Search Results - 南京栖霞区（援交）援交上门微信156-8194-7106提供外围女小姐上门服务快速安排面到付款这里存放顺序变量，一行一个.9

Blog Post: PLUG > IT 2 | RHINO + GRASSHOPPER BASE | MILANO E ROMA | FEBBRAIO-MARZO 2016

Added by Arturo Tedeschi at 4:41pm on January 15, 2016

Event: AA ROME VISITING SCHOOL | SPRING 2013: e systems? Architecture can engage technologies to make buildings tectonically transforming and becoming aware of the active surroundings investigating data and responding to environmental change. The 10-day workshop investigates the design of computational kinetic structural systems, which interact with the behavior inherent in the city, environment and population. The aim of the workshop is to investigate parametric kinetic strategies that transform according to the ever-changing data system. Like architectural cybernetic machines embedded in a smart city, the projects interact with the population and the environment of Rome proposing another layer of urban strategy. These operations take place both by continually detecting the physical and non-physical data via sensors and by transforming their own forms. The complex dynamic interaction approach leads us to discard the imposition of a fixed form and, instead, create and use a computational kinetic artifice. Initially students attend lectures on current mainstream and academic research as well as tutorials on parametric modeling software, digital fabrication prototyping and robotic assembly. Then applying skills in a team-based structure, pursue computational design research coupling physical analogue experiments with computer-controlled kinetic prototype programming. The proposals are built assembling digitally fabricated parts and electronic devices, like Arduino boards, sensors and servos to interact with a data exchange and regulating form. For additional informations go to the AA WEBSITE: http://www.aaschool.ac.uk/STUDY/VISITING/rome _ …; Added by Arturo Tedeschi at 7:49am on February 27, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'C# sliders that contol sliders that ...': basis" problem ... all of a sudden - quite recently - a girl posted the MITESIGF (Most Important Thread Even Seen In Grasshopper Forums). She doesn't even realized that: she's novice: http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/array-1 4. Why this MITESIGF is MITESIGF? For 2 reasons: 4.a: Wooden pairs (Beams) Profile Curves (belonging in some tree) MUST allow individual control on a per "item basis" (OK, that's obvious) - see Images posted in the thread. No attractor (or any other "global" policy) can cut the mustard here (to tell you the truth this happens in 99% of pure engineering cases, but they appear very rarely in GH Forums - if at all, mind). If the profile curves are defined with 5 points (or 9 for the double thing) we need "on-the-fly" control over this Array (like the radii in your Sphere Manipulator) : 4.b: Critical Bottom-to-Top issues arise: Create a "global" topology (call it "parent") - the beams - and then place real-life "components" (call them "childs") that affect (most probably) the "parent". OK, that's impossible to do with GH/Rhino (peace of cake with CATIA/Microstation) but you can "approximate" things up to a point. Alternatively: you can "trigger" some interest from GH/Rhino developers if they have any AEC market(s) in mind. Topic 4.a requires the master-to-slave slider thingy (iterate over branches (index slider:master) > reset the 5 values (value slider:slave) > modify them on the fly > save > increase/decrease branch > ...). Other than that my definitions are far more challenging than this simple case ... but ... anyway ... long is the path (and hilly). more soon. best, The Troll …; Added by peter fotiadis at 12:45am on December 11, 2014

