ter file and notices that there is a lock on cluster 2, when hovering over it it says User A has it opened and maybe has a back log of recent saves. so user B goes to work on cluster 3, he clicks cluster 3 and it's contents explode outward revieling the definition of the roof. Now in User A's file cluster 3 has a lock on it. User B finishes and saves and closes an the definition folds back up into cluster 3 and now cluster 3 in user A's file has an update symbol. User A clicks it and now the roof is updated in user A's file.
…
Is it like this:
If a beam is connected from nod 0 to 1 and from 1 to 4. Another from 2 to 3 and from 3 to 5.
Node 1 and 3 have the same coordinates, but are they rigidly connected or not?
(0) --> {0}(0) overwrite etc
---
{2;2}(1) --> {2}(1)
{2;3}(0) --> {2}(0)
{2;3}(1) --> {2}(1)
Correct use of index in this case {A;B}(i) --> {A}
but because you don't need to use the index on the right hand side, don't specify it on the left, as it takes the [Path Mapper] longer to process when the index is used.…
Added by Danny Boyes at 2:00pm on September 25, 2011
3 of them have an area of 3 m^2
3 of them have an area of 6 m^2
3 of them have an area of 9 m^2
can I create a data tree with 3 branches sorted by area?
Thank you!…
it take just 3 weeks to finish the mockup after we assign them the drawings. pretty fast
there are 5 facade company took part in, including 3 aluminum mockup and 2 GRC company.
it take just 3 weeks to finish the mockup after we assign them the drawings. pretty fast
there are 5 facade company took part in, including 3 aluminum mockup and 2 GRC company.
o three parts:
branch 1:
{0;0} N = 3
{0;1} N = 3
branch 2:
{1;0} N = 5
{1;1} N = 5
branch 3:
{2;0} N = 30
{2;1} N = 30
parthmapper won't change the length of branch, explode tree won't give me two branches in one output
…