 415,- (+VAT)
Led by plug-in developer and structural engineer Clemens Preisinger, along with Zeynep Aksoz and Matthew Tam from the expert Karamba3D team, this three-day workshop will focus on methods of setting up structural systems in the parametric environment of Grasshopper. The participants will be guided through the basics of analyzing and interpreting structural models, to optimization processes, and how to integrate Karamba3D into C# scripts.
This workshop is aimed towards beginner to intermediate users of Karamba3D. However, advanced users are also encouraged to apply. It is open to both professional and academic users. For beginner users of Rhino and Grasshopper, there will be an optional introductory course one day before the Karamba3D course.
Karamba3D 1is a parametric structural engineering tool which provides accurate analysis of spatial trusses, frames, and shells. Karamba3D is fully embedded in the parametric design environment of Grasshopper, a plug-in for the 3D modeling tool Rhinoceros. This makes it easy to combine parameterized geometric models, finite element calculations, and optimization algorithms like Galapagos.
Course Outline
Introduction and presentation of project examples
Optimization of cross sections of line-based and surface-based elements
Geometric optimization
Topological optimization
Structural performance informed form finding
Understanding analysis algorithms embedded in Karamba3D and visualizing results
Complex workflow processes in Rhino, Grasshopper, and Karamba3D
Places are limited to a maximum of 10 participants with limited educational places. A minimum of 4 participants is required for the workshop to take place. The workshop will be canceled if this quota is not filled by October 28. The workshop will be taught in English.
Course Requirements
Basic Rhino and Grasshopper knowledge is recommended. An introductory course is offered.
No knowledge of Karamba3D is needed. Participants should bring their own laptops with Grasshopper and either Rhino 5 or Rhino 6 installed. You can download a 90-day trial version of Rhino. Karamba3D ½ year licenses for non-commercial use will be provided to all participants.
Please register here……
Added by Matthew Tam at 6:38am on September 13, 2019
esos de diseño, el curso cubrirá los conceptos básicos para abordar proyectos de diseño a través del desarrollo de herramientas algorítmicas mediante un proceso de programación visual, se utilizará el software Rhinoceros 3d y el plugin Grasshopper como nuestras herramientas de trabajo.
Detalles:
Instructores: Luis de la Parra / Daniel Camiro
Lugar: Santiago centro
Ahumada Nº312 oficina 108 entrepiso, Santiago Centro (a una cuadra de metro plaza de armas).
Fechas: 27-30 de octubre 2011
Duracion: 25 horas
Cupo: Limitado a 15 plazas
Costos:
Estudiantes:$80,000
Profesionales:$100,000
Fecha limite de pago: lunes 24 de octubre 2011
Importante:Todos los niveles de experiencia son bienvenidos el único requisito es tener un entendimiento básico de los programas CAD y una actitud positiva hacia el aprendizaje de dichas herramientas.
Si planeas venir de fuera de la ciudad avísanos y te pondremos en contacto con otras personas que también vayan a hacerlo para en caso de desearlo puedan compartir su lugar de estancia.
Contacto Santiago:
Luis de la ParraCel: 714-660-33info@chidostudio.comhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Chido-Studio-Collective/233962149953480
No. Cuenta de Ahorro de Banco Estado : 00169946655
Para hacer transferencia bancaria favor de enviar mail solicitando los datos necesarios. Favor de mandarnos el deposito (scaneado) o el comprobante por mail para que recibas más información del curso y del tema a info@chidostudio.com
Todos los mails se responden en un máximo de 24 horas.
Muchas gracias por tu interés saludos
…
Added by daniel camiro at 10:48am on September 5, 2011
ngoing Co-de-iT research called “inFORMed matter“.
The “inFORMed matter” research project focuses on the exploration of additive fabrication processes, aiming to inform as in to produce form through the morphogenetic properties and capacities of matter by embedding further information structures during the fabrication process itself.