Comment on: Topic 'possible unbiased rendering engine integration in GH?': r your need.. bravo my friend! 2.Hahaha career first, woman later. 3.maybe it is because my country has yet to use the softwares you mentioned, I am pretty sure they are used by engineer, since my practice is only architectural work, we always collaborate with the engineer to get the job done (by collaborate, I mean passing on the job to the engineer, and then we just let them handle all the stuff, the sad news is architect and designers doesnt get paid much to deal with those) in contrast with your software, me and my team use Rhino,GH,3dsmax, and Zbrush-- these are standard package you got after u graduate from any arch.college. the level of detail I produce in my modelling is not as "heavy" as yours because the client I face every week only worries about the appearance of the building, as well as convenience in terms of planning, efficiency, and cost control over the design. I am surprised you don't use REVIT or ArchiCAD? they are the standard for BIM documentation. 4.well, subdiv modeling is one of my fave. (That is why Tspline is my fave tool in rhino, to sketch out the model that I want, however it depends on the type of geometry you are after, for "solid modelling" I prefer Subdiv modelling rather than standard NURBS ) 5. no comment for that hahaha 6.I disagree, I think Rhino needs a TOP rendering software as part of rhino system itself. to make it at least on par with 3dsmax. rhino isn't built for restrictive use like CATIA, so its purpose is for "MODELLING and VISUALIZATION". at the moment we only see the "MODELLING" part. 7.+1 for this 8.I have to agree with that. there is no way we can incorporate BIM in Rhino. also it is not widely accepted to somehow have BIM file in Rhino format. but... 9. in the future it might be, because if you compared rhino 4 to rhino 5 there has been a major breakthrough, who knows what will happen in rhino 6 or 7. 10.I saw a post the other day,David said he intended GH to be algorimtic modelling instead of parametric, and GH is like a swiss army knife, it has thousands of tools to do general job, but it requires 3rd party member (we call it add-on) to extend its uses. Id prefer GH to have much broader function to encourage people to expand its wings PS= are u talking about augmented reality? :) Peace!…; Added by Runnie at 5:12am on January 24, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'is it freeform or just algorithem': strictly with code (BTW: did you crossed Rubicon?). 1. See this: Imagine a curve (say a "rail") that is divided N times and then circles are created with random radii. Circle control points (9, that is) are sampled (obviously) into a DataTree where branches are the rail divisions. Let's call the control points: "start" seed points. 2. Imagine a capability ... that stores all these (the original "seed" control points) into a "parameter" and then each time that a change occurs to them (varying the x/y, on a per point on a per branch on a per plane basis[that provides the Z]) stores the "modified point" into the parameter (at the same index with the old: meaning "deleting" the old) ... and then some other code gets that data and makes curves and lofts them. Reset means: sample again the original "seed" points into that "parameter". Closing are reopening the definition has no effect: the lofted stuff is derived from the (internalized, so to speak) modified points (from the "parameter"). 3. A variety of "automation" is available: for instance if you jump from branch to branch and from item to item the value of the selected point is inquired and the sliders that control the new x/y are "set" to 0,0 (meaning no change - yet) values. There's mo "store" mode: it works automatically as far as you modify points or you hit the reset button 4. This does that (only achievable with code): 5. Obviously points can been replaced with anything ... and thus ... we can individually modify items in collections ... and forget for ever attractor points and all that (OK where appropriate, he he). I'll post 30 similar examples soon in the forthcoming mother of all threads: "GH goes (at last) interactive". Watch this space. BTW: study the "animation" where points with index 6 are "sequentially" modified. I've added some delay in order to give you time to get the gist of the whole thingy. best, Lord of Darkness …; Added by peter fotiadis at 3:38am on July 24, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'Parametricism. Is it still in force?': pattern . In the self conscious culture new purposes (BTW: mostly fabricated if you ask me) are occurring all the time ;the people who make forms are constantly required to deal with problems that are either entirely new or at best modifications of old problems (BTW: that's what we call garbage in garbage out). Under these circumstances it is not enough to copy old physical patterns. So that people will be able to make innovations and modifications as required, ideas about how and why things get their shape must be introduced. Teaching must be based on explicit general principles of function, rather than unmentioned and specifi c principles of shape. I shall call a culture unselfconscious if its form-making is learned informally, through imitation and correction . And I shall call a culture selfconscious if its form-making is taught academically, according to explicit rules. Now why are forms made in the selfconscious culture not so well fitting or so clearly made as those in the unselfconscious culture ? (answers: to The Lord, District 9, North Pole). In one case the form-making process is a good one,in the other bad. What is it that makes a form-making process good or bad? In explaining why the unselfconscious process is a good one, hardly anyone bothers, nowadays, to argue the myth of the primitive genius, the unsophisticated craftsman supposedly more gifted than his sophisticated counterpart. The myth of architectural Darwinism has taken its place.Yet though this new myth is more acceptable , in its usual form it is not really any more informative than the other.It says, roughly, that primitive forms are good as a result of a process of gradual adaptation - that over many centuries such forms have gradually been fitted to their cultures by an intermittent though persistent series of corrections. But this explanation is vague hand-waving. It doesn't tell us what it is that prevents such adaptation from taking place successfully in the selfconscious culture, which is what we want to know most urgently (Note: Prophet was ultra optimistic on that one, but nobody's perfect). And even as an explanation of good fit in the unselfconscious culture, the raw concept of adaptation is something less than satisfactory. If forms in an unselfconscious culture fit now, the chances are that they always did . We know of no outstanding differences between the present states and past states of unselfconscious cultures; and this assumption, that the fit of forms in such cultures is the result of gradual adjustment (that is, improvement) overtime , does not illuminate what must actually be a dynamic process in which both form and context change continuously, and yet stay mutually well adjusted all the time .…; Added by peter fotiadis at 3:08am on June 10, 2016

