to 31st.Taught by Radul Shishkov - of DesignMorphine, and Rasha M. AlShami - of 90 Degrees Studio.
Apply Now at www.designmorphine.com/workshop/future/vertical-variables-v1/
or
www.90degrees-studio.com
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/designmorphine
and Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/designmorphine/…
End of method assumed. (line 90)Error: Comma or ')' expected. (line 90)Warning: Function 'GetFrustumNearPlane' doesn't return a value on all code paths. Are you missing a 'Return' statement? (line 91)…
Added by Adam Chałupski at 11:24pm on September 23, 2012
blinds be (B1,B2..B5). Then the geometry for the five iterations will be ((A+B1), (A+B2)...(A+B5)).
And assume that you are measuring illuminance at four points inside the room (x1,x2,x3,x4) and one point outside the room(y1).
The way Daysim works ( and should work as per the best of my understanding) is that for each setting of the blind (ie. B1,B2,..B5), a separate value of (x1,x2,x3,x4) gets calculated through the Daylight Coefficient Method. So let's say you have illuminance thresholds of (p,q,r,s,t) corresponding to (B1,B2,..B5). What the shade-control algorithm does is that it compares the illuminance at y1 with your threshold of (p,q,..t) and then chooses a value of (x1,x,2,x3,x4) on basis of that. So, when we repeat this process for (365x24=)8760 hours , we end up with a value of a shade setting for each hour which was set on basis of your threshold illuminance values.
I would have gladly answered your question on HB itself, however, I usually work with Daysim directly through commandline.
(BTW, if you are interested in reading more about Daysim google Christoph Reinhart's dissertation on the subject, along with some papers by Zack Rogers).…
many applications, such as language modeling, text classification, and machine translation. Additionally, aggregation grammars can be combined with other techniques such as spell checkers to improve the accuracy of language processing systems. The 맞춤법 검사기 can detect and correct misspellings in a sentence, enabling the aggregation grammar to parse it more accurately and efficiently.…
"raise to the power of 0.5" which is the same as computing the square-root of the ratio.
Note that the Expression component I'm using isn't available yet in the public build, you'll need to use the F(x) component that has 2 inputs, or of course replace the expression with pure Grasshopper components (Division and SquareRoot in that order).
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
rees west to 1 degree west). Changing the latitudinal domain from, say, 0:1 (the equator to 1 degree north) to 88:89 (88 degrees north to 89 degrees north), has zero effect on the x,y shape of the topography map generated. However, in reality, the map should be far, far thinner in the latter case, because longitudinal lines get closer together toward the north and south poles. In actuality, the shape should be close to a trapezoid in both cases, but this is probably not a necessary detail for most people producing maps, since, at an urban or smaller scale, the latitudinal lines bounding the north and south of the map will probably not be that significantly different in length. But the maps should at least stretch from close-to-square for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the equator to an extremely thin rectangle for a 1 degree x 1 degree map near the north pole.
As an example, I'm looking at a location in Sheffield, UK. The relevant SRTM HGT file spans from 53 N to 54 N, and 2 W to 1 W. The length of the map in the north-south direction should be approximately 111 km, as is the case with the topo map generated by Elk (and a near-standard for 1 degree latitude anywhere in the world). The length of the map in the east-west direction, however, should be somewhere in the range of 67 km, since the 2 W and 1 W longitudinal lines are much closer together at this latitude than they are at the equator. Thus the map should be nearly twice as long in the North-South direction as it is wide in the East-West direction.
If this were to be sorted out, I think it would be really nice to then have the SRTM topo map be positioned automatically in relation to the OSM map being brought in. I think it's good that the OSM map is positioned at 0,0, rather than it's world coordinates, but maybe the SRTM topo map could be aligned with it based on the latitude and longitude domains we input to the SRTM grasshopper module.…