adaptable planning system through a set of rules and constraints.
The project's blog can be viewed here,
http://www.thewaltzofwar.blogspot.com/
Basically, we need development to grow along the many trainlines found within the site, starting from the border crossings and growing larger at the trainline intersection points before splitting off onto the other trainlines.
'Development' is a pretty loose term and could be a variety of different things (commercial, residential, parks, etc) although at the moment we would be rather content with deploying primitive geometry in a random fashion along the trainlines - with the intention of becoming more specific later with an array of custom development profiles/forms.
We essentially need to be able to output many different iterations/scenarios (derived by inserting these forms at different locations and in different orders/sequences) of the masterplan to explore how the different development types interact with each other.
We need to do this...in Grasshopper. (Time lapse of physical model)
We would really appreciate some advice on even how to begin doing this. Any suggestions or tips will be contributing to what will eventually be a modular, ever-shifting urban space that challenges contemporary infrastructure.
Thanks!…
t item (see the image), is it possible to do this in another way (quickly) ?
Is it possible to divide that curve into 2 separate curves using a point that i've used for the division?
Thanks…
Added by luca.pavarin at 4:08pm on January 7, 2010
should not be open).
3. All releases of Rhino 5, Arduino, GH, and FF are the latest as of May 21st.
I Boolean toggled the port open, but I can't seem to get any output to display from the UnoRead component. I was hoping to see values from any of the analog inputs (APin5 depicted) connected as info gets sent back and forth between the Arduino and my comp. I'm getting simultaneous "Hooray" and "Whoops" messages, and I can't pinpoint why. See attached JPG.
Does it have to do with the fact that I have a list of COM ports? Even though I know COM 3 is the correct one as defined in the IDE, do I need to re-declare it in Grasshopper as well? Does the {0} shown impact this output?
Any direction is appreciated.
Thanks - JFig
…
the curves on surface issue it's solved seting flatten to the surface control point output. Still didnt know how to group points like:
1;1, 2;2, 3;3.....
1;2, 2;3, 3;4....
1;3, 2;4, 3;5...
....
is also worth mentioning that, if you haven't used them yet, we have a few components that can help you manage and format your geometry in the way that E+ likes (including components to split building masses into core/perimeter zones and a component to ensure that there are reciprocal matching surfaces of adjacent zones). These 3 videos in the Honeybee Energy Modeling tutorial series should help you use them in your workflow:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDvBWDA0aF0&list=PLruLh1AdY-SgW4uDtNSMLeiUmA8YXEHT_&index=10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DClON71RuuA&list=PLruLh1AdY-SgW4uDtNSMLeiUmA8YXEHT_&index=11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMQ2Pau4q6c&list=PLruLh1AdY-SgW4uDtNSMLeiUmA8YXEHT_&index=12
-Chris…