Comment on: Topic '[clarified and WIP] butterfly doesn't work with OpeFOAM v1606': k(Foam::Ostream&) in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #1 Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #2 ? in "/lib64/libc.so.6" #3 double Foam::sumProd<double>(Foam::UList<double> const&, Foam::UList<double> const&) in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #4 Foam::PCG::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #5 Foam::GAMGSolver::solveCoarsestLevel(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&) const in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #6 Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMatrix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #7 Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so" #8 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dictionary const&) in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/lib/libfiniteVolume.so" #9 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/simpleFoam" #10 Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve() in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/simpleFoam" #11 ? in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/simpleFoam" #12 __libc_start_main in "/lib64/libc.so.6" #13 ? in "/opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v1606+/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/simpleFoam" The folders generated in the process are: Hope you can kindly advise. Thanks! -Ji…; Added by Grasshope to Ladybug Tools at 12:20pm on August 9, 2016

Comment on: Topic 'Create multiple batch files so I can run them parallel on a 128-processor server': TB of RAM. I think I'm going to start a GoFundMe campaign to buy one for myself :) 2- The server's cost is about $13 an hour. I get free access to supercomputer through my university and xsede.org because I earned an NSF Honorable mention last March, however, the supercomputers available through both resources are a little complicated for me to use, as opposed to the one available from amazon that has Microsoft server 2012 already installed. 3- I wanted to run 400 annual glare simulations for 400 different views. 4- I tried a to perform annual glare simulation for one view on my Dell XPS that has Intel Core i7-6700HQ processor and 16GB of system memory. The simulation took 2 hours to complete. Radiance parameter ab was set to 6. 5- I wanted to obtain the batch file for each view so I can run them on the server. So I used the fly component to run all 400 simulations and closed the cmd windows, that wasn't bad ( for me at least) because I asked my son to this job for me, he was just glad to help me :) 6- I created one batch file using this cmd command: dir /s /b *.bat > runall.bat This created a file with the path to each .bat file. I edited this file in Notepad++ to include the word "start" at the beginning of each line. This was done using the "find and replace" dialogue box. 7- I split my newly created batch file into 3 batch files, each one has about 130 file names and " start" before the file names. 8- installed radiance on my server 9- Ran the first batch file on the server, this started 130 cmd windows performing my simulations, CPU usage was anywhere between 90% to 100% and about 105 GB of RAMs were used. 10. It took about 5 hours to complete all 130 simulations, I expected to run all in 2 hours but can't complain because this would've taken about 260 hours to run on my laptop. After the simulations done I ran the second and then the third batch files ( total of about 15 hours). 11. I got 400 valid dgb files. Couldn't be happier! …; Added by Ninja to Ladybug Tools at 8:54pm on August 10, 2016