The goal is to go beyond the current state of prototyping, according to which the physical prototype should be as close as possible a clone of its digital counterpart, thus making fabrication a purely replicational phase. Instead, by coding and embedding additional levels of information aimed at mapping and defining material features and behaviors as well as different deployment patterns from which physical and aesthetic properties arise, the production and digital fabrication phase becomes an integral part of the design process.
The workshop it’s focused about the exploration and development of the whole process of design and digital manufacturing through additive processes of ceramic mixture materials.
[.] Workshop topics:
- Anticipate material behavior through digital simulation: test and apply different tool-based conditions and parameters (extrusion direction angle, speed of extrusion, variable layer thickness, etc … ) and evaluate the consequent material behavior in order to get useful feedback for the next iteration of the digital model. The aim is to understand how to embed material properties as code/information during the digital design phase, fine tuning it towards the desired effect-outcome. - Seamless design-to-machine pipeline: shorten the information pipeline from the design process to the constructor machine. This is achieved by acting on both factors: informing directly the machines by generating the necessary code in the design tool and build the design process around the capacities of the machines involved. - Embed morphogenetic material properties as design factors: understand and manage such properties, behaviors and their potential morphological outcomes for different materials, from clay to biologic matter, in order to map and use them as an atlas of expressive possibilities and performances of the material. - Understand constraints and opportunities determined by the chosen constructor agent/machine: learn to use and manage different machines to handle the extrusion tool for additive processes and learn to evaluate and exploit the influence, constraints and given opportunities provided by different machines and movement technologies.
During the workshop will be used as tools for handling the special ceramic extruder, a customized 3D printer, type delta, and a 6-axis Comau Robot NJ 60.
The final output will be then the result of influence, cooperation and conflict of these aspects upon, with and onto one another. Only successfully combining computational simulation, material properties and capacities and machine constraints and opportunities we can effectively evaluate and push further the design process potential and foster design and fabrication skills and sensibilities that will form the basis of a more comprehensive awareness in regard to the relations between computation and material aspects.
More info at: http://www.co-de-it.com/wordpress/informed-clay-matter-2-0-fablab-torino.html…
old" for energy simulation is not available so far (http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/ladybug/forum/topics/hb-daylight-setpoint-bug), I have to set up the energy simulation based on an annual daylight simulation. Hereby, I have some questions as follows.
- As for the lighting schedule (in csv format) generated from the "annual Profiles" in the "read Annual Results I" component in daylight simulation, how can I link it (instead of the default lighting schedule) to the succedent energy simulation? Could you please show this in my GH files?
I could imagine how to make "customized" EP constructions and EP loads and link them to the simulation. But, as for EP schedules, I can not figure out how the energy simulation can receive and recognize a "customized" EP schedule (i.e. from csv files). I am asking this because the light schedule generated by daylight simulation is in csv format, and also because the schedules provided by Honeybee are limited to some specific building type (i.e. office, retail etc.). But the schedules of some other type of buildings are not included, like the schedules of sports buildings.
- In the attached csv file (which is generated from the "annual Profiles" in the "read Annual Results I" component in daylight simulation), why the electric lighting is still partially "on" even when the "occupancy" shows "0 (absent)"?
For instance, "Row 16, 64...." in the csv file. As I understand, the electric lighting is partially/fully "on" only when the both of the following conditions are met, namely, there are people in the space and the illuminance level from daylight is below the threshold. Am I right?
- Is the above mentioned procedure a proper way to calculate the energy use for electric lighting when there is a lighting dimming system (the electric lighting may be continuously adjusted in proportion to the amount of daylight available)?
Apart from the above mentioned way of calculating the energy use for electric lighting, I also made other two ways for comparison showed in the attached image. But, the outcomes are very different. Which do you think is the most proper way to calculate the energy use for electric lighting when there is a lighting dimming system?
Thank you very much in advance!
Best,
Ding
…