Comment on: Topic 'Problems with MapWinGis installation': you post a screenshot of what the message coming from its readMe! output looks like?2) Close your Grasshopper and Rhino.3) Download "Revo Uninstaller Pro" from here. It is free for first 30 days, which is what we need.4) Right click on the RevoUninProSetup.exe and check if the file is blocked. If it is, unblock it.5) Run the RevoUninProSetup.exe file and install "Revo Uninstaller Pro".6) Uninstall "MapWinGIS" with "Revo Uninstaller Pro". It is important that "Revo Uninstaller Pro" deletes not only files from MapWinGIS installation folder, but also all other leftovers (as registry inputs). Here is a small tutorial on how to do that. Watch it from 6:10 till the end.7) Restart your PC8) When your Windows boots up, make sure that you are logged in as Administrator!9) In your Start menu's search box type: "UAC", which will find your User Account Control Settings. Click on it, and a new window will open. Set the bar on the left to "Never notify".10) Turn off your Windows Firewall.11) Then turn off your custom Firewall (in case you have another one, besides standard Windows Firewall).12) Completely turn off your Antivirus.13) Download again the MapWinGIS-only-v4.9.4.2-x64.exe.exe file from here.14) Right click on the MapWinGIS-only-v4.9.4.2-x64.exe file and see if it is blocked. If it is, unblock it.15) Right click on MapWinGIS-only-v4.9.4.2-x64.exe file and choose: "Run as"... Administrator.16) One the installation preparation steps start, choose "Full installation". Wait for the MapWinGIS installation to finish.17) Right-click on "Rhino 5" icon and then choose: "Run as administrator".18) Open the the ironpython_admin.gh file again, and again post a screenshot of the message coming from its readMe! output.19) Drop the "Gismo Gismo" component to Grasshopper canvas. Post a screenshot of the message coming out from its readMe! output. So we will need in total three screenshots of the readMe! output messages. Thank you once again for being patient, and sorry for the large number of steps.…; Added by djordje to Gismo at 1:52am on April 9, 2017

Topic: Concrete bridge fence, general advice: ncrete. I spend the whole day working on a rhino model of one fence, and it's still not finished (there are 9 different ones), but chances are that some of the measurements will have to change later on. Then I won't be happy. In the end, we need one closed polysurface, in order for the printer to work. It's a huge amount of work to connect all the seperate pieces, delete overlapping surfaces, join, fillet etc etc. So, I was hoping for Grasshopper! I've attached the Rhinofile of the example. This one still isn't one surface, some fillets are not connecting *sigh* I would be so happy if I was able to even generate a small part in Grasshopper. I started with the middle frames. They are tapered to the top (2mm) and need a fillet (5mm). I'm afraid I need to do some sort of Boolean-Difference, since the lines I have, are the outlines of the cells, and not the complete branch. (I don't think this is possible?) As I mentioned, I'm new to Grasshopper, and I'm afraid I'm in over my head with this one. This is what I thought I should do: INNER BRANCH STRUCTURE - Select botton curves - Move up 60 mm - Offset 2mm to outside <here I got stuck, loft doesn't work, how to connect these pieces, so you get tapered volumes from the cells?> - make volume (one way or the other) - create large volume to extract cells from - Boolean large volume and cells <you now should have the tapered branch structure> - select top edges - fillet edge 5mm <this didn't work in one go in Rhino, since there were problems with some of the surfaces....not sure how to fix this in Grasshopper> OUTER FRAME - Sweep2 all the section profiles along curves - Intersect/boolean/join? And then I need to join both the inner and the outer structure... sigh.... It would be great If you guys could give me some tips to get me started! I'm lost! Thank you so much! Anja …; Added by Anja at 11:19am on December 8, 2010

Search Results - 南京栖霞区（援交）援交上门微信156-8194-7106提供外围女小姐上门服务快速安排面到付款这里存放顺序变量，一行一个.9

About

Translate

Search

Photos

3b3c30b82651e1836dd71339b2046529

Inflated Diamonds

Diamond Attractor

Inflated Shell

Kangaroo Structure

Videos

Random Abstract 2d Pattern - Rhino Grasshopper

Inflated Diamonds

Diamond Attractor

Inflated Shell

Kangaroo Structure

Parametric Bench